DDDD – Deny, Disrupt, Degrade, Deceive (Reply #27)

In the discussion thread: How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations [View all]

Response to DesMoinesDem (Original post)

Tue Feb 25, 2014, 10:26 AM

Octafish (55,745 posts)

27. DDDD – Deny, Disrupt, Degrade, Deceive

Dude.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

310 replies	Author	Time	Post
How Covert Agents Infiltrate the Internet to Manipulate, Deceive, and Destroy Reputations [View all]	DesMoinesDem	Feb 2014	OP
k&r thanks for posting. nm	rhett o rick	Feb 2014	#1
That of course could never ever happen here.	nadinbrzezinski	Feb 2014	#2
nope	bobduca	Feb 2014	#19
Well there was this from Salon	Autumn	Feb 2014	#30
This really has me thinking...are there covert agents here?	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#58
non-citizens may have some advantage here	reddread	Feb 2014	#64
I doubt one could ever know. If a republican were in office it	Autumn	Feb 2014	#66
I'd look for someone who is extremely well organized in his/her posts and never says	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#166
Holy fucking shit!!11!	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#171
Glad you can appreciate.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#172
That is 100% creepy right there.	arcane1	Feb 2014	#75
They're here!	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#79
I wonder if the Administration pays the same if	Jackpine Radical	Feb 2014	#104
They pay handsomely	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#105
Pay is based on the number of smilies used [n/t]	Maedhros	Feb 2014	#278
Psst...Glenn's book is out on Mar. 25th. Now he has a reason for all the mean Amazon reviews. nt	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#225
Here are a couple of very interesting paras from that Salon story:	Jackpine Radical	Feb 2014	#103
very interesting	reddread	Feb 2014	#106
Indeed. (nt)	Jackpine Radical	Feb 2014	#116
Sunstein's the guy who recc'd we forgive Bush war crimes.	Octafish	Mar 2014	#292
It's about time this piece of the horror story begins to get some exposure.	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#3
+1, well said.	Marr	Feb 2014	#16
Nice!	Enthusiast	Feb 2014	#21
But we must be grateful, at least, that we have a Dem	rusty fender	Feb 2014	#42
Woo, you said the same thiong as Greenwald, but...	bvar22	Feb 2014	#92
No, thank you.	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#198
This is just what I see here when certain subjects come up	Mojorabbit	Feb 2014	#229
this response is wrong.	frwrfpos	Feb 2014	#107
If you haven't read Greg Palast's Vulture's Picnic, you should.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#170
True. Combine surveillance, record-keeping on every individual's whereabouts and activities	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#169
We don't have concentration camps	Aerows	Feb 2014	#250
You make a good point.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#254
Maybe they'll just start treating us like email--	Jackpine Radical	Feb 2014	#281
K&R'd!	snot	Feb 2014	#4
They really are not that hard to spot. And of course, Anonymous confirmed that Glenn Greenwald	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#5
"This SHOULD be illegal, but of course we have to be an actual Democracy..."	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#9
Things are moving fast. The privatization of everything is nearly complete.	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#13
funny how you have zero criticism of the Ukrainian despot who ordered snipers to murder	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#35
You mean the protesters that are largely made up of neo-nazis and fascists?	qwertyq	Feb 2014	#55
if an army sniper suspects someone is a fascist, then it's okay to shoot them in the city street?	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#56
No, of course not.	Jackpine Radical	Feb 2014	#282
inside the US, absolutely not nt	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#283
True, we moslty just let the cops eliminate potential problems with their sidearms.	Jackpine Radical	Feb 2014	#284
a symptom , not the disease ...	MindMover	Feb 2014	#57
Funny you ignored everything and stuck to the talking point that is supposed to justify	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#87
