Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,146 posts)
37. I don't care if the Senate is outraged or it isn't
Sat Mar 8, 2014, 04:42 PM
Mar 2014

plenty of wife batters are prosecuted over the strenuous objections of their wives every day.

Except Kiriakou lied about waterboarding. It was a limited hangout at best CJCRANE Mar 2014 #1
I'm having a hard time finding where Kirikou lied cited in that Wikipedia entry dballance Mar 2014 #4
His motivation was to defend the practice. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #5
Leon Panetta went from the CIA to the DoD, which conveniently gave his staff TwilightGardener Mar 2014 #2
This is ProSense Mar 2014 #3
Lying to Congress is a crime hootinholler Mar 2014 #6
Tell that to Darryl Issa CJCRANE Mar 2014 #7
If the Senate feels it would be appropriate, the Senate has options for action against Clapper struggle4progress Mar 2014 #9
So does Obama. n/t xocet Mar 2014 #12
Exactly. deurbano Mar 2014 #18
The Senate lies in a different branch of government from the Executive, and so struggle4progress Mar 2014 #21
that is absurd dsc Mar 2014 #25
Do we possess (say) any official act of the Senate indicating that the Senate is outraged somehow? struggle4progress Mar 2014 #28
This isn't some Talmudic matter of interpretation dsc Mar 2014 #31
The Senate's outrage is to be gauged by the actual outrage expressed by the Senate itself: struggle4progress Mar 2014 #33
I don't care if the Senate is outraged or it isn't dsc Mar 2014 #37
Don't feed the trolls pscot Mar 2014 #53
That stand will leave you entirely without any firm ground under your feet, struggle4progress Mar 2014 #56
I am not arguing the inverse dsc Mar 2014 #63
I wonder what your opinion of this is dsc Mar 2014 #82
It's standard Washington baseball: something important is happening at third base, struggle4progress Mar 2014 #88
Just how can oversight occur dsc Mar 2014 #92
How do you know that? MADem Mar 2014 #101
sure he didn't dsc Mar 2014 #114
You wouldn't know--neither would I--if he wrote a classified letter to the committee. MADem Mar 2014 #121
It seems to be your view, that a hundred Senators together with their staffs cannot parse Clapper, struggle4progress Mar 2014 #115
I love the "Every Little Sparrow" pile-ons when it comes to Obama.... MADem Mar 2014 #100
I would like a quote of me doing any of the above dsc Mar 2014 #117
This is another example of Washington baseball, and once again you've been distracted struggle4progress Mar 2014 #129
Presidents can't fire people? sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #122
When the subject under discsussion is some questionable act Marr Mar 2014 #123
Very well put. Wouldn't it be easier to face facts? I couldn't do the contortions it takes to try sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #125
Why? To satisfy Senators Rand Paul and Lindsey Graham? Or to satisfy Republican Representatives struggle4progress Mar 2014 #127
How about because it's the right thing to do? Do you refrain from doing what is right just to stick sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #128
Translation: you consider yourself the final arbiter of what's right struggle4progress Mar 2014 #132
Lying to Congress ISN"T wrong? No my idea regarding firing liars, and prosecuting war criminals who sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #133
Who in Congress says Clapper lied? In the Senate, I find Rand Paul; in the House, I find struggle4progress Mar 2014 #134
There's no statute of limitations on lying to Congress that I know of. And Ron Wyden is sabrina 1 Mar 2014 #136
Ron Wyden has never to my knowledge described Clapper's testimony as a lie struggle4progress Mar 2014 #137
Nope. It is the responsibility of Congress to hold people accountable--or not--for contempt. MADem Mar 2014 #65
So when Nixon's henchmen lied to Congress dsc Mar 2014 #81
It is the responsibility of Congress to impose consequences for that. MADem Mar 2014 #84
One of the reasons they forced him to dsc Mar 2014 #85
Well, if that is what you want to believe, you go right ahead. MADem Mar 2014 #86
