Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

morningfog

(18,115 posts)
102. When you post are you anti-union? Anit-OWS? Pro-Zimmerman?
Thu Mar 22, 2012, 07:47 AM
Mar 2012

If you answered no to any of those, the OP was not directed at you. Me thinks you doth protest too much.

Honestly, I have no idea, nor do I care, how you post on any of the other subjects. I do remember how anti-OWS you are though.

In defense of George Zimmerman. [View all] UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 OP
Are you perhaps confusing support for the right to a fair trial with 'conservatism'? sikorsky Mar 2012 #1
"without so much as a formal charge" Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #9
Fine, you're willing to convict without a trial. I get it now. sikorsky Mar 2012 #11
The point is we want a trial Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #12
The accused in the case you just posted was arrested and will face trial Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #19
No, I am not mad but the tenor of the discussion clearly indicates a prejudice toward guilt sikorsky Mar 2012 #22
We want a trial. That's all we want Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #26
You're missing the whole point. If Zimmerman was on trial, this would be a non-story. Scuba Mar 2012 #98
It has national media coverage. It will go to trial. Mojorabbit Mar 2012 #89
We just want a trial Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #91
NO! He enumerated eight reasons why this whole mess stinks... TheMadMonk Mar 2012 #30
if this goes to trial and he's found guility with the existing SYG laws in place belcffub Mar 2012 #100
That's not what they wrote, Dude. Th1onein Mar 2012 #53
The Cops screwed up big time in this case. Massive negligence in collecting vital crunch60 Mar 2012 #96
Actually, I think all we want IS a trial Downtown Hound Mar 2012 #109
No, we want a trial, period. EOTE Mar 2012 #114
As the poster said, there is no charge yet. Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #37
Just one correction, the body was not in the morgue for three days. The shooting was on the 26th sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #48
Thank you for the correction Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #81
You rather miss the point that we want him to go to trial. So far he hasn't been charged and that is uppityperson Mar 2012 #20
How can there be a fair trail WHEN CHAIN OF EVIDENCE HAS BEEN COMPROMISED BEYOND belief? Justice wanted Mar 2012 #28
oh look another concerned n00b frylock Mar 2012 #35
Like flies to shit.... morningfog Mar 2012 #46
He can't get a fair trial until he is F***ING ARRESTED scheming daemons Mar 2012 #95
Zimmerman has not been tried nor convicted outside of the metaphorical LanternWaste Mar 2012 #108
sikorsky is no longer with us Cali_Democrat Mar 2012 #116
He is innocent until proven guilty in this country. But first, he has to be charged. appleannie1 Mar 2012 #2
No, he's a murderer. Whether he's charged or convicted is irrelevant to that fact. Son of Gob Mar 2012 #6
Absolutely right. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #8
False, actually. Lizzie Poppet Mar 2012 #16
Might be a fact. But until proven in a court of law, it's an unsubstantiated one. /nt TheMadMonk Mar 2012 #32
Steve Holt! DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2012 #56
You're welcome Son of Gob Mar 2012 #59
Well someone has not been paying attention. pennylane100 Mar 2012 #15
First, it has to be investigated to see if there's enough evidence... Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #42
I notice some of those supporting zimmerman are very new to DU.... peacebird Mar 2012 #3
Yup..happens all the time...nt joeybee12 Mar 2012 #4
I am probably one of those "supporters" and I resent that, I don't "support" HIM, I support his sikorsky Mar 2012 #14
Do you want him charge, brought to trial? Simple questions. Please answer. uppityperson Mar 2012 #21
I want a trial if that's the appropriate avenue. I don't know what 'evidence' exists and I don't sikorsky Mar 2012 #33
I have enough deleted posts so you'll just have to UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #50
So can I (imagine), and i have a vivid imagination Dragonfli Mar 2012 #72
"Don't know what evidence exists" my ass. groundloop Mar 2012 #83
Inadmissibility due to broken chain of custody is not in question... discntnt_irny_srcsm Mar 2012 #94
Why don't you Read Post #9. regarding evidence that was "overlooked" crunch60 Mar 2012 #97
I want to see him charged and brought to trial. You seem to think those of us frustrated by the pace peacebird Mar 2012 #25
And some have been lurking in the gungeon for a very long time. baldguy Mar 2012 #17
name NAMES....please!!! Mr. Magoo. Tuesday Afternoon Mar 2012 #93
yep. prolly have nra.org email addresses as well frylock Mar 2012 #36
The problem with these posters' positions, even though they may mean well, MoonRiver Mar 2012 #5
I don't think folks are saying he's guilty... KansDem Mar 2012 #7
Speak for yourself. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #23
