Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Really Newsweek? [View all]
Really Newsweek? [View all] kpete Apr 2012 OP
This can't be real. chollybocker Apr 2012 #1
here also, right hand side, "On The Cover" : steve2470 Apr 2012 #2
Note how they make it seem sexy and good with such a knock out woman? Lionessa Apr 2012 #3
Exactly, that pic shows a very skinny model, not at all representative Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #12
I think you're missing my point. Lionessa Apr 2012 #21
I get it. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #24
Women have to be pornworthy these days... ananda Apr 2012 #46
This is a very astute observation lunatica Apr 2012 #47
yup lunatica and ananda. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #55
+1000 Blue_Tires Apr 2012 #58
Is there a ship off this planet? Zalatix Apr 2012 #4
Yes, but it's owned by Newt Gingrich. Pick your poison. n/t LadyHawkAZ Apr 2012 #35
As opposed to the secret fantasy life of working men Rex Apr 2012 #5
+1 for faulsauce flamingdem Apr 2012 #8
I cannot believe they are towing the M$Ms line. Rex Apr 2012 #11
haha! The writer and editor were fetishists who had themselves some plywood in Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #13
Well if they were thinking about powerful women secretly wanting Rex Apr 2012 #20
Maybe they are afraid of the Anna Wintours of the world nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #25
I find Anna Wintour pretty frightening :) Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #28
I find Anna Wintour pretty frightening :) Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #28
You must, you must!!! Rex Apr 2012 #33
Once for that wig, the other for those bug shades Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #37
Perhaps you haven't heard who is running Newsweek, these days. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #70
She majored in sensationalism. She's clearly selling the magazine to men. Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #76
She's selling the magazine to men? Really? Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #78
The cover shows a frumpy Queen of England? Or a skinny female playing victim in a sexual fetish Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #79
Like I said, I'd be interested to see what the demographics are pre and post Tina Brown takeover. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #81
Do you think that showing women naked or in sexualized poses is done because for women? nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #83
I see a woman with a tie wrapped around her head. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #84
Then I do believe you have been entirely too sheltered, if all you see is a scarf. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #85
I see a tie, not a scarf. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #86
If all you see is a tie, then you have been unduly sheltered. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #87
Yep. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #88
:) That's ok. Trust me though, that cover is not about fashion. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #89
I know, it's about 50 shades of grey and cheesy bondage porn aimed at women. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #90
It's never too late. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #91
Isn't Tina Brown editing that thing? MADem Apr 2012 #18
That bosomy Brit vulgarian is indeed editing that thing Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #27
Well it is all about selling...ahem news. Rex Apr 2012 #34
You mean, ah, "working men" ...with names like Tina Brown? Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #38
She also wrecked The New Yorker; took it from midcult to lower-midcult Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #50
I am as surprised as you are. Rex Apr 2012 #59
I cancelled my subscription, because I now find it nearly unreadable. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #69
Looks like they are drinking the same kool-aid as the M$M. Rex Apr 2012 #75
This is so creepy flamingdem Apr 2012 #6
That woman never worked a day in her life BeyondGeography Apr 2012 #7
YOU WIN THE THREAD!!! MADem Apr 2012 #16
I hate everybody Lucy Goosey Apr 2012 #9
Fiction to you but reality to the characters in the stories. Kablooie Apr 2012 #31
I so don't believe this. Sex play is fun, whether it's one or the other playing alpha, but I Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #10
Maybe "overpower" = "show a little enthusiam for once Harry" flamingdem Apr 2012 #22
LOL! Maybe so. nt Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2012 #23
Funniest Comment On This Thread! ProfessorGAC Apr 2012 #53
Pro doms report that their most reliable customers are powerful men eridani Apr 2012 #41
Thanks for the insight on what is nolabels Apr 2012 #42
It's very true Marrah_G Apr 2012 #62
Man, if Helmut Newton's estate could claim all royalties due... Tom Ripley Apr 2012 #14
This shit was on TV the other day-- a woman was saying that all the "moms" MADem Apr 2012 #15
Looks more like a cover for Vogue. eom tawadi Apr 2012 #17
Sexist horseshit! Odin2005 Apr 2012 #19
I'm old enough to remember when Newsweek wrote about, well, the news. Ikonoklast Apr 2012 #26
Same here! Was trying to remember what year it was Rex Apr 2012 #36
Newsweak jumped the shark sarge43 Apr 2012 #40
I thought they folded a few years ago. GoCubsGo Apr 2012 #52
All this tells me is that the marketing whizzes at Vintage books are working overtime gauguin57 Apr 2012 #30
How about one on how "Tiger Moms love Bondage!" Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #39
Ah. Now I understand women. I'll show this to my wife so she'll submit to me. Kablooie Apr 2012 #32
Please Please PLEASE let this be The Onion Ship of Fools Apr 2012 #43
Working Girl: 2012 no_hypocrisy Apr 2012 #44
This is utter bullshit. ananda Apr 2012 #45
"Fifty Shades of Grey" is what inspired this article mainer Apr 2012 #48
Here's a review from the NYT - the Cinderella fantasy + spanking flamingdem Apr 2012 #54
Blown way out of proportion Iris Apr 2012 #49
Katie Roiphe, huh? That explains it. Chorophyll Apr 2012 #51
Ms. Roiphe is quite atrocious blogslut Apr 2012 #71
Sex sells magazines. MineralMan Apr 2012 #56
That cover creeps me out whatchamacallit Apr 2012 #57
Next week I wanna see MadrasT Apr 2012 #60
So do I. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #73
I can tell you why some women like it and why some men like it. Marrah_G Apr 2012 #61
That's what I was trying to say up thread. Iris Apr 2012 #63
It's one of the reasons why supermarket historical romance books are so popular. Marrah_G Apr 2012 #64
haha! Yes, exactly! Iris Apr 2012 #66
Exactly... tallahasseedem Apr 2012 #67
Really what? jp11 Apr 2012 #65
Never mind that in an S&M type sexual relationship, the Submissive is actually in control and holds Blaukraut Apr 2012 #68
I'm not going to tell consenting adults how to get or not get their jollies. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #72
The point is, what "soccer moms" or anyone else want in the bedroom Chorophyll Apr 2012 #74
I agree with both your points. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #77
I guess I sort of don't care about the sexuality of other people all that much. Chorophyll Apr 2012 #80
Ill be honest, I didnt read the whole thing. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Really Newsweek?»Reply #39