your crocodile tears for a despot who ordered the murder of political protestors	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#88
Your support for coup d'etats in democracies, is also noted. Btw, that 'duly noted' thing,	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#153
How many dead protestors in the US vs Ukraine?	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#160
You aren't very fond of the 'left' are you?	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#162
Not an attack on the left, just those who embrace authoritarianism	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#163
Like I said, not very fond of the Left, and you provide more of the same old 'commie'	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#167
Sabrina	Aerows	Feb 2014	#255
When our nation's leaders murder, it doesn't seem so bad.	Vattel	Feb 2014	#118
Have you read Vultures' Picnic by Greg Palast. It lays out some of the interesting details	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#173
I was going to quote the same. It's certainly quote worthy.	Enthusiast	Feb 2014	#22
+1	jsr	Feb 2014	#33
+1 a whole bunch!	Enthusiast	Feb 2014	#23
then name names. if you have identified government agents posting at DU	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#34
If the poster were to name name's.....	go west young man	Feb 2014	#54
if they named my name, I'd have a good chuckle at their stupidity nt	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#62
Then don't invite naming names.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#174
As much as it bothers me to say it	Aerows	Feb 2014	#259
I've seen it.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#261
Not the first time, Skinner admitted to this during the transition from DU2 to DU3	mrdmk	Feb 2014	#287
Go straight to the admins ... tell them who's on your "list".	JoePhilly	Feb 2014	#109
"Call outs" used to be against the rules on DU	BuelahWitch	Feb 2014	#61
so observing DU rules is secondary to resisting efforts by the security state to spy on us? nt	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#63
This website is privately owned	BuelahWitch	Feb 2014	#65
So you'd rather "stay here" than fight the security state deploying govt agents to post on DU?	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#76
They don't need government agents on the internet. All they need are willing participants	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#67
Greenwald's personality is really besides the point.	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#69
Of course, that is the reason why we need journalists like Greenwald and	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#72
some are agents, some are that agents "personas"	questionseverything	Feb 2014	#94
The thing about RWers is that they are never conscious enough to realize how transparent	Zorra	Feb 2014	#41
+1 & LOL.	Egalitarian Thug	Feb 2014	#46
So you maintain a "list", right?	JoePhilly	Feb 2014	#110
Who needs any list? I go by the talking points, not the messengers.	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#134
Upton Sinclair 1935	bobduca	Feb 2014	#145
Lol, I like that quote ...	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#147
B,but he's a NARCISSIST!!!!!! nt	Bonobo	Feb 2014	#119
And they also train people to do it for them	zeemike	Feb 2014	#6
Busted, but no repercussions; like O'keefe and the Acorn fiasco...	dougolat	Feb 2014	#11
Oh, yeah. It was highly effective.	Enthusiast	Feb 2014	#25
Effective.... only because the Democratic Party Leadership...	bvar22	Feb 2014	#95
Exactly.	Enthusiast	Feb 2014	#96
Astute post. Really interesting. Thanks.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#175
Well there are a few obvious ones	Tumbulu	Feb 2014	#7
freedom of the press is a benefit conferred to those who own a press	bobduca	Feb 2014	#20
That's what is setting off the NSA's efforts to do surveillance and propagandize.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#176
If it's so obvious, then you should have no trouble outing these government agents nt	geek tragedy	Feb 2014	#37
only a matter of time	reddread	Feb 2014	#38
It is really not a good idea	Aerows	Feb 2014	#260
well, well, well. nt	grasswire	Feb 2014	#8
