Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Would a WPA really work today? (pic heavy) [View all]Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)3. I know people in their fifties that still do that sort of work every day..
And more that would if the work was available, the construction industry has been hit really hard by the popping of the housing bubble.
Much more power equipment these day than there was then, some things have to still be done by hand but not as many.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
34 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
And that may be why it won't work, but let's just say for the sake of discussion that the government
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#12
I used to work construction as a kid during the summer to make a few a good amount of money.
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#11
Makes sense. Like H1B Visas. People just coming here to make a better life. nt
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#30
Think of the workforce we'd have if we would reduce our military to something reasonable.
RC
Apr 2012
#14
Good question. Wonderful pics. Many of the ones helped in the original WPA and CCCamps were
jwirr
Apr 2012
#16
A lot of those dams were ecological disasters. I'm glad those take a long time to review. nt
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#19
The ecological cost was way too high. I'm sorry, people were never meant to live or play
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#32
There you go I proved my point. If the Shenandoah National Park and the Skyline Drive weren't
doc03
Apr 2012
#33
Probably not, but why not triple the number of US Park Service and Forest Service employees instead?
FSogol
Apr 2012
#23