Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ACCER70

(1 post)
55. Get it right
Tue Apr 17, 2012, 07:40 PM
Apr 2012

If what you are saying is true then there would have been no 1st class deaths.

It might interest you to know that the richest man in America, J.J. Astor, died on the Titanic after seeing his pregnant 18 year-old wife to a lifeboat. He gave up his seat to two 3rd class children, according to their account of the night.

A few other rather famous luminaries of the time were also on board and did not survive though their wealth made survival a certainty had they chosen to take the seats instead of declining them for lower class women and children. These include but are not limited to:
B. Guggenheim
I. Strauss
G. Wick
G. Widener
J. Thayer
A. Butt
E. Kent

The largest single group of civilian victims on the Titanic were 2nd class men with a loss of 92%. Conversely, the 3rd class men lost was 84%. For 1st class it was 67%.

The largest single number of Titanic deaths was among the male crew members: 693.

You can't blame the number of 3rd class deaths on the rich. The Titanic, was much like the government. They didn't have enough lifeboats for everyone so when disaster struck they launched the boats they had at less than full capacity. They are the ones at fault for the number of causalities.

You had a better chance of dying on the Titanic is you were, effectively, "middle class" than if you were either rich or poor. You are right, times haven't changed.


Bump For Ann's Early B-Day otohara Apr 2012 #1
LOL emulatorloo Apr 2012 #12
how is it sort of unraveling? IcyPeas Apr 2012 #16
Previous Statements By Her Husband otohara Apr 2012 #19
oh, yes, I have seen that IcyPeas Apr 2012 #25
Oh Wait Till Rev. Al, Ed Schultz otohara Apr 2012 #27
I've seen it several times now PatSeg Apr 2012 #29
work makes right! except for the lazy rich. ChairmanAgnostic Apr 2012 #2
+10 whathehell Apr 2012 #9
+1000 nt abelenkpe Apr 2012 #31
Sounds like the Romney boys. RandySF Apr 2012 #3
Hey now! gratuitous Apr 2012 #18
What do those boys do all day? aquart Apr 2012 #59
Almost sounds like he is describing the Paris Hilton syndrome tk2kewl Apr 2012 #4
Great catch. K & R for more exposure. riderinthestorm Apr 2012 #5
Bush Junior and his Twins fightforfreedom123 Apr 2012 #7
Like the Titanic the rich managed to get off the boat Rosa Luxemburg Apr 2012 #45
Get it right ACCER70 Apr 2012 #55
Down sparky. No need to be so nasty to people with your first post. Ruby the Liberal Apr 2012 #57
... TBF Apr 2012 #58
He should know nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #6
He knows from experience? nt killbotfactory Apr 2012 #8
He's half right meow2u3 Apr 2012 #10
Ding, ding, ding! Wish I could rec your post. People like Romney give coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #11
They are always Projecting LarryNM Apr 2012 #14
Ding Ding Award! graywarrior Apr 2012 #26
Yeah, that's the other half of my post #38 below. All of us are just supposed to take whatever patrice Apr 2012 #39
maybe because the Romney's only had sons Bluerthanblue Apr 2012 #13
Almost makes you think Hilary Rosen set him up. Scuba Apr 2012 #15
Is he referring to Govt healthcare though or husband welfare??? cbdo2007 Apr 2012 #17
Arbeit macht frei (See, it IS better in the orginal German) Democrats_win Apr 2012 #20
Exactly! TahitiNut Apr 2012 #23
It's not you. nt laundry_queen Apr 2012 #32
I just copied, pasted and printed the quote you posted here. classof56 Apr 2012 #53
I find him very scary PatSeg Apr 2012 #34
Thanks for posting this. classof56 Apr 2012 #54
so, about your boys.... SemperEadem Apr 2012 #21
Self-contradictory nonsense: surrealAmerican Apr 2012 #22
"hardworking parents raise hardworking kids" AlbertCat Apr 2012 #50
Have any of the cable networks picked up on this? ecstatic Apr 2012 #24
"Indolent"? Proud Liberal Dem Apr 2012 #28
Newt's gotten in his head. jp11 Apr 2012 #30
Translation - "What's up with people refusing to work for poverty wages?" hedgehog Apr 2012 #33
He is also speaking in code along racial lines. dixiegrrrrl Apr 2012 #44
Is he explainining his sons in this passage? n/t Gore1FL Apr 2012 #35
smarmy romney doubles down on his stupidity. nt Javaman Apr 2012 #36
Well, he is unemployed by his own admission and he doesn't think SAHMs work. AllyCat Apr 2012 #37
The CULTURAL mandate is that you SELL YOUR SOUL. Work does not need to be the right work patrice Apr 2012 #38
because being a burger flipper pays the bills and that's all you need, AlbertCat Apr 2012 #51
Except for the privileged few... limpyhobbler Apr 2012 #60
OIL KINGS and Aristocrats. patrice Apr 2012 #62
So them I can count on Romney to support... krispos42 Apr 2012 #40
That Is An Inflamitory Bias Romney Is Expressing, Not A Fact DallasNE Apr 2012 #41
Like GW Bush sulphurdunn Apr 2012 #42
Rec Al covered that and this malaise Apr 2012 #43
"Arbeit macht frei"......Romney's campaign slogan Namvet67 Apr 2012 #46
No. That's rich dudes who spoil their children. YellowRubberDuckie Apr 2012 #47
Just say it Rmoney . . . Eugenics! siligut Apr 2012 #48
"Indolent and unproductive " . Is he describing himself? sinkingfeeling Apr 2012 #49
The children of the poor are "indolent" - hedgehog Apr 2012 #52
He is such a piece of shit. Iris Apr 2012 #56
yes he is a turd sandwich. nt limpyhobbler Apr 2012 #61
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"NO APOLOGY" Ro...»Reply #55