General Discussion

FBaggins

(26,721 posts)

94. This dispatcher listed there didn't have any trouble interpreting it

Wed Nov 26, 2014, 03:30 PM

Nov 2014

And she was pretty clear that Wilson was asking if they needed help with the robbery follow-up and they were updatig him

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

127 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Transcripts show #DarrenWilson lied to the grand jury [View all] kpete Nov 2014 OP

good question for the folks who keep noiretextatique Nov 2014 #1

A good answer would be that hearsay doesn't trump actual evidence FBaggins Nov 2014 #4

not according to this post noiretextatique Nov 2014 #6

Yes, that's what the post says. The post is wrong. FBaggins Nov 2014 #10

OK...I will check that out. eom noiretextatique Nov 2014 #17

With all due respect, you are mis-stating the contents of the transcript. Wilson does not KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #31

See my #29 FBaggins Nov 2014 #34

All valid questions but all based solely on your inferences and not on anything specifically KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #40

The problem there is that it isn't "not x" FBaggins Nov 2014 #46

To re-post the 'keeper' from the OP: KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #50

Of course it is, some posters think this is a game that they have to win. Rex Nov 2014 #54

So you think he called for backup on a jaywalking stop? FBaggins Nov 2014 #56

Hunh? 367 seems almost non-sensical. (Can't seem to copy and paste, so KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #64

This dispatcher listed there didn't have any trouble interpreting it FBaggins Nov 2014 #94

I believe the Chief of Police, sorry if you don't want to look at the facts. Rex Nov 2014 #65

You mean that you believe this statement by the chief FBaggins Nov 2014 #75

Link to Dispatch Transcripts, please. n/t 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #42

See #15 below FBaggins Nov 2014 #47

And, or rather, But ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #53

Actually... that's incorrect. FBaggins Nov 2014 #61

No ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #85

Your first two statements contradict each other. FBaggins Nov 2014 #90

A direct conversation is not "hearsay." WinkyDink Nov 2014 #63

That's nice. This isn't a direct conversation. FBaggins Nov 2014 #70

Guess again: WinkyDink Nov 2014 #74

I'm sorry... you'll have to look up the definition of hearsay. FBaggins Nov 2014 #78

That's their foundation lie...him knowing about the store incident. FarPoint Nov 2014 #7

But if he did know, why did he stop them for jaywalking? starroute Nov 2014 #35

Bigger question deist99 Nov 2014 #91

"Admits"?? I think that word does not mean what you think it means starroute Nov 2014 #101

Whatever you think "admit" means TexasMommaWithAHat Nov 2014 #102

What do you mean "bad pot"? Alittleliberal Nov 2014 #111

They were close to home and were crossing over the streets, not R B Garr Nov 2014 #115

So in other words, the grand jury knew he lied & didn't care. crazylikafox Nov 2014 #2

the fix was in Lex Nov 2014 #3

The Grand Jury should have never heard from him in the first place... Thor_MN Nov 2014 #18

Potential defendants are usually legally entitled to give testimony before a grand jury branford Nov 2014 #27

What's worse is there is not a thing we can do but suck it up. FarPoint Nov 2014 #5

If you listen to the dispatch radio audio Lee-Lee Nov 2014 #8

You are correct Ma'am Elmergantry Nov 2014 #9

Neither has to be lying FBaggins Nov 2014 #11

Thats true technically Elmergantry Nov 2014 #12

What page are the audio transcripts on? rgbecker Nov 2014 #13

Here's a link for just the radio traffic transcript FBaggins Nov 2014 #15

No indication Wilson (21) heard call about theft. rgbecker Nov 2014 #21

You need to read a little farther FBaggins Nov 2014 #29

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2014 #45

Seems 22 and 25 when they last talked to Wilson were looking for a guy in Sharondale apartments. rgbecker Nov 2014 #48

Correct, Wilson has no idea who the two teens are. Some people must pretend otherwise Rex Nov 2014 #55

Hardly. The "weak narrative" here is clear FBaggins Nov 2014 #58

And a few here believe a cop deserves to get away with murder as by the desperate attempts Rex Nov 2014 #62

Don't count me with such FBaggins Nov 2014 #81

According to the audio, Wilson didn't get on the radio until noon... BklnDem75 Nov 2014 #19

Brown's family's lawyers say stop had nothing to do with convenience store theft. rgbecker Nov 2014 #24

Oh I know... BklnDem75 Nov 2014 #32

So did the Chief of Police. Repeatedly. At a press conference. nt IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #123

Unremorseful lying murdering sack of shit. lonestarnot Nov 2014 #14

Killings turbinetree Nov 2014 #16

Who is the Defense? The Cop was in this Prosecutor's mind. KeepItReal Nov 2014 #22

Defense turbinetree Nov 2014 #38

That's the way a Grand Jury works. GGJohn Nov 2014 #43

Yes, however gcomeau Nov 2014 #105

I have to agree with you on every point you make here. GGJohn Nov 2014 #107

Why the fuck is he "herding" them with his car? Cosmocat Nov 2014 #20

It doesn't seem to matter what their training is, too many cops seem to do whatever they Dark n Stormy Knight Nov 2014 #103