thank you again, Edward Snowden. nt	grasswire	Feb 2014	#10
keep this pinned to the top of page 1	reddread	Feb 2014	#12
It is coming out, but watch out for the 'explainers' who should be along anytime now.	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#14
We see the results of their work here every day, and it's quite obvious.	Marr	Feb 2014	#15
put the swooners on Ignore	Skittles	Feb 2014	#18
better read the comments section. nt	grasswire	Feb 2014	#17
+1000000000	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#26
Yes...interesting read and some nice refresher links from commenters...	KoKo	Feb 2014	#60
K&R. Of Course we would "never" have them here...	Katashi_itto	Feb 2014	#24
Yeah, totally ridiculous	Puzzledtraveller	Feb 2014	#28
DDDD – Deny, Disrupt, Degrade, Deceive	Octafish	Feb 2014	#27
someone on the comments section..	grasswire	Feb 2014	#100
No one's going to get the "Dude" anymore.	JackRiddler	Feb 2014	#102
Expert professional opinions always have the best facts to guide us	jsr	Feb 2014	#29
K&R	Coyotl	Feb 2014	#31
The more you go through it, the uglier it is. nt	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#32
K&R	deutsey	Feb 2014	#36
But,but,but....Greenwald and Snowden are jerks, therefoe this doesn't matter	Armstead	Feb 2014	#39
So you think groups like Anonymous should be free to attack the Internet whenever they wish.	randome	Feb 2014	#40
Who is a legitmate target of such tactics?	rusty fender	Feb 2014	#43
That is an excellent question. About time someone asked it.	randome	Feb 2014	#44
No, nor do I think the giovernment should be able to either	Armstead	Feb 2014	#49
according to the original leaks	questionseverything	Feb 2014	#93
up up and away	reddread	Feb 2014	#45
Kick. /nt	Marr	Feb 2014	#47
Not quite seeing where the "illegal" part is in all of this...	Blue_Tires	Feb 2014	#48
Isn't that bad enough?	Armstead	Feb 2014	#50
So are we ato assume that the gov't the the big bad dog in this	Sheepshank	Feb 2014	#53
typical false equivalence	bobduca	Feb 2014	#150
of course I'm stating the possibility exists....did you not read it properly?	Sheepshank	Feb 2014	#194
Koch, Fox and Beck maybe. But Greenwald? You way overestimate or underestimate him.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#178
THERE IS ALWAYS people out there willing to volunteer for their precious cause	Sheepshank	Feb 2014	#197
Yes Greenwald has hired HBGary to infiltrate forums and post on his behalf	bobduca	Feb 2014	#201
Depending on how it is done and for what purpose, it could be fraud, defamation (in the case	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#177
Gee, I wonder why they were keeping that secret? Thank you, Edward Snowden.	Tierra_y_Libertad	Feb 2014	#51
k&r for exposure. n/t	Laelth	Feb 2014	#52
HUGE K & R !!!	WillyT	Feb 2014	#59
Project much, Glennie Glenn? We know that your "disciples" dominate the web.	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#68
Too funny. Discredit everyone who criticizes Greenwald.	ProSense	Feb 2014	#71
Are you saying these documents are fake, and the government isn't actually doing this? /nt	Marr	Feb 2014	#78
No,	ProSense	Feb 2014	#80
To borrow a phrase...	Marr	Feb 2014	#81
LOL!	ProSense	Feb 2014	#83
Do you think that any of the people posting on DU get paid to do it?	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#190
Indeed. I am saying that the U.S. government (including the NSA) isn't actually doing this.	ConservativeDemocrat	Feb 2014	#140
So... Greenwald just made those documents up?	Marr	Feb 2014	#143
You actualy will acknowledge a fact?	ConservativeDemocrat	Feb 2014	#154
Look, if this kind of diversionary dissembling is all you're going to offer...	Marr	Feb 2014	#158
The problem with taking any side for or against Anonymous is that the moniker	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#179
And this is a quite excellent post that truly explains Greenwald. This is merely a ramp up to the	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#209
I keep wondering when the world will figure out that GG is Alex Jones with a better hair stylist.	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#86
smear by association :fail	bobduca	Feb 2014	#149
Right back atcha, big boy.	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#196
