Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
14. oh and it's well known you too make some pretty idiotic broad claims, sister.
Wed Apr 18, 2012, 02:51 PM
Apr 2012

that over abundance of self righteousness of yours is also disheartening. If you are so into spell checking others perhaps you should look deep into yourself and work on capitalizing the first letter in a sentence.



oh please. RT is what it is. And that certainly is not a legitimate journalism outlet cali Apr 2012 #1
The NY Times piece is ludicrous. Hissyspit Apr 2012 #4
oh for pity's sake. The NYT is a mixed bag for sure cali Apr 2012 #10
There is plenty to criticize about Reporters Without Borders, too. Hissyspit Apr 2012 #15
Well that was ... GeorgeGist Apr 2012 #39
No it wasn't. Hissyspit Apr 2012 #42
neither is CNN Whisp Apr 2012 #9
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #12
oh and it's well known you too make some pretty idiotic broad claims, sister. Whisp Apr 2012 #14
You haven't watched much of RT's programming, have you. Our MSM should be half as good and we sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #38
Indeed, it says volumes... sure... GE has no influence on their media companies fascisthunter Apr 2012 #2
Of course GE has influence but that's really not the same as cali Apr 2012 #5
List of journalists killed in Russia Swede Apr 2012 #3
I don't think Assange believes his greatest threat is from Russia. Hissyspit Apr 2012 #7
I don't think that was the point of the post RZM Apr 2012 #20
I Understand that. Hissyspit Apr 2012 #24
RT is occasionally interesting, but one should never forget hifiguy Apr 2012 #6
"Probably more honest than Faux?" Hissyspit Apr 2012 #8
and the west has a corporate propaganda network. Whisp Apr 2012 #11
they are both propaganda tools. Anyone who can't recognize that cali Apr 2012 #13
Greenwald acknowledged Hissyspit Apr 2012 #17
Actually, it is not pro-Putin at all. sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #40
I saw the show PADemD Apr 2012 #16
"funded by the Russian government" chrisa Apr 2012 #18
Assange is taking a paycheck from Putin, and Greenwald is pissy about a snarky article msanthrope Apr 2012 #19
Heeheeheehee! Greenwald via Twitter: Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #21
LOL!!!!! fascisthunter Apr 2012 #22
They choose their guests carefully RZM Apr 2012 #25
Precisely. joshcryer Apr 2012 #27
A lot of outlets do that RZM Apr 2012 #29
Yes, I am sure you were critical of Greenwald Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #30
No I wasn't, because I never even heard of him until a year or two ago RZM Apr 2012 #31
He's been a critic of the mainstream media for nearly a decade. Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #32
I've got no beef with the Kremlin getting their message out in English RZM Apr 2012 #33
I don't think that Greenwald, Assange, or anyone on DU would disagree that RT Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #34
I don't know about that RZM Apr 2012 #36
I think you are confusing the entirety of the network with appeal of some shows. Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #37
Heh heh. mmonk Apr 2012 #26
Lol! sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #41
My post from yesterday contains a link and excerpt from The Dissenter at FDL... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #23
K&R for Assange whanking the noses of the world's elite, again. riderinthestorm Apr 2012 #28
I am looking forward to next weeks show! Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Glenn Greenwald: Attacks ...»Reply #14