the whole point of Watergate was the misdeeds of his staff at his behest dsc Mar 2014 #118
Here are the actual articles of impeachment struggle4progress Mar 2014 #131
"Clapper should have said he can't answer in an unclassified forum, but he chose to lie." ProSense Mar 2014 #13
No it wouldn't have been a lie dsc Mar 2014 #26
Eh...not really. Lying is not itself a crime, unless the elements of perjury are met. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #16
Kiriakou pled guilty to violating the Intelligence Identities Protection Act struggle4progress Mar 2014 #8
Same reason PFC Manning rots in prison instead of war criminals Bush and Cheney. Octafish Mar 2014 #10
Is that really what you are asserting? Manning is the same as a torture defender? See #8 nt stevenleser Mar 2014 #14
No. I'm asserting a government that lets Bush and Cheney go is corrupt. Octafish Mar 2014 #36
Indeed! There is no law for them and plenty of law for the 99%. Justice? pffft L0oniX Mar 2014 #57
You said the treatment of this torture defender is the same as Manning. So you are comparing the two stevenleser Mar 2014 #59
comey is a torture defender questionseverything Mar 2014 #77
Wow, you must have had a hard time spinning that one! Rex Mar 2014 #44
Obviously not since several other folks got the same impression stevenleser Mar 2014 #58
Um...John Kiriakou thought waterboarding was a good thing. I'm betting Chelsea Manning msanthrope Mar 2014 #17
Really nice smear, msanthrope. Octafish Mar 2014 #34
You are the one who brought up Manning. Not me. Frankly, I'm puzzled why you msanthrope Mar 2014 #38
Kiriakou exposed the waterboarding. Octafish Mar 2014 #48
Yes, he was a proponent of waterboarding. If you didn't know that, that is on you, but you have the stevenleser Mar 2014 #62
YES!!! HE WAS TOTALLY OKAY WITH IT!!! He lied to the American people about the msanthrope Mar 2014 #94
The truth was going to come out. Kiriakou served to blunt the impact of the real revelations CJCRANE Mar 2014 #39
They never give up do they? Rex Mar 2014 #40
There is a difference between "whistleblowing" and a "limited hangout". CJCRANE Mar 2014 #46
This message was self-deleted by its author CJCRANE Mar 2014 #49
''Everyone is corrupt, I’ve come to learn,'' John Kiriakou said. Octafish Mar 2014 #74
Who got "charged" or "investigated" for outing Agent Valerie Plame? bvar22 Mar 2014 #11
How gauche! All good Americans know that it is impolite to look and/or lean backward. xocet Mar 2014 #19
My momma always told me that my bad manners was why we couldn't have nice things. bvar22 Mar 2014 #22
Thanks for the Seinfeld video clip. xocet Mar 2014 #24
I love puns, but sadly, bvar22 Mar 2014 #29
YEP. Rex Mar 2014 #42
Brewster Jennings & Assoc. FOUGHT NUCLEAR WEAPONS THEFT. Octafish Mar 2014 #47
Hmmm I think it was Scooter Libby ...who was almost immediatly pardoned by... L0oniX Mar 2014 #60
The original leaker was Richard Armitage, from the State department, and technically, hughee99 Mar 2014 #120
That Armitage "confession" was just muddying the water as part of the cover-up struggle4progress Mar 2014 #135
And, the perpetrators of the actual waterboarding got a pass. Tierra_y_Libertad Mar 2014 #15
what he said. librechik Mar 2014 #20
It's OK when our team does it because GO TEAM! nt JJChambers Mar 2014 #23
Waterboarding is never okay--this was the man who said it was--it was effective. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #43
Oh stop it will ya? There are Acts that protect whistleblowers. L0oniX Mar 2014 #27
I think Kiriakou was a neocon shill rather than a whistleblower. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #30
Yes, he was claiming that waterboarding works. n/t ProSense Mar 2014 #32
Exactly. He claimed that they only waterboarded Abu Zubaydah for 30 seconds CJCRANE Mar 2014 #35
There are acts that protect whistleblowers. You seem rather upset and have resorted to personal msanthrope Mar 2014 #41
"personal attacks" Really? Ok ...now it's all about you? Whatever. L0oniX Mar 2014 #54
Indeed--in the other thread, it was quite clear who you were referencing with this post-- msanthrope Mar 2014 #67
