Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
I really like the last paragraph you wrote and Autumn Mar 2014 #1
Thought that was interesting also. KoKo Mar 2014 #6
These politicians are constantly campaigning. That's their main job and goal. Autumn Mar 2014 #8
That's why term limits are a bad idea loyalsister Mar 2014 #42
So WHO do you suggest could be more likely to win than Hillary? Auntie Bush Mar 2014 #2
Go back in time, after Bush's 1st term and ask the same question TalkingDog Mar 2014 #5
Sure you do. A lot of folks were talking about him as a Presidential candidate as of late 2004. stevenleser Mar 2014 #36
and enough are talking about Warren now. n/t Whisp Mar 2014 #38
Nope. This is nearly two years later in relative terms. stevenleser Mar 2014 #51
As far as I am aware no one has announced they are running for president in 2016. However, talking lostincalifornia Mar 2014 #3
they would still be for sale... magical thyme Mar 2014 #4
hindsight means nothing to the blind reddread Mar 2014 #7
We are done already...we're just debating the speed at which we hit the brick wall... Moostache Mar 2014 #9
+1,000,000! RufusTFirefly Mar 2014 #10
not necessarily reddread Mar 2014 #11
Anyone who does that gets thrown under the capacious DU bus n/t RufusTFirefly Mar 2014 #12
only by a few, no matter how persistent they are, they are only a few reddread Mar 2014 #13
eeesh, I sure wouldn't make driving drunk sound like an adventurish fun time... Whisp Mar 2014 #40
ill leave those worries to the deceivers and hypocrites reddread Mar 2014 #43
drunk drivers are a menace, sorry if that hurts your feelings. n/t Whisp Mar 2014 #44
not at all, but thanks for considering them reddread Mar 2014 #46
you really want to go there, don't you? Whisp Mar 2014 #49
I do reddread Mar 2014 #50
Your analogy is perfect tea and oranges Mar 2014 #14
AND the supreme court! We need to impeach some of those bastards NOW! loudsue Mar 2014 #15
I vote for neither bigwillq Mar 2014 #16
A "Nother Neither" here. NRaleighLiberal Mar 2014 #17
wouldnt they both be on their first term? RedstDem Mar 2014 #18
Clarence Thomas n/t reddread Mar 2014 #19
please dont say that name RedstDem Mar 2014 #20
as Biden does me reddread Mar 2014 #21
biden makes you wanna puke? RedstDem Mar 2014 #37
I teke that sort of treachery more seriously than honest morons. reddread Mar 2014 #39
thomas cant even bring himself to speak while in court RedstDem Mar 2014 #41
he could not get arrested. reddread Mar 2014 #47
There's the Outta Touch Problem tea and oranges Mar 2014 #22
Neither for me. LuvNewcastle Mar 2014 #23
I liked your headline and last paragraph. woo me with science Mar 2014 #24
I agree with Term Limits.. blue14u Mar 2014 #25
Technology does not trump the humanities swilton Mar 2014 #26
Who said that anyone is owed the presidency? Beacool Mar 2014 #27
Neither.. n/t Smarmie Doofus Mar 2014 #28
We have term limits in California. The politicians spend a lot of time looking for their next job. JDPriestly Mar 2014 #29
no kidding, they dont fuck around reddread Mar 2014 #30
"In this time we live in, gender (female) trumps sitting-veep." YoungDemCA Mar 2014 #31
The media is obsessed with the "first female president" meme SoCalDem Mar 2014 #34
Rec'd for the intelligent point about age BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #32
Warren-Grayson, or Grayson-Warren. Aristus Mar 2014 #33
Neither. Octafish Mar 2014 #35
I didn't know Steve Kimock was considering running. Warren DeMontague Mar 2014 #45
neither! n/t wildbilln864 Mar 2014 #48
THANK YOU SoCalDem! so well stated! rustydog Mar 2014 #52
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Biden? Clinton?.. How abo...»Reply #46