Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RKP5637

(67,086 posts)
9. "We the people" only benefit when it does not effect their
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 08:45 AM
Jan 2014

cash flow. When one goes asking millionaires for policies that might improve their lot too, but also effect the cash flow to those holding the purse strings and benefiting from their respective policies, it is a fool's errand in USA, Inc.

"We the people" hold the power in this country, but often have clouded vision when we vote.

One of the first solutions is to get the money, bribery and paybacks out of politics in this country. ... but many always think all D's are above this, it is not the case. For big $$$$$ often R=D=I.

How to accomplish clearing up this mess is a good question. To me, we went seriously off-track in the 80's with this inane concept of trickle down economics. We've seen how well thar works. To restore the balance in this country might well take several generations.

Under George W, the GOP Gave tax cuts to the Ultra Rich, and then truedelphi Jan 2014 #1
Seems like they all have embraced trickle down Enthusiast Jan 2014 #4
"We the people" only benefit when it does not effect their RKP5637 Jan 2014 #9
It was an attempt at negotiation jeff47 Jan 2014 #15
If what you say is true why Enthusiast Jan 2014 #17
He created it because of the 2010 losses. jeff47 Jan 2014 #22
I do not agree. Enthusiast Jan 2014 #23
Whether you agree or not doesn't particularly matter. jeff47 Jan 2014 #25
Your claim that Obama created the catfood commission/shifted to the right because left voters didn't El_Johns Jan 2014 #28
The creation of the commission does not coincide with Obama embracing austerity jeff47 Jan 2014 #30
I direct you to your post 22, in which you claim O. created the CC because of elections losses on El_Johns Jan 2014 #31
OMG!!!!! I USED THE WRONG WORD!!!!!!! jeff47 Jan 2014 #32
Won't cop to it. OK. El_Johns Jan 2014 #33
Edited while you were replying. jeff47 Jan 2014 #34
I'll let the public judge. I'm done here. El_Johns Jan 2014 #35
So, your errors are just fine. jeff47 Jan 2014 #36
You shouldn't, since the commission was created before the elections, months before. El_Johns Jan 2014 #29
I grow weary Enthusiast Jan 2014 #38
I hear ya. I imagine weariness is the desired reaction. El_Johns Jan 2014 #39
Oh, that has to be part of the objective. Enthusiast Jan 2014 #40
This message was self-deleted by its author Enthusiast Jan 2014 #37
Exactly! When it comes to big $$$$$ often R=D=I, but often RKP5637 Jan 2014 #6
Where We Are Today - How We Got Here - Who Sold Us Out cantbeserious Jan 2014 #2
+1 xchrom Jan 2014 #3
Kicked and recommended a whole bunch.....nt Enthusiast Jan 2014 #5
Progressivity of the income tax was eliminated for high incomes under Reagan... JHB Jan 2014 #7
+1 xchrom Jan 2014 #8
Those are fantastic graphs. Where did you find them? The rise and fall of the middle class pampango Jan 2014 #13
I didn't find them, I made them JHB Jan 2014 #24
Thank you for providing us with that information. Enthusiast Jan 2014 #19
Trickle down hasn't worked yet, but just needs a few more decades, kinda like the Cuban embargo. Scuba Jan 2014 #10
Yeah, that's the ticket! Enthusiast Jan 2014 #20
The Democratic Party was complicit. Warren Stupidity Jan 2014 #11
3 decades actually - it may have started before TBF Jan 2014 #12
k/r marmar Jan 2014 #14
Stop consuming. Barack_America Jan 2014 #16
And they continue to push for more by arguing for a "simplified" tax code. bullwinkle428 Jan 2014 #18
Funny how every time the tax code gets "simplified"... JHB Jan 2014 #26
Both parties actually. nt Demo_Chris Jan 2014 #21
kick JHB Jan 2014 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Have Been Throwing Ta...»Reply #9