Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: New Statesman : Why Elizabeth Warren should take on Hillary Clinton and run for the US presidency [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)46. Hillary runs dirty, she will attempt to savage Elizabeth Warren
It's a good thing she can take it! The good news is Hillary's supporters are all big time bankers and there are not many of them so it is a small voting block. She does have a lot of banking groupies among third way Dems however which will guarantee some really viscous attacks on Warren that will backfire just like the racist shit she pulled backfired last time big money ran her.
It would be the primary of Goldman Sachs vs those that hate big money crooks (the 99%). They have the money but that is all they have and $$$ does not translate into likability.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
69 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
New Statesman : Why Elizabeth Warren should take on Hillary Clinton and run for the US presidency [View all]
mylye2222
Jun 2014
OP
I like her a lot but she let me see something during her interview with Chris Matthews.
kelliekat44
Jun 2014
#49
you are so wrong...warren and any democrat that can branded batshit crazy liberal will LOSE
beachbum bob
Jun 2014
#33
Warren isn't running, and she made very clear if Hillary runs she will support her. The only way
lostincalifornia
Jun 2014
#7
The debate would be good, but any dragging of Hillary to the left would be just for show.
djean111
Jun 2014
#12
I think HRC has made her choice. She knows the left is lost to her. She has to try
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#58
I do not agree we need a third party. We need to take back control of our Democratic Party
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#61
I agree with you in spirit, but in practice, Wall Street owns the Democratic party,
djean111
Jun 2014
#63
But nothing would make the oligarchs happier than to splinter off the left into a third party.
rhett o rick
Jun 2014
#64
Though I can appreciate supporting Democratic candidates in upcoming elections there is a time we
Thinkingabout
Jun 2014
#11
She's got my vote and I haven't volunteered for a campaign since McGovern, but I am ready.
marble falls
Jun 2014
#23
Ms. Warren is not running. I believe she's bright enough not to take this or any other bait.
mulsh
Jun 2014
#24
She can lose and remain in the senate as John Kerry did. Running, we can have a real conversation.
TheNutcracker
Jun 2014
#26
Yup. And so should Bernie Sanders. We need more liberal progressive voices "out there" K&R
riderinthestorm
Jun 2014
#38
I do not believe that "Dems are majority hoping for Hillary" I think the Majority of Dems
Vincardog
Jun 2014
#39
I want Warren, Sanders, whoever, to run just as Clinton is running and DEBATE everything!
freshwest
Jun 2014
#50