What was said over the radio by other than Wilson does not prove shit. It proves the information was GoneFishin Nov 2014 #23

What you say to the police can and normally is used against you Johonny Nov 2014 #25

That's irrelevant gibberish. But thanks for playing. GoneFishin Nov 2014 #124

Not to mention colaborating with other officers on the way to and from Hospital... rgbecker Nov 2014 #26

Also, having a say in how long to leave the body in place until they decided if GoneFishin Nov 2014 #125

Has anyone located in the jury's transcript a testimony of the distance from Wilson to Brown? rgbecker Nov 2014 #28

Yes I did a few minutes ago. Elmergantry Nov 2014 #39

Thanks for the link on Wilson's 8'-10' testimony. rgbecker Nov 2014 #49

Thanks for posting, kpete. Reading this thread, I cannot BELIEVE truth2power Nov 2014 #30

Thanks for posting. Food for serious thought. - nt KingCharlemagne Nov 2014 #37

Only in America does a black boy go on trial for his own murder. Central Scruitinizer Nov 2014 #51

"I never saw the prosecutor ask why he did not just drive away." Rex Nov 2014 #60

I agree with everything you've said... truth2power Nov 2014 #82

Sure deist99 Nov 2014 #98

Oh Good.. We need some more Law and Order Guys around here. busterbrown Nov 2014 #104

Mindset deist99 Nov 2014 #113

Boy you sure put a hell of a lot of that Cigar box Robbery don’t ya.. busterbrown Nov 2014 #116

no silly... Locrian Nov 2014 #120

Please tell me what part of my post you take issue with.. truth2power Nov 2014 #109

I used to steal 4-Lokos from gas stations Alittleliberal Nov 2014 #126

Really? deist99 Nov 2014 #112

Eighty pounds? Fumesucker Nov 2014 #118

If you have had training Central Scruitinizer Dec 2014 #127

Will there be a civil suit? libodem Nov 2014 #33

These proceedings have no bearing on any future civil suit. But why ask, when only the family knows? WinkyDink Nov 2014 #67

Why ask? libodem Nov 2014 #92

No, you're not stupid. Moosepoop Nov 2014 #108

"Robbery Had Nothing to Do with Lethal Shooting, Ferguson Police Chief Says" (Aug 15, 2014) IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #36

Yeah some here refuse to believe the Chief of Police Rex Nov 2014 #57

Wilson needs to go to prison. vkkv Nov 2014 #84

This should torque you off even more: IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #87

Transcipt deist99 Nov 2014 #99

The store owner says he did not call. Which shall I believe? IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #100

that doesn't even make sense backwoodsbob Nov 2014 #121

One of the many mysterious inconsistencies. IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #122

So which is it? dpibel Nov 2014 #114

Cherry picking deist99 Nov 2014 #119

Come on! Give Officer wilson a break ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #41

LOL ... Really? ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #44

Is that a big word, "destination"? What synonym would you have expected? WinkyDink Nov 2014 #69

"We're just going over there" ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2014 #88

In Vol.5 Page 202. of the transcript Wilson says as he is quoted above about 'store theft' vkkv Nov 2014 #52

Can you check your second reference? FBaggins Nov 2014 #66

Sorry, make that Vol 21 - Page 71 and 72. Dispatch says Wilson responded to theft. vkkv Nov 2014 #79

See post #36. Either the Chief of Police lied to the public (and never retracted) IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #80

That's incorrect FBaggins Nov 2014 #93

Link, please. I've got three quoting him, made over the course of days. IdaBriggs Nov 2014 #97

Okay, Vol 5. Pages 52-53 witness establablishes that Wilson did NOT KNOW about the robbery. vkkv Nov 2014 #86

FIVE MUST READ PAGES from transcript: (eg; Someone is lying) vkkv Nov 2014 #89

Yeah the Chief of Police fucked it all up for Wilson by declaring he knew nothing Rex Nov 2014 #59

"the Chief of Police fucked it all up for Wilson": Not really, as the IGNORANT GJ just showed us. WinkyDink Nov 2014 #68

Painful, but good point. Rex Nov 2014 #71

And the thing is, this contradiction, a MAJOR one, ought to have forced a trial. Instead, the GJ WinkyDink Nov 2014 #72

The DA never planned on the GJ coming back with an inditement. Rex Nov 2014 #73

God, remember how the DoJ used to act? Little Rock and Ike; U Of Alabama and JFK and the great WinkyDink Nov 2014 #76

And the Ferguson Police Chief confirms that Wilson did not know about the alleged robbery: sabrina 1 Nov 2014 #77

Will he be at least indicted for perjury? ncjustice80 Nov 2014 #83

K&R Happy Thanksgiving kpete n/t bobthedrummer Nov 2014 #95

FIVE MUST READ PAGES from transcript (Someone is lying and they are most likely the accused) vkkv Nov 2014 #96

Yes he did. Of course I EXPECTED that. nt BootinUp Nov 2014 #106

He said what he was TOLD to say,.....and still is. Spitfire of ATJ Nov 2014 #110

, blkmusclmachine Nov 2014 #117