Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

badtoworse

(5,957 posts)

18. I'm very comfortable in my own skin.

Reply to Doctor_J (Reply #17)

Fri Mar 30, 2012, 08:21 AM

Mar 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

27 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Why the Supremes will rules 5-4 against ACA [View all] COLGATE4 Mar 2012 OP

Kennedy is always the swing vote... joeybee12 Mar 2012 #1

I'd probably agree with you, except that I'm not COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #5

Because SCOTUS is completely corrupt Doctor_J Mar 2012 #2

So what would you have done about 2000? badtoworse Mar 2012 #4

Someone, maybe, but not corrupt political hacks Doctor_J Mar 2012 #6

I don't agree with everything this court has done,... badtoworse Mar 2012 #8

Then I ask again, what would you consider cause to fight back? Doctor_J Mar 2012 #9

I don't see the electoral process the same way you do. badtoworse Mar 2012 #12

The election was stolen, and thanks for admitting Doctor_J Mar 2012 #17

I'm very comfortable in my own skin. badtoworse Mar 2012 #18

Agree 100% libtodeath Mar 2012 #19

And Slappy and Fat Tony are eminently impeachable. Doctor_J Mar 2012 #22

Well, we can thank Nader for the makeup of thise RW Supreme Court. I wish he would have gotton a demosincebirth Mar 2012 #3

+1,000 BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #7

I voted third party (not Nader) years ago and regret it. CTyankee Mar 2012 #11

Oh yeah.... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #14

well, I regret not voting for Jimmy Carter in that election. I really do. CTyankee Mar 2012 #15

Ted Kennedy. pushing through the trucking deregulation bill cost the trucking sector 300,000 demosincebirth Mar 2012 #25

Nader voters, maybe. Nader, why? Doctor_J Mar 2012 #10

Because if Nader hadn't siphoned off 97,000+ votes from Gore.... BlueDemKev Mar 2012 #13

Don't try and shift the blame for Gore's loss. It was f**king Nader and his groupies that demosincebirth Mar 2012 #27

They won't make a decision malaise Mar 2012 #16

no one knows...not even a professor spanone Mar 2012 #20

If it's 5-4, Obama will be able to rally the troops much easier than if it's 6-3 or 7-2. Arkana Mar 2012 #21

Rule of thumb with this SCOTUS... tjwash Mar 2012 #23

BINGO!!!!! We have a winner. COLGATE4 Mar 2012 #24

The insurance industry and big pharma will put tremendous pressure on the SC to leave it intact. Better Believe It Mar 2012 #26

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why the Supremes will rul...»Reply #18