Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Good piece. n/t ProSense Mar 2012 #1
And of course, some folks who previously defended Krugman will throw him under the bus. Oh wait stevenleser Mar 2012 #17
Not a surprise that Mr. Free Trade loves forced corporate purchases. Romulox Mar 2012 #2
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #7
You don't read Krugman much, do you? lark Mar 2012 #23
You might be confusing Krugman with Friedman Orangepeel Mar 2012 #29
Unfortunately, there is no mistaken identity. Here's the Wall Street Journal's glowing review Romulox Mar 2012 #51
You can say that again. zipplewrath Mar 2012 #3
I'd ProSense Mar 2012 #4
It's called negotiation zipplewrath Mar 2012 #5
Well ProSense Mar 2012 #6
another false dichotomy zipplewrath Mar 2012 #9
Repeating ProSense Mar 2012 #12
But the PO was close zipplewrath Mar 2012 #13
What? ProSense Mar 2012 #14
I agree zipplewrath Mar 2012 #15
It did NOT federalize insurance regulation eridani Mar 2012 #31
Yeah, it did zipplewrath Mar 2012 #33
Yes, but implementation will be handled by states, many of which are very hostile to HCR n/t eridani Mar 2012 #34
Within federal regulation zipplewrath Mar 2012 #35
You asserted that the only better plan than the current Wealthcare and Profit Protection Act TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #48
A Perfect Storm approaches. bvar22 Mar 2012 #8
As much as I agree with you zipplewrath Mar 2012 #10
You are entitled to join Krugman in believing the these MILLIONS will go along happily, bvar22 Mar 2012 #16
How many will be "aware" zipplewrath Mar 2012 #19
Prices for policies on the exchange go up very, very quickly after age 50. amandabeech Mar 2012 #42
Expecting health care insurance companies to do "the right thing" OnyxCollie Mar 2012 #22
Their working knowledge of the ACA is poor now. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #25
You are radically underestimating the dept of the fury that will be unleashed in 2014. bvar22 Mar 2012 #27
Something like 60% of bankruptcies are related to medical costs. Approx 80% of those had insurance. riderinthestorm Mar 2012 #28
$2500 a year for a worthless policy will be cheap. amandabeech Mar 2012 #39
That will last until they try to use their shitty "bronze" coverage. eridani Mar 2012 #32
I think it's funny how much outrage resulted from saying that some people choose to be uninsured lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #36
"preexisting conditions" have been addressed ONLY for those in the Upper Middle Class... bvar22 Mar 2012 #37
Must have hit a nerve. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #38
Only for the insurance zipplewrath Mar 2012 #43
Yes. You DID hit a nerve, bvar22 Mar 2012 #45
The subsidy is to keep premiums to 10% of gross income, not to cover premiums for TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #49
Inaccurate. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #53
See my post #39. amandabeech Mar 2012 #40
So I should be happy about being forced to buy insurance and going bankrupt anyway? n/t eridani Mar 2012 #46
I wish I could rec this response. n/t MadrasT Mar 2012 #18
+1 n/t area51 Mar 2012 #20
You're very wrong about this. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #24
"When the perfect isn't an option, good is the goal." boxman15 Mar 2012 #26
I'm afraid not zipplewrath Mar 2012 #44
Hooray for Paul Krugman! qb Mar 2012 #11
K & R. n/t FSogol Mar 2012 #21
Glad that he's happy about 50% of all bankruptcies STILL to be caused by medical bills. eridani Mar 2012 #30
That's not a fact that I've seen before, and it is very, very telling. amandabeech Mar 2012 #41
It's really very simple. Their governments control health care prices eridani Mar 2012 #47
The U.S. government sets some Medicare costs. amandabeech Mar 2012 #52
Yes, but those powers were greatly curtailed for political purposes when it was enacted eridani Mar 2012 #54
Important point about this, the law doesn't work except to increase the percentage insured. TheKentuckian Mar 2012 #50
+100 n/t eridani Mar 2012 #55
Facts and estimates are very different things. lumberjack_jeff Mar 2012 #57
From 59% down to 50% is NOTHING to write home about eridani Mar 2012 #58
Wait until 2016, MadHound Mar 2012 #56
Wonder if Krugman also wants to eliminate Medicare eridani Mar 2012 #59
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Hurray for Health Reform ...»Reply #15