Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I Support The Actions Described By President Obama Tonight, Ladies And Gentlemen [View all]Cha
(291,704 posts)143. Vid of the President's statement, TM.. and the transcript.. thank you.
Good evening. Today I authorized two operations in Iraq targeted airstrikes to protect our American personnel, and a humanitarian effort to help save thousands of Iraqi civilians who are trapped on a mountain without food and water and facing almost certain death. Let me explain the actions were taking and why.
First, I said in June as the terrorist group ISIL began an advance across Iraq that the United States would be prepared to take targeted military action in Iraq if and when we determined that the situation required it. In recent days, these terrorists have continued to move across Iraq, and have neared the city of Erbil, where American diplomats and civilians serve at our consulate and American military personnel advise Iraqi forces.
To stop the advance on Erbil, Ive directed our military to take targeted strikes against ISIL terrorist convoys should they move toward the city. We intend to stay vigilant, and take action if these terrorist forces threaten our personnel or facilities anywhere in Iraq, including our consulate in Erbil and our embassy in Baghdad. Were also providing urgent assistance to Iraqi government and Kurdish forces so they can more effectively wage the fight against ISIL.
Second, at the request of the Iraqi government weve begun operations to help save Iraqi civilians stranded on the mountain. As ISIL has marched across Iraq, it has waged a ruthless campaign against innocent Iraqis. And these terrorists have been especially barbaric towards religious minorities, including Christian and Yezidis, a small and ancient religious sect. Countless Iraqis have been displaced. And chilling reports describe ISIL militants rounding up families, conducting mass executions, and enslaving Yezidi women.
In recent days, Yezidi women, men and children from the area of Sinjar have fled for their lives. And thousands perhaps tens of thousands are now hiding high up on the mountain, with little but the clothes on their backs. Theyre without food, theyre without water. People are starving. And children are dying of thirst. Meanwhile, ISIL forces below have called for the systematic destruction of the entire Yezidi people, which would constitute genocide. So these innocent families are faced with a horrible choice: descend the mountain and be slaughtered, or stay and slowly die of thirst and hunger.
Ive said before, the United States cannot and should not intervene every time theres a crisis in the world. So let me be clear about why we must act, and act now. When we face a situation like we do on that mountain with innocent people facing the prospect of violence on a horrific scale, when we have a mandate to help in this case, a request from the Iraqi government and when we have the unique capabilities to help avert a massacre, then I believe the United States of America cannot turn a blind eye. We can act, carefully and responsibly, to prevent a potential act of genocide. Thats what were doing on that mountain.
Ive, therefore, authorized targeted airstrikes, if necessary, to help forces in Iraq as they fight to break the siege of Mount Sinjar and protect the civilians trapped there. Already, American aircraft have begun conducting humanitarian airdrops of food and water to help these desperate men, women and children survive. Earlier this week, one Iraqi in the area cried to the world, There is no one coming to help. Well today, America is coming to help. Were also consulting with other countries and the United Nations who have called for action to address this humanitarian crisis.
I know that many of you are rightly concerned about any American military action in Iraq, even limited strikes like these. I understand that. I ran for this office in part to end our war in Iraq and welcome our troops home, and thats what weve done. As Commander-in-Chief, I will not allow the United States to be dragged into fighting another war in Iraq. And so even as we support Iraqis as they take the fight to these terrorists, American combat troops will not be returning to fight in Iraq, because theres no American military solution to the larger crisis in Iraq. The only lasting solution is reconciliation among Iraqi communities and stronger Iraqi security forces.
However, we can and should support moderate forces who can bring stability to Iraq. So even as we carry out these two missions, we will continue to pursue a broader strategy that empowers Iraqis to confront this crisis. Iraqi leaders need to come together and forge a new government that represents the legitimate interests of all Iraqis, and that can fight back against the threats like ISIL. Iraqis have named a new President, a new Speaker of Parliament, and are seeking consensus on a new Prime Minister. This is the progress that needs to continue in order to reverse the momentum of the terrorists who prey on Iraqs divisions.
