General Discussion

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)

25. If they're all that sincere and intense about their "service" why do we need to pay them?

Sat Apr 14, 2012, 09:30 PM

Apr 2012

And, why do they vote themselves pay raises for doing something they're so sincere and intense about? But, you may be right. I'm sure there are prostitutes who are sincere and intense about their work too.

"History has tried to teach us that we can't have good government under politicians. Now, to go and stick one at the very head of government couldn’t be wise." Mark Twain

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama and Biden Disappoint, and Blitzer is an Idiot [View all] liberalmike27 Apr 2012 OP

your right on...thanks movonne Apr 2012 #1

This is all about the women's vote and it being an election year lunatica Apr 2012 #2

and maybe SAHMs, like myself, thought obama and biden handled it well, and would have been bothered seabeyond Apr 2012 #3

Sad but true tularetom Apr 2012 #4

I agree 100%...Hey! Democrats! Women are not CHILDREN.... PassingFair Apr 2012 #5

They wouldn't recognize one of those if it slapped them in the butt. Beacool Apr 2012 #20

Don't let the door hit ya' on the ass tabasco Apr 2012 #24

What are you talking about??????? Beacool Apr 2012 #26

Christie's such an honest guy Whisp Apr 2012 #37

Oh, Please... WeekendWarrior Apr 2012 #6

They would never think to respond that way, because they're all swimming in wealth. Marr Apr 2012 #7

You are spot on, Mike. I didn't see this, but I know that tone of voice you mention.... Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #8

You expect professional politicians to defend someone who dares to point out the obvious? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #9

yeah bigtree Apr 2012 #13

Our public "servants" are paid by us and need to be held to account. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #16

it's ridiculous on its face bigtree Apr 2012 #22

If they're all that sincere and intense about their "service" why do we need to pay them? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #25

to compete with that monument to virtue bigtree Apr 2012 #28

I disagree. There was no point in feeding the faux outrage. AtomicKitten Apr 2012 #10

How dare he?....If I were Hilary Rosen I might say: whathehell Apr 2012 #11

no one made her apologize bigtree Apr 2012 #12

Please, most of our Dem "talking heads" were apologizing for her too. PassingFair Apr 2012 #21

You mean her "craven" need to save her job?..How very shameful. whathehell Apr 2012 #30

she's sucking up to her bosses on CNN, not capitulating to the WH bigtree Apr 2012 #31

You've TOTALLY misinterpreted my post, which I thought was rather clear. whathehell Apr 2012 #32

ha! I read your post correctly. bigtree Apr 2012 #33

Ha!..No you didn't read it correctly...Now you read it again. whathehell Apr 2012 #34

alright, you're probably correct bigtree Apr 2012 #35

Thank you, Sir... whathehell Apr 2012 #36

The spineless weaklings are just doing what they always do when SammyWinstonJack Apr 2012 #14

I just don't care enough about Hillary "former RIAA CEO and BP consultant" Rosen aikoaiko Apr 2012 #15

Reasonable Folks Understood What Rosen Meant indykatie1955 Apr 2012 #17

Hillary Rosen is a smug one-percenter who looks down rusty fender Apr 2012 #18

You mean Americans Elect Hilary Rosen? Seeing the phony outrage by the "activists".... Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #19

Well put, thank you. emulatorloo Apr 2012 #27

TOTALLY agree, what Blitzer did was bad BUT what "our" side did Raine Apr 2012 #23

"you don't see the repukes doing that to each other." Are you serious? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2012 #29