Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
That study is STILL garbage mathematic Jul 2014 #1
ROFL... SidDithers Jul 2014 #2
Is it just me or is "Alternet" getting worse and worse? snooper2 Jul 2014 #3
Sadly, science reporting on the left is almost as bad as it is on the right...nt SidDithers Jul 2014 #4
On this I must agree. MohRokTah Jul 2014 #26
I've never trusted their content Bonx Jul 2014 #16
wow G_j Jul 2014 #5
No, we've just seen this garbage posted several times already...nt SidDithers Jul 2014 #6
ROFL G_j Jul 2014 #8
You're the one characterizing this as a major study... SidDithers Jul 2014 #9
If one guys can pay so much then wisechoice Jul 2014 #38
I think it's partly that "where's our jetpacks? their absence means SOMEBODY is to blame!" MisterP Jul 2014 #13
gawd I wish this nonsense would die permanently.... mike_c Jul 2014 #7
It won't... SidDithers Jul 2014 #10
You have a point. Since GMO corn is used so widely, Damansarajaya Jul 2014 #35
"We" didn't see the increase in obesity, diabetes and cancer? KurtNYC Jul 2014 #42
Hmmm . . . good data. I'm not a GMO fan. Damansarajaya Jul 2014 #45
Soda is GMO corn (HFCS) which is designed to be loaded with most easily absorbed sugar -- fructose KurtNYC Jul 2014 #47
Post removed Post removed Jul 2014 #15
I thought I had read the rats were predisposed to tumors! MohRokTah Jul 2014 #27
Alan McHughen frustrated_lefty Jul 2014 #31
Yay! More crappy science!! jeff47 Jul 2014 #11
Nailed it... SidDithers Jul 2014 #12
Do critics of this publication have evidence that current testing standards are optimal? Faryn Balyncd Jul 2014 #14
Do you have evidence that they aren't? jeff47 Jul 2014 #19
Any study showing long term effects of wisechoice Jul 2014 #39
Yes. It's called everyone around you. jeff47 Jul 2014 #46
It appears you have not read either the article or the study: Faryn Balyncd Jul 2014 #50
The study's sample size was too small to make heads or tails out of the data. Avalux Jul 2014 #17
They should redo the study... SidDithers Jul 2014 #18
How about wisechoice Jul 2014 #43
But . . . how does that herbicide affect humans? Petrushka Jul 2014 #20
It affects them poorly. Pesticides also affect humans poorly. jeff47 Jul 2014 #21
Wow, what excellent advice for systemic pesticides! /sarcasm appal_jack Jul 2014 #23
That sounds serious Babel_17 Jul 2014 #25
Here is one on neonics & bird declines: appal_jack Jul 2014 #28
Here's some discussion of problems from using RoundUp to dry down wheat: appal_jack Jul 2014 #29
RoundUp Ready GMO's contributing to Monarch decline: appal_jack Jul 2014 #30
RoundUp & its adjuvants killing amphibians: appal_jack Jul 2014 #32
Neonic pesticides implicated in bat die-offs: appal_jack Jul 2014 #33
Extinction is indeed serious. appal_jack Jul 2014 #34
I only buy non-Monsanto altered products Babel_17 Jul 2014 #36
I agree about rational choice vs. intrinsic opposition. appal_jack Jul 2014 #49
So change the subject, and then attack the strawman for changing the subject. jeff47 Jul 2014 #44
Good Luck with your Monarchs coming back, appal jack! Thanks for your posts not promoting Cha Jul 2014 #48
serious buisiness.. G_j Jul 2014 #22
The truth: Seralini is the Andrew Wakefield of biology. alp227 Jul 2014 #24
Tracing back the source it goes to this...http://www.elsevier.com/ Rex Jul 2014 #37
The Seralini study was originallyh published in the Elsevier journal Food and Chemical Toxicology... SidDithers Jul 2014 #40
Okay thanks, yeah they wouldn't retract anything factual or I wouldn't think so. Rex Jul 2014 #41
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Republished study: GMO Co...»Reply #32