Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Contrast pre-Iraq war views of Bob Graham and the Clintons. We need to remember. [View all]bigtree
(85,984 posts)31. the last quotes were fine. They referred to Iraqis taking responsibility for their own security
. . . you are really straining to find differences here, fact is, Hillary didn't like or agree with what Bush ultimately did in Iraq and wanted the occupation to end like everyone else.
I don't understand this ragging on her for that; legitimate to criticize her vote and her rationale for believing Bush - way off the mark and over the top criticizing her resolve to end the occupation.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
77 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Contrast pre-Iraq war views of Bob Graham and the Clintons. We need to remember. [View all]
madfloridian
Jun 2014
OP
it remains to be seen which will recover first - this country from reagan or the dem party from the
KG
Jun 2014
#1
She is shameless. and contemptible and Clinton engages in raw historical revisionism.
cali
Jun 2014
#2
how are you going to vote for her if she wins the Primary while speaking the heinous stuff
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#13
I opine. You call it "spewing"- which is fine. Your opinion is worth little to me.
cali
Jun 2014
#17
you don't opine....you spew vile hatred of the woman day in and day out....
VanillaRhapsody
Jun 2014
#61
you're accusing her of revisionism using a mix of charges from a right wing source
bigtree
Jun 2014
#36
no. I pointing to your reliance on a well-known republican sympathizer for your 'facts'
bigtree
Jun 2014
#56
Let me help you out on Dick Morris and his lack of credibility toward the Clintons.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#73
it's not a shame, it's was inevitable. no enterprise based on such craven deceit could ever
KG
Jun 2014
#6
In October 2002 Bob Graham begged fellow senators to read the "entire" NIE on WMDs.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#5
This country does field serious candidates for the presidency that can unequivocally
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#16
Kucinich never made it through the primaries, I am unaffiliated so don't consider
A Simple Game
Jun 2014
#65
"When did we become a nation that ignores and berates our friends and calls them irrelevant?"
KeepItReal
Jun 2014
#11
That's why I have credibility in recognizing the same kind of adoration now.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#44
No, that is actually a materially different (though arguably a potentially equally stupid) position
TheKentuckian
Jun 2014
#42
Invading someone's country, killing and torturing their people, destroying their country AND
sabrina 1
Jun 2014
#28
that line about a lock isn't mine - but she's got a good start for the nomination
bigtree
Jun 2014
#34
the last quotes were fine. They referred to Iraqis taking responsibility for their own security
bigtree
Jun 2014
#31
This was a vote that affected all of us, affected the world's stability, our country's reputation.
madfloridian
Jun 2014
#49
She voted for the war because it was expedient. She apologized for her vote for the same reason.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2014
#50
And neva forget it; the last thing we need is anotha warmonger in the White House (biggest reason we chose Obama over Hillary).
InAbLuEsTaTe
Jun 2014
#76
When it comes to the Clintons, I really don't know what they believe...
Drunken Irishman
Jun 2014
#51
GTFO IS a good option. Then, help America lead by example, not violence. If we can ever lead again.
grahamhgreen
Jun 2014
#68