"Look, I get that you are upset with your mother" <--- is that wimpy personal insult all you got? L0oniX Mar 2014 #73
I don't personally insult DUers--particularly those who are exhibiting as much pain and distress as msanthrope Mar 2014 #89
"I'm merely asking you to work out your family issues" LMAO L0oniX Mar 2014 #90
My DU betters? Look, it's pretty obvious you are upset with me. And, that you msanthrope Mar 2014 #91
"you have conflated with problems with your mother" LMAO ...imagination is all you got. L0oniX Mar 2014 #93
Why not put me on ignore, since I stress you out so much? nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #95
Oh boy ...seen this before ...the ol begging to be put on ignore blather. L0oniX Mar 2014 #96
Oh..I'm not begging you to, merely suggesting it for your sake. nt msanthrope Mar 2014 #98
"for your sake" Your concern is touching. L0oniX Mar 2014 #99
K&R for pissing off all the RIGHT people! Rex Mar 2014 #45
There are two issues here: CJCRANE Mar 2014 #50
And once again, you assert argumentum ad hominem as a valid practice. Noted again. nt stevenleser Mar 2014 #61
Says all we need to know truebluegreen Mar 2014 #51
so you really meant to put "white" and "house" underthematrix Mar 2014 #52
? I was quoting. truebluegreen Mar 2014 #55
K & R !!! WillyT Mar 2014 #64
thats because we have a criminal justice system rafeh1 Mar 2014 #66
Good one. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #69
It amazes me that we have posters here that consistently disparage whistle-blowers rhett o rick Mar 2014 #68
Kiriakou shilled for the neocons. He was a torture apologist. I know which side I'm on. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #70
I respect your dislike of Kiriakou but that should be beside the point. The point as I see it is rhett o rick Mar 2014 #71
Yes, he was treated badly but he was a propagandist not a whistleblower. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #79
NOT a Propagandist for BUSH! KoKo Mar 2014 #103
How ’07 ABC Interview Tilted a Torture Debate struggle4progress Mar 2014 #109
Working with Senator Kerry was "Shilling for Neocons?" KoKo Mar 2014 #104
In his initial TV interview he sold the effectiveness of waterboarding. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #106
i think this is because obama is in charge, if the same thing happened under bush La Lioness Priyanka Mar 2014 #72
How true. n/t xocet Mar 2014 #75
I agree, but how sad. nm rhett o rick Mar 2014 #76
Kiriakou was a propagandist for Bush. People are re-writing history to make a point. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #80
Kiriakou was No Propagandist for Bush..Here's the Scoop on him--LINK: KoKo Mar 2014 #102
Thanks for the link. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #105
He changed ProSense Mar 2014 #107
Reporter Says He First Learned of C.I.A. Operative From Rove ProSense Mar 2014 #87
It doesn't amaze me at all. sibelian Mar 2014 #78
Imprisoning the truth tellers and protecting the criminals. woo me with science Mar 2014 #83
yes, the Feds get mad at employees who "whistle-blow" over their heads or by-pass official channels Sunlei Mar 2014 #97
Oh Cali, Cali Woman! Why you be rocking de boat? Catherina Mar 2014 #108
He was pally with the corporate media. He did friendly interviews extolling the virtues of torture. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #110
I wasn't clear, I was talking about how the corporate media treated him after Catherina Mar 2014 #111
Thanks for the link. His story is more nuanced than I realized. CJCRANE Mar 2014 #113
If only we had an honest media. Thanks CJCRANE n/t Catherina Mar 2014 #116
All the alleged "nuance" is there from the very beginning. Review the actual Brian Ross interviews struggle4progress Mar 2014 #130
*Still* being slimed. woo me with science Mar 2014 #112
K&R woo me with science Mar 2014 #119
k & r! n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #124
Hypocrisy and the results of cognitive dissonance are the norm ...nt MindMover Mar 2014 #126
kick woo me with science Mar 2014 #138
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Torture Whistleblower: ...»Reply #37