Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
6. Depends on what the file contains.
Fri Mar 16, 2012, 09:47 AM
Mar 2012

First, I wouldn't accept a file of any kind unless I knew what it contained.
Second, I know what materials are copyright protected, and wouldn't accept any such file.
Third, if I know what's in the file and that it is copyright-protected, I wouldn't be interested.

You're making a naive argument that doesn't hold water. And, if you're downloading files when you don't know what they contain, you're taking some big risks. If you don't know that movies and commercial music isn't copyright-protected, you're not paying attention.

You can do as you please, but don't try those patently ridiculous arguments on me to try to justify illegal behavior. Both of us know better.

I stated my position. I don't download copyright protected property I haven't paid for. That's what I do. You can take any risks you choose.

Does downloading stuff from Youtube count? limpyhobbler Mar 2012 #1
Sounds like they're concentrating on P2P networks - so probably not GOTV Mar 2012 #3
Almost certainly not. Youtube has a policy MineralMan Mar 2012 #7
Huh, I thought they already did that. eShirl Mar 2012 #2
No worries here. I don't download pirated MineralMan Mar 2012 #4
I disagree. randome Mar 2012 #5
Depends on what the file contains. MineralMan Mar 2012 #6
how do you know it is copyrighted before you download it? d_r Mar 2012 #8
And, on the sites where those videos, games, and music MineralMan Mar 2012 #9
What if you must download the work in order to use the product you purchased? Occulus Mar 2012 #10
With P2P systems, free and copyrighted works are lumped together. randome Mar 2012 #12
When someone loans you a CD, they no longer have MineralMan Mar 2012 #16
I don't think the owner gets to determine as much as you think. randome Mar 2012 #18
Here is an example d_r Mar 2012 #20
Remember - it never was or will be about copyright - it's about maximizing profits. Initech Mar 2012 #11
Copyright exists to make sure the owner of a work can profit from it. MineralMan Mar 2012 #17
But you could argue that the property creator isnt the copyright holder. Initech Mar 2012 #21
On a case-by-case basis. MineralMan Mar 2012 #23
"it won't yet lead to a total cut off" BadgerKid Mar 2012 #13
I sincerely doubt this will be allowed to go forward. randome Mar 2012 #14
You mean inspecting content? BadgerKid Mar 2012 #15
Yeah, you're probably right. randome Mar 2012 #19
Would VPN's make this whole thing useless? Zalatix Mar 2012 #22
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»RIAA and ISPs to police y...»Reply #6