Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WTF Is Going On At Bundy Ranch? Video of Dangerous Standoff With Authorities. Snipers too! [View all]VanillaRhapsody
(21,115 posts)53. that was Branch Davidians....
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
158 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
WTF Is Going On At Bundy Ranch? Video of Dangerous Standoff With Authorities. Snipers too! [View all]
Skip Intro
Apr 2014
OP
So if Bundy gets to take over that public land what is stopping my family (Native Americans) from
jwirr
Apr 2014
#110
There should be some clear documentation of who owns the land. Doesn't make sense to me.
Skip Intro
Apr 2014
#4
It's public land to which his permit to graze was revoked 21 years ago, FWIU.
Gravitycollapse
Apr 2014
#7
Hey I just wanted to tell you at first I read your thread title quickly and I
oneofthe99
Apr 2014
#11
The point about the drought is very good. A lot of SW ranchers are selling their cattle because the
jwirr
Apr 2014
#111
What he's been doing is blatantly illegal. But the police presence seems over the top.
Gravitycollapse
Apr 2014
#5
I would not put that outside the realm of possibility. Although, as with the Branch Davidians...
Gravitycollapse
Apr 2014
#19
I am not particularly sure that Julio (?) Gonzalez was handled right either.
yeoman6987
Apr 2014
#64
"target of the state"? You mean like every other person ever arrested for breaking the law?
hedgehog
Apr 2014
#85
Well, given that militias everywhere are using this story as an excuse to start a civil war
Downtown Hound
Apr 2014
#76
Didn't realize it had been through the courts. That makes a big difference. n/t
Skip Intro
Apr 2014
#13
Bundy is the last rancher standing. Funny, he has no rights but if one has
snappyturtle
Apr 2014
#38
Clark county is controlled by their 'unincorporated Clark County' casino companies.
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#94
It's still federal land, and Bundy owes more than 20 years of grazing fees on it.
Paladin
Apr 2014
#99
What took the government (BLM) so long? 20 years! The time is right for putting
snappyturtle
Apr 2014
#103
even if he is a RW rancher /w a sense of entitlement to our public lands..He still has the right to
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#107
And of course this has nothing to do with the drought conditions in both areas? By the way please
jwirr
Apr 2014
#120
Thank you. The aerial cattle count explains what the rw are talking about helicopters being used
jwirr
Apr 2014
#112
Our Gov charges some very cheap rate, its like 1.50 a month to graze on our public lands.
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#25
Snort, doesn't appear as though they eva wanna pay. They appear to believe they are owed more than
lonestarnot
Apr 2014
#98
Cordon off the area, sit back and let them stew in the heat under their tinfoil hats
Ex Lurker
Apr 2014
#42
Is it just me or does it seem like the government puts on the kid gloves for violent right wingers?
Taitertots
Apr 2014
#43
It's pretty simple, Wingnutjobs itching for a civil war are trying to provoke violent encounter.
MohRokTah
Apr 2014
#46
Southern Poverty Law Center information about Cliven Bundy, right wing extremist
csziggy
Apr 2014
#55
You bet it factors in. Bundy has been his own worst enemy. He's making it
snappyturtle
Apr 2014
#108
Oh, I wouldn't say that! I know Bundy has not paid up and has put himself in
snappyturtle
Apr 2014
#134
Why now? Because BLM was going to be sued to enforce previous court decisions
maddezmom
Apr 2014
#136
I'm sorry but this is almost laughable. The BLM has neglected its 'duty' UNTIL
snappyturtle
Apr 2014
#144
Okay. So I will go a bit further....the RW wants the land use issue to be a state issue not federal
maddezmom
Apr 2014
#147
I will read all your link but I have to take a break from reading...anterior uveitis...
snappyturtle
Apr 2014
#148
WTF is a "First Amendment Area" ???? Did BLM actually designate a 1st amendment area? Isn't
kelly1mm
Apr 2014
#77
The BLM doesn't want photos of their round-ups because a lot of animals are run to death.
Sunlei
Apr 2014
#88
Here is a link to the Federal Register. It consists of two pages regarding the
snappyturtle
Apr 2014
#118
Ok just so I understand this, BLM has closed a part of the public lands, and set aside
kelly1mm
Apr 2014
#143
Been in their family for generations - NO. Public land they have rented for a long time but then
jwirr
Apr 2014
#109
Yes, but if they succeed I have already said that I will not blame law enforcement. That land does
jwirr
Apr 2014
#114
I hear you. I am hoping that the BLM has cautioned the officers regarding the political implications
jwirr
Apr 2014
#122