General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So will DU let the facts in the Zimmerman case be presented? [View all]BzaDem
(11,142 posts)Innocent before proven guilty is a principle of our legal system. It is not to make independent analysis a thoughtcrime. It is not meant to imply a suppression on speech or thought, even as a judgement call.
Every day, people get arrested. News about that arrest spreads far and wide. People look at the evidence, and they can't help but put together the information in their head.
Aggregating information in your head, and posting about that information, is not necessarily a bad thing. Discussion is not a bad thing. What would be a bad thing is if the jurors on the case followed the case in advance and were predisposed to make a particular verdict. But our legal system is very good at getting an untainted jury. I still think more people here would be outraged if someone who they thought was guilty didn't get a fair trial.
In any case, I think if he was arrested at the time, there would not be nearly the controversy.