Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Why do we need control of the Senate? Because of the Court, of course, of course . . . Journeyman Oct 2014 #1
Well, Obama could use recess appointments? And, surely we could Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #2
The Constitution limits recess appointments. merrily Oct 2014 #8
yes..appointment valid until end of next session But majority Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #11
And, of course, the issue is way beyond Obama. merrily Oct 2014 #13
not on judges dsc Oct 2014 #39
Confirmations don't go through the House and 60 votes for cloture is a problem in the Senate on merrily Oct 2014 #5
Because very bad things will happen if we don't. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #3
forgive me but...how would they get 2/3 majority to Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #4
Of course, some Dems would cave. Maybe starting with Hillary, if she becomes President. merrily Oct 2014 #6
They would control Congress, both houses, and could defund many, many federal programs as leverage. geek tragedy Oct 2014 #15
More voter suppression approved. The end. jwirr Oct 2014 #18
This is the dilemma since the New Deal Coalition ended and since Democrats lost the Solid South. merrily Oct 2014 #7
Yes. It is sad...instead of hoping for great things to Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #9
Stopping people from doing things, good or bad, is gridlock. merrily Oct 2014 #10
No wonder people have tuned out. Saw someone ask people Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #12
Item #1 in a Republican controlled Senate: Repeal the filibuster. world wide wally Oct 2014 #14
It would take a Super Majority to repeal the ACA. Impeachment B Calm Oct 2014 #22
Obama could be impeached today demwing Oct 2014 #24
Great reason to stay home. JoePhilly Oct 2014 #16
apparently. you miss the point nt Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #20
No, I think I cut right to it. JoePhilly Oct 2014 #21
And I voted gay D in Oregon early last week. Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #28
No, sorry, JP...just trying to understand exactly where Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #36
There is no point BeyondGeography Oct 2014 #26
total bullshit. Why did this morph into I don't want us to win. Geez Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #35
Welp one step closer to the visual display of the use of private prison round up. lonestarnot Oct 2014 #17
Shhhhhh.. kentuck Oct 2014 #19
Right now the Senate stops lots of bad bills from hitting the Presidenys desk Lee-Lee Oct 2014 #23
This is one of several, excellent and legitimate reasons demwing Oct 2014 #25
thanks. two thoughtful responses. nt Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #37
It's largely about 2016. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #27
Veto perspective, combining pocket vetos and regular vetos: Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #29
yup, and that's also one reason I worry that Erich Bloodaxe BSN Oct 2014 #30
Or it could be seen as a remarkable amount of room to move, plenty of vetos on that table Bluenorthwest Oct 2014 #32
Even if we had 60 Solid Liberals in the Senate it still would not be enough of a majority Youdontwantthetruth Oct 2014 #31
If you're an environmental non-profit looking at witch hunts led by James Inhofe's EPA BeyondGeography Oct 2014 #33
good point...thanks BG Laura PourMeADrink Oct 2014 #38
The silver lining lies in keeping a House of Congress from full GOP control... Orsino Oct 2014 #34
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I want us to retain contr...»Reply #16