Congratulations! Straw Man Mar 2012 #113
"You just threw our legal system out the window" 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #115
i'm saying he's guilty.. frylock Mar 2012 #39
No, what progressives want is a thorough investigation of this whole incident. mysuzuki2 Mar 2012 #10
Thank ya! Taverner Mar 2012 #13
Please do not question the motives of people who feel differently than you. TheWraith Mar 2012 #18
If there was something to wait for, people might be more inclined... TheMadMonk Mar 2012 #87
People who would do something like that should be you and you alone Dragonfli Mar 2012 #88
You can be a Heritage Foundation Disciple in love with guns and tax cuts and be Dragonfli Mar 2012 #24
So anyone who disagrees with the things you support... randome Mar 2012 #27
People are "guilty" of being conservatives because they support Conservative assumptions, thoughts Dragonfli Mar 2012 #31
You are so clueless, it's difficult to know how to address you. randome Mar 2012 #40
You do not think that conservative ideas and assumptions are conservative? Dragonfli Mar 2012 #44
Yeah, that doesn't sound personal at all. randome Mar 2012 #65
You took it personally, I was talking about conservatives, It appears part of you identifies as such Dragonfli Mar 2012 #69
What does your father's sexuality have to do with anything? Bluenorthwest Mar 2012 #78
An 'indication', nothing more, that I would have more in common... randome Mar 2012 #85
What Dragonfli said. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #52
Your hate of OWS brought you in. Hilarious! morningfog Mar 2012 #47
Another Black-and-Whiter heard from. randome Mar 2012 #66
Far from it. You should reread the OP. morningfog Mar 2012 #99
Guys! Look! Over here! randome Mar 2012 #101
When you post are you anti-union? Anit-OWS? Pro-Zimmerman? morningfog Mar 2012 #102
This is petty bickering between us. randome Mar 2012 #103
Respectfully, you dodged. This thread is about conservative postings on DU. morningfog Mar 2012 #104
No, you don't. But head on over to Freeperville and you'll have plenty. lib_wit_it Mar 2012 #110
"Innocent until proven guilty" is for frogmarch Mar 2012 #29
I sincerely hope you are never on a jury. sikorsky Mar 2012 #34
If I ever am, then frogmarch Mar 2012 #38
Stand Your Ground is the law Really people... Mar 2012 #41
Zimmerman is outside of that law...says the writer of the bill KeepItReal Mar 2012 #45
You should be ashamed. morningfog Mar 2012 #49
and here's another one.. frylock Mar 2012 #51
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #57
You've lost your way In life... DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2012 #58
I lost it long ago! Really people... Mar 2012 #61
Let's hope your stay is a short one. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #62
Lol Really people... Mar 2012 #64
Yes, they are often called sociopaths, look up the word. /nt Dragonfli Mar 2012 #67
I can see that. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #70
No, You haven't lost everything till you lose your soul... DianaForRussFeingold Mar 2012 #74
I generally support the SYG laws, and feelings have nothing to do with SYG. aikoaiko Mar 2012 #68
If he felt a black teenager walking quietly through the neighborhood was a threat to his life, he uppityperson Mar 2012 #73
In the years I've been reading and posting here... EmeraldCityGrl Mar 2012 #86
PPR'd. n/t X_Digger Mar 2012 #90
Since when is stalking and killing an innocent unarmed kid the law? lonestarnot Mar 2012 #92
in answer to your question: KG Mar 2012 #43
We appear to both not realize how conservatism is but one shade of progressiveness Dragonfli Mar 2012 #55
This progressive board tolerates extreme right wing positions on gun infatuation. Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #54
Bullseye. Paladin Mar 2012 #107
what if they are only one of those? Kali Mar 2012 #60
Yes. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #63
the maths don't work! Kali Mar 2012 #71
Seeing that the Democratic party has moved so far to the right, Quantess Mar 2012 #75
You put that very well, better by far than my attempts, simple and indisputable. Dragonfli Mar 2012 #77
Thanks! Quantess Mar 2012 #80
Perhaps the President should just put his name on the "kill by drone strike" list MNBrewer Mar 2012 #76
Makes as much sense as Zimmerman's "kill by gun strike", he also solved his goals sans Due Process Dragonfli Mar 2012 #79
Yeah, I'd be afraid of Holder if I were him. UnrepentantLiberal Mar 2012 #82
Well, there ya go! He has the right to defend himself against Holder, by shooting if he wants Dragonfli Mar 2012 #84
There needs to be an independent investigation and a trial. Atypical Liberal Mar 2012 #105
I own a gun (several, in fact), and would use it in self defense. Bake Mar 2012 #106
That's how I feel but he has to be arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #112
I see a difference between knowing in my arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #111
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In defense of George Zimm...»Reply #102