I made no such attempt to associate Greenwald with a screaming picture of Alex Jones. You did that.	bobduca	Feb 2014	#202
Fuck Glenn Greenwald & Alex Jones, brothers from another Mother.	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#230
repeat the lie, repeat the lie, repeat the lie!	bobduca	Feb 2014	#231
Ooohhh. Looks like a touched a nerve with one or both of your heroes?	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#236
Here's a clue.	bobduca	Feb 2014	#240
!!!	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#249
Lol, right on cue. Am I psychic or what? I love it when I make predictions and they arrive, right	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#244
Quick! Tell us how many US households watch the Kremlin sponsored Russia Today?	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#246
So what do you think of the US Government spying on every single American?	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#251
I thought not! Don't ever change sabrina. You are nothing, if not 100% consistent.	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#257
I haven't changed. Remember when Dems were OUTRAGED over Bush spying on the American people??	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#262
Until you can back this up, I'll refrain from taking your interrogation seriously.	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#263
Spying on the American People is a crime. Which is why Dems were so outraged	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#264
And "consistently" wrong!	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#265
Then you agree NOW with the Government spying on the American people.	sabrina 1	Feb 2014	#266
If I say okay, YOU WIN, will that make you go away?	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#267
They are alllll up in this thread, aren't they? As usual	Number23	Feb 2014	#268
You can't make this shit up!	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#270
It's unfortunate that people such as myself who know very little about these topics	LanternWaste	Feb 2014	#276
Rationalize to who? You? My, my someone's feeling mighty self important today. Talk about "Waste".	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#277
Careful, you're going to end up on some one's "list" of	JoePhilly	Feb 2014	#111
or put on ignore	reddread	Feb 2014	#112
When they ignore you ... you win.	JoePhilly	Feb 2014	#127
I don't have anyone on ignore. I am here to exchange information, ideas and points of view,	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#180
The fact that the same paranoid clueless crowd lap up these types of threads is proof they wouldn't	Number23	Feb 2014	#121
Are you saying you think the documents Greenwald cited are fakes?	Marr	Feb 2014	#122
I will say the same thing to you that I say every single time you respond to me despite REPEATED	Number23	Feb 2014	#123
In other words, you haven't got an answer.	Marr	Feb 2014	#125
You have been asked REPEATEDLY to leave me alone. You refuse for reasons only you understand	Number23	Feb 2014	#126
I will respond to anyone I choose.	Marr	Feb 2014	#128
You could ask me what the time was and my answer would still be the same	Number23	Feb 2014	#136
Again, thank you for your non-answer on the subject of the authenticity of Greenwald's	Marr	Feb 2014	#137
Spin it as desperately and stupidly as you'd like	Number23	Feb 2014	#138
Here's a thought-- don't respond.	Marr	Feb 2014	#142
Yet ANOTHER request to you to Leave Me Alone. Yet ANOTHER jury verdict that did not go your way	Number23	Feb 2014	#155
Are you accusing me of alerting on you?	Marr	Feb 2014	#156
I am not trying to get you banned. I don't give a damn about anything that you say	Number23	Feb 2014	#157
Actually, at this point I'm just wondering if you're constitutionally capable	Marr	Feb 2014	#159
The only thing "disingenuous" is you trying to pretend that you have anything intelligent to say	Number23	Feb 2014	#161
More paranoid accusations.	Marr	Feb 2014	#164
So "boring" that you WILL NOT leave me the hell alone	Number23	Feb 2014	#269
Wow. Not rude and insulting in the least.	cui bono	Mar 2014	#294
Wow. Not needless, a week late and remarkably pitiful in the least either.	Number23	Mar 2014	#295
Just pointing out your hypocrisy.	cui bono	Mar 2014	#296
Your own hypocricy (not to mention obvious boredom) should be more than enough to keep you	Number23	Mar 2014	#297
