Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Alex Sink said we should "dust off the Simpson-Bowles." No strong stand on Social Security. [View all]xchrom
(108,903 posts)4. a 2 time loser they want to foist on the voters again -- WTF are dems thinking? nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Alex Sink said we should "dust off the Simpson-Bowles." No strong stand on Social Security. [View all]
madfloridian
Mar 2014
OP
a 2 time loser they want to foist on the voters again -- WTF are dems thinking? nt
xchrom
Mar 2014
#4
How many times can this Blue Dog lose, & still be considered a "viable" candidate? Viable, for whom?
blkmusclmachine
Mar 2014
#7
What do you call a Democratic candidate who runs on the Third Way platform?
Jack Rabbit
Mar 2014
#19
She suggests that Social Security is one of the causes of an increasing deficit?
RVN VET
Mar 2014
#23
Gee. Running a weak Republican against a strong Republican in a Republican district...
Scootaloo
Mar 2014
#27
And the reason to be bipartisan is????? I see not one positive thing. nt
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#30
I think we could use more than 2 parties, but you're right about one thing -
Sarah Ibarruri
Mar 2014
#62