Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Torture Whistleblower: I got 30 months in prison. Why does Leon Panetta get a pass? [View all]struggle4progress
(118,235 posts)56. That stand will leave you entirely without any firm ground under your feet,
as it relegates all responsibility for oversight of Executive agencies to the Executive itself
Our system makes Congress one of the branches of the government and mostly leaves to politics the task of sorting out the inevitable power struggles, including questions of whether or not the Executive adequately informs Congress about operations
If Congress considers itself inadequately informed, or misinformed, or misled, it is the task of Congress to formulate appropriate response
And if you find Congressional inaction not to your taste, then it seems to me that it is for you to try to instigate and organize pressure on Congress to act
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
138 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Torture Whistleblower: I got 30 months in prison. Why does Leon Panetta get a pass? [View all]
cali
Mar 2014
OP
I'm having a hard time finding where Kirikou lied cited in that Wikipedia entry
dballance
Mar 2014
#4
Leon Panetta went from the CIA to the DoD, which conveniently gave his staff
TwilightGardener
Mar 2014
#2
If the Senate feels it would be appropriate, the Senate has options for action against Clapper
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#9
The Senate lies in a different branch of government from the Executive, and so
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#21
Do we possess (say) any official act of the Senate indicating that the Senate is outraged somehow?
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#28
The Senate's outrage is to be gauged by the actual outrage expressed by the Senate itself:
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#33
That stand will leave you entirely without any firm ground under your feet,
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#56
It's standard Washington baseball: something important is happening at third base,
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#88
You wouldn't know--neither would I--if he wrote a classified letter to the committee.
MADem
Mar 2014
#121
It seems to be your view, that a hundred Senators together with their staffs cannot parse Clapper,
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#115
This is another example of Washington baseball, and once again you've been distracted
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#129
Very well put. Wouldn't it be easier to face facts? I couldn't do the contortions it takes to try
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#125
Why? To satisfy Senators Rand Paul and Lindsey Graham? Or to satisfy Republican Representatives
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#127
How about because it's the right thing to do? Do you refrain from doing what is right just to stick
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#128
Translation: you consider yourself the final arbiter of what's right
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#132
Lying to Congress ISN"T wrong? No my idea regarding firing liars, and prosecuting war criminals who
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#133
Who in Congress says Clapper lied? In the Senate, I find Rand Paul; in the House, I find
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#134
There's no statute of limitations on lying to Congress that I know of. And Ron Wyden is
sabrina 1
Mar 2014
#136
Ron Wyden has never to my knowledge described Clapper's testimony as a lie
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#137
Nope. It is the responsibility of Congress to hold people accountable--or not--for contempt.
MADem
Mar 2014
#65
"Clapper should have said he can't answer in an unclassified forum, but he chose to lie."
ProSense
Mar 2014
#13
Eh...not really. Lying is not itself a crime, unless the elements of perjury are met. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#16
Kiriakou pled guilty to violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#8
Same reason PFC Manning rots in prison instead of war criminals Bush and Cheney.
Octafish
Mar 2014
#10
Is that really what you are asserting? Manning is the same as a torture defender? See #8 nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#14
You said the treatment of this torture defender is the same as Manning. So you are comparing the two
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#59
Um...John Kiriakou thought waterboarding was a good thing. I'm betting Chelsea Manning
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#17
You are the one who brought up Manning. Not me. Frankly, I'm puzzled why you
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#38
Yes, he was a proponent of waterboarding. If you didn't know that, that is on you, but you have the
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#62
YES!!! HE WAS TOTALLY OKAY WITH IT!!! He lied to the American people about the
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#94
The truth was going to come out. Kiriakou served to blunt the impact of the real revelations
CJCRANE
Mar 2014
#39
How gauche! All good Americans know that it is impolite to look and/or lean backward.
xocet
Mar 2014
#19
My momma always told me that my bad manners was why we couldn't have nice things.
bvar22
Mar 2014
#22
The original leaker was Richard Armitage, from the State department, and technically,
hughee99
Mar 2014
#120
That Armitage "confession" was just muddying the water as part of the cover-up
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#135
Waterboarding is never okay--this was the man who said it was--it was effective. nt
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#43
There are acts that protect whistleblowers. You seem rather upset and have resorted to personal
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#41
Indeed--in the other thread, it was quite clear who you were referencing with this post--
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#67
"Look, I get that you are upset with your mother" <--- is that wimpy personal insult all you got?
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#73
I don't personally insult DUers--particularly those who are exhibiting as much pain and distress as
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#89
My DU betters? Look, it's pretty obvious you are upset with me. And, that you
msanthrope
Mar 2014
#91
"you have conflated with problems with your mother" LMAO ...imagination is all you got.
L0oniX
Mar 2014
#93
And once again, you assert argumentum ad hominem as a valid practice. Noted again. nt
stevenleser
Mar 2014
#61
It amazes me that we have posters here that consistently disparage whistle-blowers
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#68
Kiriakou shilled for the neocons. He was a torture apologist. I know which side I'm on.
CJCRANE
Mar 2014
#70
I respect your dislike of Kiriakou but that should be beside the point. The point as I see it is
rhett o rick
Mar 2014
#71
i think this is because obama is in charge, if the same thing happened under bush
La Lioness Priyanka
Mar 2014
#72
Kiriakou was a propagandist for Bush. People are re-writing history to make a point.
CJCRANE
Mar 2014
#80
yes, the Feds get mad at employees who "whistle-blow" over their heads or by-pass official channels
Sunlei
Mar 2014
#97
He was pally with the corporate media. He did friendly interviews extolling the virtues of torture.
CJCRANE
Mar 2014
#110
I wasn't clear, I was talking about how the corporate media treated him after
Catherina
Mar 2014
#111
All the alleged "nuance" is there from the very beginning. Review the actual Brian Ross interviews
struggle4progress
Mar 2014
#130