Your post #15 is pretty clear.	JoePhilly	Feb 2014	#129
Did I say that?	Marr	Feb 2014	#131
See, that's how I see some of the disgruntled left OPs here.	JoePhilly	Feb 2014	#132
It's a reasonable thing to wonder.	Marr	Feb 2014	#133
The other one is not just idle speculation. The article on another link above	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#182
This is the Democratic Underground. It is for opinions of different kinds. We can't learn	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#181
They are so fuckin' pathetic, I can't help but scoff at 'em. They don't even know they're being....	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#195
Exactly, Tarheel	Bobbie Jo	Feb 2014	#223
I have my own definition, but the "Paulites" are here, and they boast about "stoking it up".	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#232
+1. The irony is a bit much, IMO. nt	ecstatic	Feb 2014	#215
He needs a reason for the negative reviews---his book is out on the 25th of March. nt	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#226
Ask Sibel Edmonds about his loony ass followers. They are the "lunatic fringe". n/t	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#238
Sibel got the best of Greenwald. So did Sarah Harrison.	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#242
Kudos to Sibel Edmonds. She is persistent, and she's not letting up. "Checkbook Journalism"....	Tarheel_Dem	Feb 2014	#245
Omidyar is going to co-opt Greenwald. Bet on it. nt	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#271
This post deserves Greatest post status...	go west young man	Feb 2014	#70
it is THE story of THIS DECADE	reddread	Feb 2014	#85
Deserves Greatest Page...and lots of daylight...	bvar22	Feb 2014	#101
+10000000	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#205
So far as reputation, I do not respect big money.	hunter	Feb 2014	#73
I love your story about your mom! Good for her. She spoke what she felt was right.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#183
again, I urge reading the comments section after that article.	grasswire	Feb 2014	#74
I Did... it Was a Real Eye-Opener!	fascisthunter	Feb 2014	#90
Greenwald. LOL...nt	SidDithers	Feb 2014	#77
SidDithers. LOL... nt	hootinholler	Feb 2014	#98
Love it!	Puglover	Feb 2014	#286
Keep quacking....	grasswire	Feb 2014	#99
Der Spiegel covering this story.	go west young man	Feb 2014	#82
After reading the complete article, it occurs to me that all	MineralMan	Feb 2014	#84
I think that's the point. Not all are so well read as You and I and others who	KoKo	Feb 2014	#135
It is incompatible with democracy to have the government doing it.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#184
Well, Well, Well... most kinda Knew Something Was Up!	fascisthunter	Feb 2014	#89
woo me with science.... said the same thing, but so much better:	bvar22	Feb 2014	#91
It is surprising to me,	sadoldgirl	Feb 2014	#97
Yes. As it became evident that the OWS might be shut down perhaps with police brutality,	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#185
recommend	frwrfpos	Feb 2014	#108
this explains the outbreak of snowden lynchings.	Warren Stupidity	Feb 2014	#113
But we don't have any of those here.	pa28	Feb 2014	#114
How would one identify a paid poster?	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#120
That would be difficult.	pa28	Feb 2014	#124
Eventually, other DUers would catch on to them.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#187
"Eventually, other DUers would catch on to them"	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#216
You seem upset about the wrong thing	LondonReign2	Feb 2014	#239
I seem upset?	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#243
There's this	LondonReign2	Feb 2014	#247
I wasn't upset at all	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#252
Goes back to my original point	LondonReign2	Feb 2014	#253
Very telling...	Cali_Democrat	Feb 2014	#256
We agree	LondonReign2	Feb 2014	#258
An individual violating the law is an unconscionable travesty.	Maedhros	Feb 2014	#279
I agree.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#186
What a shock! Who knew?	Zorra	Feb 2014	#115
Fuck our government	Vattel	Feb 2014	#117
Fuck poor readers...	ConservativeDemocrat	Feb 2014	#141
