Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DCBob

(24,689 posts)
36. The fact there are some studies that have shown effect warrant further research.
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 05:37 PM
Apr 2012

Why is it necessary to come to a quick determination? You sound like a RWinger trying to dismiss global warming.

It's only what's ON the radio waves that makes one sick Ezlivin Apr 2012 #1
Radio waves carrying Rush Limbaugh have often made me vomit... rfranklin Apr 2012 #2
Radiohead for me. Vomiting within seconds of hearing Thom Yorke "sing" ANYTHING. Amerigo Vespucci Apr 2012 #47
+1 nt zappaman Apr 2012 #48
Heck, I should have been dead 30 years ago. Archae Apr 2012 #3
It probably depends on nebenaube Apr 2012 #4
I've got a lot of heavy metal in me guitar man Apr 2012 #30
Jury is not completely out with nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #5
*sigh* jeff47 Apr 2012 #10
I join you with your *sigh* zappaman Apr 2012 #13
Radiation from battery packages and a few other things nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #20
No, the statistics are already in. jeff47 Apr 2012 #25
Sure they are... why the WHO is still waiting for them nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #40
*double sigh* n/t zappaman Apr 2012 #43
LOL, digging youself into a fact free hole again? dionysus Apr 2012 #71
It's homeopathic EM radiation...nt SidDithers Apr 2012 #42
This message was self-deleted by its author Tesha Apr 2012 #59
Yup... SidDithers Apr 2012 #64
Radiation from battery packages? Would you care to try that one again? TheWraith Apr 2012 #61
Tell you what, take the issue with the World Health Organization nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #63
Suffice it to say, zappaman Apr 2012 #22
Cell phones transmit the receive frequencies of the base station, while retread Apr 2012 #29
When talking about biological systems, the difference between 812MHz and 824MHz is irrelevant. jeff47 Apr 2012 #35
Antennas are mounted on at least 100 ft towers. You do the math. retread Apr 2012 #39
The point is the constant exposure, not the greater power output at the antenna. (nt) jeff47 Apr 2012 #52
I know of no cell freq at 812. In the 850 band the offset is 45 mhz. Cripes I'm done arguing with retread Apr 2012 #41
Are you seriously trying to argue 800MHz is different from 850MHz in a biological system? jeff47 Apr 2012 #51
Here is a good overview. Mojorabbit Apr 2012 #46
These are actually conspiracies that were hatched by the aluminum manufacturers MrScorpio Apr 2012 #6
I agree wholly with you but intaglio Apr 2012 #7
Spot on. I like this thread. Dosage is important.... wandy Apr 2012 #17
And neither is in the same time zone as using a cellphone. (nt) Posteritatis Apr 2012 #18
Chemical saturated, hormone-soaked genetically modified highly processed food IS IS IS good for you Gibby Apr 2012 #8
Oh wow Aerows Apr 2012 #21
actually, you cannot support your data-free statement DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #9
You might wanna read your post. jeff47 Apr 2012 #11
nice cherrypicking, but inconclusive is inconclusive DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #12
Please point to any actual inconclusive results jeff47 Apr 2012 #19
I see. So an inconclusive result means lying scientists just want more grant money. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #23
No, the lie is that there are inconclusive results. jeff47 Apr 2012 #26
did you just call me a liar? DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #27
You appear to be quoting people. jeff47 Apr 2012 #28
Don't much want to talk to you anymore, as courage of convictions aren't a part of your character. DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #37
So sorry your alert fishing failed. jeff47 Apr 2012 #53
alert fishing? No. I was taking a measure of your character DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #55
It's off point garbage to ask for the evidence you claim to have? jeff47 Apr 2012 #56
Goodbye. Come back when you're able to talk about all the points I've brought up DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2012 #58
You still haven't posted the one thing I've been asking for jeff47 Apr 2012 #69
"possibly carcinogenic to humans" DCBob Apr 2012 #33
There has been more than a century of exposure. jeff47 Apr 2012 #34
The fact there are some studies that have shown effect warrant further research. DCBob Apr 2012 #36
Because there aren't studies that have shown effect in cell phones. jeff47 Apr 2012 #50
Maybe Im wrong but I thought there were some studies that showed effect. DCBob Apr 2012 #60
Oh please. Inverse square law applies to electromagnetic radiation. retread Apr 2012 #38
Yes it does....did it occur to you that people lived near TV and radio transmitters? jeff47 Apr 2012 #49
And chemtrails proud2BlibKansan Apr 2012 #14
Upon request I will repost Uncle Jacks guaranteed chemtrail removal recipe. n/t wandy Apr 2012 #16
Now don't go telling that to our red footed, tin hat wearing friends.... wandy Apr 2012 #15
If they collected the amount of data this quack claims they would NickB79 Apr 2012 #24
Not to mention how much RF/EMF that server farm would generate.... wandy Apr 2012 #31
The voices in my head beg to differ! DefenseLawyer Apr 2012 #32
Show me the dead radio workers is my response Canuckistanian Apr 2012 #44
I find it amusing that the deniers are just as fervent in their faith-based claims as the panickers. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #45
We're supposed to happily let woo replace science? jeff47 Apr 2012 #54
You are simply wrong. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #66
In today's lesson, you learn that not everything on the internet is true or up-to-date. jeff47 Apr 2012 #68
As I said, amusing. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #70
There are PLENTY of scientific methods that can link activities or substances to cancer Canuckistanian Apr 2012 #62
Fully agreed nadinbrzezinski Apr 2012 #65
I'm very relieved that you are not an Oncologist, and hope you are not making a living Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #67
Radio waves do not have the energy to damage DNA. That is a fact. Odin2005 Apr 2012 #57
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Reminder: Cell phones do ...»Reply #36