Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Re:Chelsea Clinton: Did peoples' spin-detectors suddenly short out? [View all]JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)35. No. It's about Chelsea's words and the huge difference between what rich people
enjoy and most working kids of today can't -- like a modicum of financial security and being able to have kids, a steady job, maybe buy a house.
It's about the extreme economic inequality in our society.
Compare that to Elizabeth Warren's campaign to lower interest rates on student loans. Elizabeth Warren knows which way the wind is blowing. She studied bankruptcy and understands the frustrations of today's young people who work just as hard as Chelsea but will be paying back college debt for a long time. Most young American college graduates today do not have the liberty of not caring about money. Most of them are indentured by their student loans.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
96 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I think the real problem is that many many voters - not DUers - will only see the spin.
djean111
Jun 2014
#2
Basically it's all about perception. You already have a negative view of the Clintons, so you assume
Metric System
Jun 2014
#5
Is it really ridiculous to ask for the information that informs one's opinion? eom.
1StrongBlackMan
Jun 2014
#46
No. It's about Chelsea's words and the huge difference between what rich people
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#35
your suggesting she should have gotten a job with a hedge fund as a teenager? HA
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#77
well you suggested her money chasing rebellion should have happened as a teen- so what exactly was
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#80
oh, it's an over simplistic generalization used to imply she is lying about her reasons for choosing
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#85
So I suppose if you asked someone that quit being a chef why they quit and they said
Chathamization
Jun 2014
#31
You mean sort of like censoring things to repeat one's own version of the Democratic Party line.
JDPriestly
Jun 2014
#28
Well, I have met poor people whose values were centered around things other than money.
cheapdate
Jun 2014
#66
when it comes to the clintons, some people's brains turn off completely (in both directions)
La Lioness Priyanka
Jun 2014
#34
This is how truly privileged people (and their hangers on) think about themselves... nt
Romulox
Jun 2014
#71
How much did she make there I wonder? It also occurs to me that maybe, perhaps maybe,
Dragonfli
Jun 2014
#94
yeah, if they had a Dean scream moment, some here would be the first to attack for it
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#82
privilege is something every candidate has obtained along their way to the nomination, so......
bettyellen
Jun 2014
#91