General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Assange and Chomsky Appear Arm-In-Arm at Ecuadorian Embassy [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)that were long ago debunked, which is WHY we will never see the CHARGES I asked you to post. Because the Prosecutor has no case. The radical lawyer that had this reopened after it was rightfully dismissed due to not a shred of evidence against Assange, as we know the main 'accuser' has been found to have fabricated 'evidence' and not very well, even THAT radical lawyer has stated that 'this case, if it ever went to court, would be total loss'.
Yet both of them continue to participate in what they KNOW is a corrupt, libelous attack by powerful people on a News Editor simply for the purpose of silencing him.
I am not going to re post all that we know about those false allegations, but it's astounding that a prosecutor would make such a fool of herself for this long a period of time by demonstrating to the world, that she is participating in a witch hunt. But who knows why she continues to do so?
When the 'condom' claimed to have been ripped by Assange was discovered to have zero DNA on it,, this case was over. When a woman is so stupid as to try to pass off a piece of evidence as PROOF of her claims, which she knew would do no such thing, she is a liar, and not a very smart one at that.
So there is no case, there never was, and there never will be charges filed. Most intelligent people KNEW this and said so, years ago. And it appears we were correct.
Why would you support an obvious attempt to silence the press? That is what I don't understand.