Once Iraq has a new government, the United States will work with it and other countries in the region to provide increased support to deal with this humanitarian crisis and counterterrorism challenge. None of Iraqs neighbors have an interest in this terrible suffering or instability.
And so well continue to work with our friends and allies to help refugees get the shelter and food and water they so desperately need, and to help Iraqis push back against ISIL. The several hundred American advisors that I ordered to Iraq will continue to assess what more we can do to help train, advise and support Iraqi forces going forward. And just as I consulted Congress on the decisions I made today, we will continue to do so going forward.
My fellow Americans, the world is confronted by many challenges. And while America has never been able to right every wrong, America has made the world a more secure and prosperous place. And our leadership is necessary to underwrite the global security and prosperity that our children and our grandchildren will depend upon. We do so by adhering to a set of core principles. We do whatever is necessary to protect our people. We support our allies when theyre in danger. We lead coalitions of countries to uphold international norms. And we strive to stay true to the fundamental values the desire to live with basic freedom and dignity that is common to human beings wherever they are. Thats why people all over the world look to the United States of America to lead. And thats why we do it.
So let me close by assuring you that there is no decision that I take more seriously than the use of military force. Over the last several years, we have brought the vast majority of our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan. And Ive been careful to resist calls to turn time and again to our military, because America has other tools in our arsenal than our military. We can also lead with the power of our diplomacy, our economy, and our ideals.
But when the lives of American citizens are at risk, we will take action. Thats my responsibility as Commander-in-Chief. And when many thousands of innocent civilians are faced with the danger of being wiped out, and we have the capacity to do something about it, we will take action. That is our responsibility as Americans. Thats a hallmark of American leadership. Thats who we are.
So tonight, we give thanks to our men and women in uniform - especially our brave pilots and crews over Iraq who are protecting our fellow Americans and saving the lives of so many men, women and children that they will never meet. They represent American leadership at its best. As a nation, we should be proud of them, and of our countrys enduring commitment to uphold our own security and the dignity of our fellow human beings.
God bless our Armed Forces, and God bless the United States of America.
TOD
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
350 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

I Support The Actions Described By President Obama Tonight, Ladies And Gentlemen [View all]
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
OP
Where are they getting their weapons? And does mean that we will completely give up
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#152
Damn, Sir: When A Fella From 'American Thinker' Is The Voice Of Reason, Someone Has A Problem....
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
#226
The source of my information comes from the British Parliament. I do not freguent nor am I
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#329
I read real news not right wingnut sites. The British Parliament voted against
sabrina 1
Aug 2014
#340
As a desert storm vet... No, not even close to being worth involved again.
Katashi_itto
Aug 2014
#349
Airstrikes on Isis should they make any hostile and overt moves towards Embassy
Sheepshank
Aug 2014
#252
I do too. He is a class act and a smart man. I don't always agree with him but it is a joy to....
Logical
Aug 2014
#4
Yes, a bad situation but Pres. Obama is doing the right thing. The Bush legacy. nt
Cognitive_Resonance
Aug 2014
#20
You're not accusing all 40k humans there of that particular crime, are you? n/t
Amonester
Aug 2014
#30
Well, maybe the relatively small 'group' (compared to 40,000...) who did it were killed later? Or no
Amonester
Aug 2014
#71
But there wasn't 40,000 people there, so you still insist to let them all starve so you will be
Amonester
Aug 2014
#132
This post is living proof that right wingers are not the only ones capable of sanctimony.
bklyncowgirl
Aug 2014
#209
I'm not so sure I can agree, nor can I trust those representing me that have proven
AuntPatsy
Aug 2014
#32
Missed it. Did he do something brave, like send food/medical aid to injured and dying in Gaza?
whereisjustice
Aug 2014
#34
Thanks. From the praise, sounded like he was pulling children from the rubble with his own hands
whereisjustice
Aug 2014
#59
The Iraqi Air Force doesn't have the capability to air drop supplies to those trapped people,
IronGate
Aug 2014
#109
We have already dropped the supplies. The Iraq gov.& the people trapped asked for the help.
