Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hillary Clinton, the unrepentant hawk [View all]wyldwolf
(43,865 posts)79. who would I be trying to convince?
I know all their arguments and they know mine. Unless devastating new information is released about First Lady/Senator/Sec. of State Clinton, I see no reason to continue the same discussion (for last 10 years!)
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
110 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
yes. she might keep her own daughter and grandchild in mind before pulling the trigger on someone
roguevalley
Apr 2014
#32
The support was given and Bush was supposed to exhaust all avenues but he did not.
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#2
True facts needs to enter into reality, you are entitled to the facts, you must
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#13
So are you suggesting that Georgie Bush fooled Hillary Clinton?While most of the world was screaming
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#19
Where did I say Georgie Bush fooled Hillary Clinton? Don't write words I did not say
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#38
Since you were only insinuating and not coming out and saying anything, then I have
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#48
Let me say this one more time. A bill went before Congress to authorize war.
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#55
Go back to the facts, not what those like Rush or Sean would give, just the facts.
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#43
I can defend her with the facts, true facts are important. Always go with the facts.
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#57
Enough said, the facts are still the facts, you can continue to rework Bush
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#99
As you saidcas a last resort. Even before 9/11 Bush and Cheney was set to invade
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#64
If you are judging by fit, then she is your candidate, none of the others has as much
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#110
I agree, also there is not a perfect candidate. I have heard so many times this or that one is
Thinkingabout
Apr 2014
#75
Then you have no right to complain about anything. Might as well quit posting here. n/t
Avalux
Apr 2014
#9
I don't think that anyone is saying that Hillary, or anyone else for that matter,
Beacool
Apr 2014
#108
Oh plez not that already. If Clinton loses it's because some werent smart enough
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#23
Who do you think you are? You think you can tell anyone to quit posting here? Just trying to
ChisolmTrailDem
Apr 2014
#54
I never said I was a Hillary supporter. But I'll vote for her if it comes to that. n/t
Avalux
Apr 2014
#37
Nominate Clinton and enjoy 8 more years of Goldman-Sachs-O-Gold. Wall Street uber alles. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#49
Ted Cruz! Booga booga! Osama Bin Laden! Booga Booga! Terra!! Booga booga!
RufusTFirefly
Apr 2014
#25
The blame for that goes to the Party Leadership. If they provide and back candidates in accordance
sabrina 1
Apr 2014
#65
Ironically Citizens United will be a major force getting her nominated. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#53
Playing the "strong leader" has it's drawbacks. See LBJ for precedent.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Apr 2014
#14
I don't think she has any deep beliefs on war, foreign policy, what our
TwilightGardener
Apr 2014
#18
I had to look that up as I was unaware of the "make flag burning illegal bill" ...
Scuba
Apr 2014
#59
Yea who gives a shit about senators and representatives in Congress when there's a presidential
gtar100
Apr 2014
#28
True enough. But my impression is that this is far more a distraction than a help.
gtar100
Apr 2014
#45
Are you worried that it will distract us or yourself? If yourself, trash the threads. If it's us,
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#52
even they have read & heard it all. DU represents such a SMALL insignificant part of the electorate
wyldwolf
Apr 2014
#81
When I see articles like this, I just naturally think of 5 letters. C-R-E-E-P.
McCamy Taylor
Apr 2014
#68
You have lost it if you think these clear and legitimate concerns are new in any way.
TheKentuckian
Apr 2014
#85