Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Treason [View all]HughBeaumont
(24,461 posts)24. Well, hey, it's not like they didn't try before . . .
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Business_Plot
Learning their lessons that deliberate takeover doesn't work, the financiers then relied on working a glacial inside game of Washington . . . and then purchasing the media. Starting with these two jokers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_memo#Powell_Memorandum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich
And then instituting THIS asshole as Treasury Secretary and Chief of Staff to start the Wealth Tax Slash:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Regan
Oh, and did I mention THIS little bill, which relaxed thrift limits and allowed financial piracy to run rampant in the 1980s (When Reagan signed it, he infamously said "all in all, I think we hit the jackpot" ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garn_-_St_Germain_Depository_Institutions_Act
Of course, Don Regan's "ahem" . . . "Boss", didn't help matters much with this previous action:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PATCO_strike#August_1981_strike
Learning their lessons that deliberate takeover doesn't work, the financiers then relied on working a glacial inside game of Washington . . . and then purchasing the media. Starting with these two jokers:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Powell_memo#Powell_Memorandum
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Weyrich
And then instituting THIS asshole as Treasury Secretary and Chief of Staff to start the Wealth Tax Slash:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Regan
Oh, and did I mention THIS little bill, which relaxed thrift limits and allowed financial piracy to run rampant in the 1980s (When Reagan signed it, he infamously said "all in all, I think we hit the jackpot" ?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garn_-_St_Germain_Depository_Institutions_Act
Of course, Don Regan's "ahem" . . . "Boss", didn't help matters much with this previous action:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PATCO_strike#August_1981_strike
Michael Moore said that Reagan's firing of the PATCO strikers was the beginning of "America's downward slide", and the end of comfortable union jobs, with a middle-class salary, raises, and pensions. Moore stated that wages have remained stagnant for 30 years. He also blamed the AFL-CIO for telling their members to cross the PATCO picket lines.[12]
President Reagan's director of the United States Office of Personnel Management at the time, Donald J. Devine, argued:
"When the president said no...American business leaders were given a lesson in managerial leadership that they could not and did not ignore. Many private sector executives have told me that they were able to cut the fat from their organizations and adopt more competitive work practices because of what the government did in those days. I would not be surprised if these unseen effects of this private sector shakeout under the inspiration of the president were as profound in influencing the recovery that occurred as the formal economic and fiscal programs."
In a review of Joseph McCartin's book 2011, Collision Course: Ronald Reagan, The Air Traffic Controllers, and the Strike that Changed America in Review 31, Richard Sharpe claimed Reagan was "laying down a marker" for his presidency: "The strikers were often working class men and women who had achieved suburban middle class lives as air traffic controllers without having gone to college. Many were veterans of the US armed forces where they had learned their skills; their union had backed Reagan in his election campaign. Nevertheless, Reagan refused to back down. Several strikers were jailed; the union was fined and eventually made bankrupt. Only about 800 got their jobs back when Clinton lifted the ban on rehiring those who had struck. Many of the strikers were forced into poverty as a result of being blacklisted for employment."
President Reagan's director of the United States Office of Personnel Management at the time, Donald J. Devine, argued:
"When the president said no...American business leaders were given a lesson in managerial leadership that they could not and did not ignore. Many private sector executives have told me that they were able to cut the fat from their organizations and adopt more competitive work practices because of what the government did in those days. I would not be surprised if these unseen effects of this private sector shakeout under the inspiration of the president were as profound in influencing the recovery that occurred as the formal economic and fiscal programs."
In a review of Joseph McCartin's book 2011, Collision Course: Ronald Reagan, The Air Traffic Controllers, and the Strike that Changed America in Review 31, Richard Sharpe claimed Reagan was "laying down a marker" for his presidency: "The strikers were often working class men and women who had achieved suburban middle class lives as air traffic controllers without having gone to college. Many were veterans of the US armed forces where they had learned their skills; their union had backed Reagan in his election campaign. Nevertheless, Reagan refused to back down. Several strikers were jailed; the union was fined and eventually made bankrupt. Only about 800 got their jobs back when Clinton lifted the ban on rehiring those who had struck. Many of the strikers were forced into poverty as a result of being blacklisted for employment."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
73 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
The Constitution, not the dictionary, defines what is considered treason in the United States.
onenote
Mar 2014
#30
I don't know, destroying the govt is essentially war against the US, isnt't it:
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#22
"My goal is to cut government in half in twenty-five years, to get it down to the size where we can
grahamhgreen
Mar 2014
#66
Do you really believe that statement is anything other than bluster and hyperbole?
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#70
See my post # 35. The Republicans repeatedly oppose the basic tenets of our Constitution.
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#40
Oh please. I oppose the Second Amendment, so I guess I am also treasonous (nt)
Nye Bevan
Mar 2014
#44
If you oppose the Second Amendment, you need to try to amend the Constitution.
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#49
The truly sad part about it is that there are enough idiots out there to vote for it
world wide wally
Mar 2014
#16
K&R! One of those "certain big lies" is, "America has the best health care system in the world."
Enthusiast
Mar 2014
#21
What word or phrase would be more descriptive than treason? Yet the administration
indepat
Mar 2014
#25
Those are not government polices. Those are the principals set forth in the Constitution.
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#47
Most of the principles you mentioned are derived from amendments and/or court decisions
onenote
Mar 2014
#53
No. It isn't. But conducting a campaign that is wide in scope and opposes the basic
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#73
All laws must be based on the constitution, otherwise they're unconstitutional
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#54
I never suggested it wasn't permissable or unconstitutional or even undesirable
Nuclear Unicorn
Mar 2014
#63
Yet Supreme Court decisions have required people to enroll their children in school ot
JDPriestly
Mar 2014
#67
We need to stop using the term "terrorism" to describe "people we don't agree with."
Maedhros
Mar 2014
#32