General Discussion

raindaddy

(1,370 posts)

21. Purging the party???

Fri Sep 26, 2014, 02:55 PM

Sep 2014

Isn't that what you're doing when you suggest someone is "outing themselves" because you think the source of the post is too liberal?
I noticed you had nothing to add as far as the content of the post... So what exactly are you trying to communicate other than you have some vague problem with the source? Maybe you could "out yourself" and suggest what specifically you didn't agree with and then there could be a real discussion.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

94 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder Leaves Office (Good Riddance) [View all] woo me with science Sep 2014 OP

Post removed Post removed Sep 2014 #1

Out himself as what? whatchamacallit Sep 2014 #7

Out himself as not a koolaid drinker, I guess. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #9

So we've come to this? raindaddy Sep 2014 #12

so there are no Moderate Democrats? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #13

so Moderate Democrats approve of illegal wars? leftstreet Sep 2014 #18

apparently Belgium Denmark France Great Brittian VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #19

LOL the UK's sending 6 Tornado GR4 bombers. Token n/t leftstreet Sep 2014 #22

and that proves YOUR point how? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #23

Response to your subject-change n/t leftstreet Sep 2014 #24

not a subject change at all..... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #25

sigh leftstreet Sep 2014 #27

and I disproved your contention VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #28

LOL leftstreet Sep 2014 #30

I tell thr truth....you just think its funny. VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #35

She has a history of doing that. nt Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2014 #75

Purging the party??? raindaddy Sep 2014 #21

not when i am not on the side of those that do VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #37

bwahahahahaha. cali Sep 2014 #46

As opposed to those who post articles geek tragedy Sep 2014 #59

The party is advancing raindaddy Sep 2014 #67

I don't follow? FlatStanley Sep 2014 #14

why not? Shouldn't Democrats be proud? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #20

I'm not into going along to get along. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #40

Exactly. Too bad all the "true progressives" can't put the effort into bashing the GOP that FSogol Sep 2014 #11

Right. Progressives on this site only bash Democrats and never bash Republicans. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #43

Some pseudo-'progressives' here do exactly that emulatorloo Sep 2014 #79

And what of the pseudo-democrats always FlatStanley Sep 2014 #81

The DCCC supports my liberal rep's campaign. As to DU emulatorloo Sep 2014 #84

The idea of buying Democratic disrupters seem a little paranoid to me. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #91

If you don't want to cooperate with those who don't entirely agree with you treestar Sep 2014 #93

You should educate yourself on Jill Stein and the Green Party. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #94

At least they are Democrats treestar Sep 2014 #88

A D is a D is slow slide to the right. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #90

Still part of your same party treestar Sep 2014 #92

There are some treestar Sep 2014 #87

That's probably true but I haven't seen it myself. FlatStanley Sep 2014 #89

That Rachel video was great! She went out and showed the TPer's ignorance! Great! freshwest Sep 2014 #73

yes. common dreams. a liberal site that we've been linking to for years and years. cali Sep 2014 #26

and I call myself Liberal ....but I am a realist VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #31

you can call yourself whatever you want. cali Sep 2014 #42

but there most certainly are Far Left Fringers VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #45

Dave Lindorff, the author of this drivel, geek tragedy Sep 2014 #56

I can call myself a tulip bulb but that doesn't make it so LondonReign2 Sep 2014 #55

People who share an outlook with Lindorff geek tragedy Sep 2014 #57

I made no comment wrt the article LondonReign2 Sep 2014 #60

Speaking of 'outing' oneself! sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #32

as a Democrat? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #38

Thanks, that is what I thought. The article is completely accurate regarding Holder's sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #49

Yes common dreams seriously? It must be a tad bit too liberal for your taste Autumn Sep 2014 #36

do you watch Dr Rachel Maddow at all? VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #39

No I don't watch TV. Haven't for years and not gonna start now. Autumn Sep 2014 #41

no wonder.... VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #44

I don't need to watch TV, I can get better informaion reading Liberal sites, like Common Dreams Autumn Sep 2014 #47

if you like conspiracy theories I suppose VanillaRhapsody Sep 2014 #51

conspiracy theories??? No I stay out of the creative speculation group Autumn Sep 2014 #53

I already asked that question 'what is incorrect in the article'. Apparently there is nothing sabrina 1 Sep 2014 #52

As far as I can tell from reading the article, the problem may be the lack Autumn Sep 2014 #54

This feeds right into the GOP hate machine. I won't do it! FarPoint Sep 2014 #2

Sadly we must not only fight voter apathy in this country but we also must fight blind allegiance rhett o rick Sep 2014 #29

Well.. sendero Sep 2014 #68

I think you are being too kind. Not only didn't he do what needed to be done, but he caused rhett o rick Sep 2014 #72

DURec leftstreet Sep 2014 #3

He was "just following orders". K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Sep 2014 #4

Or the exact opposite. woo me with science Sep 2014 #5

Long held the real Wellstone ruled Sep 2014 #6

The same people that love job destroying "free" trade deals, labor undercutting visas, austerity, TheKentuckian Sep 2014 #82

It was just time for him to make some real money. zeemike Sep 2014 #8

Yep. The job of Wall Street Toady and Hit Man woo me with science Sep 2014 #10

Wall st. owes him big time! Nobody guiltyof anything in financial collapse. dmosh42 Sep 2014 #16

Well, maybe too busy sending Birkenfeld up: woo me with science Sep 2014 #17

Wow! I never heard of this story before, only that UBS had settled. dmosh42 Sep 2014 #74

. MohRokTah Sep 2014 #15

It's like 5 Hour Energy drink, only it's more like 8 Hour Hate. randome Sep 2014 #33

I really don't see any hope on the horizon. Just sayin. nm rhett o rick Sep 2014 #34

Lindorff is a Paulbot and Obama hater extraordinaire geek tragedy Sep 2014 #48

No surprise there. nt Bobbie Jo Sep 2014 #64

Woo woo! Egnever Sep 2014 #50

Awesome post. 99Forever Sep 2014 #58

Holder could only operate in the tight cocoon of Wall Street and our Fascist culture . If he dared geretogo Sep 2014 #61

The system is corrupt. Those who serve the machine woo me with science Sep 2014 #63

If your conspiracy is true then citizenship requires revolution TheKentuckian Sep 2014 #65

Now we are publishing Ron Paul supporters???? msanthrope Sep 2014 #62

From another thread "Good Riddance" one of the repeated republican talking points Sheepshank Sep 2014 #66

This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Sep 2014 #69

Awww...you gave the DU Haters a sadz... Rex Sep 2014 #70

Amazing that such intense vitriol is directed at DU many times daily by people carolinayellowdog Sep 2014 #77

Some here know that it is a golden ticket, you can hate on DU all day long Rex Sep 2014 #80

Seems like they spend 18 or 20 hours a day on a site they despise QC Sep 2014 #83

But of course, any praise for an appointee would be praise for Obama and we can't have any of that. great white snark Sep 2014 #71

I will miss him. A fine AG! 3rdwaydem Sep 2014 #76

A few more Dems like Holder and our "Lesser Evil" status will be in jeopardy nt Teamster Jeff Sep 2014 #78

May I say that this is very silly. ucrdem Sep 2014 #85

Maybe Holder will have time now to take some remedial courses in constitutional law. Vattel Sep 2014 #86