Sunlei
Aug 2014
#114
Really? What good people will die because of targeted air strikes against ISIS? nt.
IronGate
Aug 2014
#91
The air strikes would only commence if ISIS were showing signs of moving against those people
IronGate
Aug 2014
#104
And you think there will not be even one civilian casualty? Only ISIS fighters? Really? nt
kelly1mm
Aug 2014
#156
Nope, not our problem any more. They did not want a SOFA agreement and thus no more
kelly1mm
Aug 2014
#162
@BreakingNews: Iraqi official says hundreds of Yazidi women taken captive by Islamic State militants
Hissyspit
Aug 2014
#280
@wikileaks: US let ISIS grow: In 2010 Syria offered to partner with US to fight groups like ISIS but
Hissyspit
Aug 2014
#301
@wikileaks: Stratfor leak shows US created ISIS (ISI) leadership structure and thirst for revenge af
Hissyspit
Aug 2014
#304
I am always skeptical of this sort of thing and would like to see Maliki replaced,
BillZBubb
Aug 2014
#78
One might think we've been completely overrun by a bunch of self centered Libertarians, who sit....
Tarheel_Dem
Aug 2014
#292
How about we throw that Trillion $/year weight of our M/I complex into a massive humanitarian effort
Warren DeMontague
Aug 2014
#133
Humanitarian aid is always good. Targeted air strikes is code for killing people. Of course
rhett o rick
Aug 2014
#142
You invalidated your whole post when you compared our President to Kimg Jong-il. nt
conservaphobe
Aug 2014
#155
So we shouldn't try to prevent the genocide of these people by the terrorist army ISIS?
IronGate
Aug 2014
#169
Had You Opened On The Line Of Your Second Attempt, Sir, Matters Would Have Gone Differently
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
#178
So, I'm hearing.. via sites like these. I thought they were out of control in 2002.. and,
Cha
Aug 2014
#192
I suppose it is probably the right thing to do given the current realities. Unfortunately we do not
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2014
#203
If you are going to use a criminal justice metaphor, its more like police shooting a criminal who is
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#236
Because There Are Occasions, Sir, When Violence Is Both Appropriate And Necessary
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
#328
Really? 'Cuz I think there's nothing more amusing than self-righteous pomposity & condescension
TheSarcastinator
Aug 2014
#233
They are all bad options now. I just dont want more troops sent at this point.
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#239
What is amusing is the pathetic arguments of those criticizing you. As if they have a better option.
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#242
I Suppose One Could Ask, Sir, If Such Are Willing To Stand Themselves Among The Potential Victims
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
#243
We still made a bad decision in 1991. But it was the post-war, not pre-war, decision.
ieoeja
Aug 2014
#288
I strongly disagree. Saddam taking babies from incubators! Yeah, right.....
Dems to Win
Aug 2014
#256
Your focusing on the most ridiculous in a long line of reasons doesn't help your cause.
stevenleser
Aug 2014
#261
How about Iraq's 1980 invasion of Iran? In which the US supported the invader.
Dems to Win
Aug 2014
#298
These adventures tend to start from a justifiable case and grow into shit. Often being shit from
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#246
We are aiding affiliate factions inarguably, Sir. I believe the distinction is without much
TheKentuckian
Aug 2014
#331
Equally, Sir, Easy To Oppose It When You Are Not The One Designated For Massacre
The Magistrate
Aug 2014
#259
Most of us knew regime change in 2003 would lead to exactly what we are seeing today.
ieoeja
Aug 2014
#291
So, which CEOs are going to make a killing off our newest muder spree in Iraq???
blkmusclmachine
Aug 2014
#281
I heard ISIS throws babies from incubators & just bought yellow cake from Niger
TheSarcastinator
Aug 2014
#338