Rec,d, those propagandists are right here in this thread too	Corruption Inc	Feb 2014	#130
Exactly. The ones I suspect of being paid posters don't respond to questions about why	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#188
In DC it's called "bipartisanship."	blkmusclmachine	Feb 2014	#139
K&R	DeSwiss	Feb 2014	#144
K&RRRR	Little_Wing	Feb 2014	#146
They're not that covert to me. They're not hard to spot if they're talking, like here on DU. nt	ChisolmTrailDem	Feb 2014	#148
Blue links n/t	Pastiche423	Feb 2014	#151
Woops! No names please.	JDPriestly	Feb 2014	#189
"YOU MAKE NO SENSE".	sibelian	Feb 2014	#191
I think a significant chunk of my IGNORE list has just been explained.....	mike_c	Feb 2014	#152
K&R	bobduca	Feb 2014	#165
Why does this surprise anyone?	davekriss	Feb 2014	#168
it doesnt	reddread	Feb 2014	#193
They are certainly flailing.	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#208
6. Accusing Greenwald of hiring astroturfers / HBGary to "character asassinate" his critics.	bobduca	Feb 2014	#234
Bwah!	woo me with science	Mar 2014	#310
Pretty limited repertoire. What a crappy singing school.	jsr	Feb 2014	#241
K&R	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#192
At least he is finally admitting whi he is!	whistler162	Feb 2014	#199
I'm not following you.	Maedhros	Feb 2014	#280
This same thing is posted on DU every 8-12 months. nt	stevenleser	Feb 2014	#200
link	reddread	Feb 2014	#203
Here's proof. And you understand the difference between predicting and disproving something, right?	stevenleser	Feb 2014	#204
so is it ct or is it old news?	questionseverything	Feb 2014	#206
Both. As I proved, the suggestion keeps getting posted here, and the idea is ridiculous.	stevenleser	Feb 2014	#210
what provocateurs?	reddread	Feb 2014	#224
please be exact	questionseverything	Feb 2014	#227
staking it all right through the heart of the matter	reddread	Feb 2014	#211
Yep, like anti-vax it's old AND it's ct.	stevenleser	Feb 2014	#221
predictable	reddread	Feb 2014	#207
It's either been posted before or it hasn't. It's predictability is irrelevant. nt	stevenleser	Feb 2014	#219
Wait a minute. So before there was documentary evidence, it was paranoia, and now that there IS	Marr	Feb 2014	#272
perceptive n/t	reddread	Feb 2014	#273
Gotta love the dismissal of the evidence in the defense of	neverforget	Feb 2014	#285
There are all kinds	TBF	Feb 2014	#214
When something is asserted to be new or special or unique? Yes. nt	stevenleser	Feb 2014	#220
Where is the commentary making those assertions?	TBF	Feb 2014	#228
Right there. In Steve's comments.	Romulox	Feb 2014	#233
Proving what, exactly?	Romulox	Feb 2014	#217
Damage control. nt	Zorra	Feb 2014	#248
Pssst.....Glenn's book is out March 25th. He's trying to innoculate himself from criticism. nt	msanthrope	Feb 2014	#212
Sort of like the attempts to destroy Pres. Obama's reputation?	ecstatic	Feb 2014	#213
Shhhh, only posts in favor of Obama can be bad. Didn't you get the memo?	stevenleser	Feb 2014	#222
Never! True, our gov't secretly kills US citizens with drones. But disrupt the internet? Never! nt	Romulox	Feb 2014	#218
there is a big difference between stopping lies, vs. spreading false information	JPZenger	Feb 2014	#235
WMD's n/t	reddread	Feb 2014	#237
kick	woo me with science	Feb 2014	#274
another........!	KoKo	Feb 2014	#275
Important.	woo me with science	Mar 2014	#288
I have here in my hand a LIST! nt	Bobbie Jo	Mar 2014	#289
Kick for a reminder of the propaganda in our midst.	woo me with science	Mar 2014	#290
warmongering, overthrowing, assassinating machinery	reddread	Mar 2014	#291
Thank you.	woo me with science	Mar 2014	#293
This slide from the GG piece is exemplified by the tactics/behavior of the likely parties.	hedda_foil	Mar 2014	#298
kick	woo me with science	Mar 2014	#299
up up and away	reddread	Mar 2014	#300
Kicking for paranoia-fueled hilariy	Pretzel_Warrior	Mar 2014	#301
ever been spied upon?	reddread	Mar 2014	#302
kicking for scaredy cats	reddread	Mar 2014	#306
There's a word for this: psyops	TroglodyteScholar	Mar 2014	#303
except in CNN	reddread	Mar 2014	#304
You can spot them by their shared emoticon	Capt. Obvious	Mar 2014	#305
kick	woo me with science	Mar 2014	#307
Recommend!	KoKo	Mar 2014	#308
kick	woo me with science	Mar 2014	#309

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.