Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sibelian

(7,804 posts)
174. No, it fucking doesn't.
Sat Dec 28, 2013, 05:39 PM
Dec 2013

"Rape culture" is about as useful in describing male experiences as saying tax returns are a special kind of cheese. The term is nothing more than a great big big bag with "RAPE" written on it into which certain excited people throw anything that makes them feel freaky about themselves so that whatever they've thrown into the bag is all smeared and slobbered over with the emotional charge of the word RAPE. I've seen it used on this board to describe a six year old boy repeatedly kissing a (very understandbly) reluctant little girl. As a way of describing anything to do with the way politics is lensed out through gender it is NONSENSICAL.

I KNOW MEN WHO HAVE BEEN RAPED. I'm not using the idiotic, crack-addled and entirely USELESS term "rape culture" to label their experience any more than I would use the term "hip hop".

It's nothing more than a cynical attempt to manage away the male experience by controlling the terms used by them to describe themselves.

It's DISGUSTING.

I'm going to make damn sure that nobody in the gay community that *I* know is going to fall back into the twisted patterns demanded of them by feminists EVER again.

Feminists as individuals can be trusted, but feminism as a movement cannot. Believe me, I know.
No, I think liberals truly disagree treestar Dec 2013 #1
You think its really about "Getting Laid" FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #4
It's odd how much mature wisdom sometimes resembles being too tired to bother Fumesucker Dec 2013 #10
Yeah, exactly. Quantess Dec 2013 #205
Relating to actual human beings in a meaningful way is like that. PassingFair Dec 2013 #33
Kodachrome... Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #201
FFS NoOneMan Dec 2013 #5
+100.5 Katashi_itto Dec 2013 #58
Well that is what I think MRA types usually are treestar Dec 2013 #74
And that's what you honestly feel is going on here on DU? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #76
Absolute Rubbish. MicaelS Dec 2013 #100
i do not believe that to be true. too often i have a good conversation, whether agreement or not is seabeyond Dec 2013 #106
Is there really such tremendous desperation out there to get laid? Sarah Ibarruri Dec 2013 #189
Sorry, Tree, my girlfriends are smoking hot, highly sexual and liberal. They are also polite, kind, grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #195
Can you describe what the difference is between competing in a feminine way vs. PassingFair Dec 2013 #355
they were summer dresses as opposed to office suits? nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #356
Ahhh...we forgot the SUNDRESSES! PassingFair Dec 2013 #360
your laugh is infectious. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #369
Sure grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #576
Because clearly, this is a realistic example. PassingFair Dec 2013 #578
Masculinity and femininity are socially constructed ideals that should be deconstructed. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #417
hey... seabeyond Dec 2013 #424
I thought they were biological. grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #575
Nope. Social constructs. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #579
Feminist thought has a place on a liberal/Democratic message board... demmiblue Dec 2013 #2
I seek truth - don't exclude any honest, truthfull discussion FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #7
What IS MRA ideology? sibelian Dec 2013 #8
Denying that you become enraged if a woman decides not to sleep with you NoOneMan Dec 2013 #9
The hostility is just pouring out of your post. demmiblue Dec 2013 #16
Many feminists have a bizarre concept of what everyone else thinks NoOneMan Dec 2013 #18
Um, I would venture to guess that DU consists of an overwhelming majority of feminists... demmiblue Dec 2013 #27
No, not overwhelming, in that no man can be a feminist NoOneMan Dec 2013 #29
Yes, overwhelming. demmiblue Dec 2013 #39
No. NO man can be a feminist. The feminists movement entirely excludes men NoOneMan Dec 2013 #43
Please. bb is not the authority on The Feminist Movement. redqueen Dec 2013 #47
"The FACT is, most men on DU support feminist goals." NoOneMan Dec 2013 #60
A few vocal men ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #285
So despite men here saying they support feminist goals, polly7 Dec 2013 #290
I think you misread ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #316
"there are a few very vocal men denying rape culture, male privilege" NoOneMan Dec 2013 #318
Yes there are ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #325
No, I'm not up to the "challenge" NoOneMan Dec 2013 #328
I did really think you were ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #335
What issue? What side? What side do you think I am on? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #341
Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #349
Its hard to take the high road and be insulting at the same time, isn't it? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #350
Funny ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #364
. Squinch Dec 2013 #430
I'm not!? boston bean Dec 2013 #136
You might want to explain that to the 17 people who recommended the thread. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #358
Wow, 17 whole DUers agreed? Well hell, we should send a memo to the millions of other feminists redqueen Dec 2013 #370
LOL.. boston bean Dec 2013 #389
again lumberjack it was a thread of discussion, done in respect. not something to hide, seabeyond Dec 2013 #376
The belief that men can't be feminists is a legitimate viewpoint, and is obviously widely held. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #466
Not clicking your link, because it is more than likely shit-stirring for the sake of shit-stirring. demmiblue Dec 2013 #48
No, its actually quite relevant NoOneMan Dec 2013 #53
Still didn't read it. demmiblue Dec 2013 #62
Don't tell me what I have by guessing. If I did the same to the HOFers, they'll jump all over my... NoOneMan Dec 2013 #67
Well, at least you admit that you are a patriarchal, authoritative ass. demmiblue Dec 2013 #81
Cheers for the sarcasm inept NoOneMan Dec 2013 #84
Go sulk in the corner and suck your thumb because I won't... demmiblue Dec 2013 #89
Funny. Puglover Dec 2013 #94
he thinks it is a gotcha moment. i actually think it is a very good conversation about seabeyond Dec 2013 #167
You should have clicked it before you said it 'more than likely shit-stirring for the sake of sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #185
YES men can be feminists. Are you from the past? Matariki Dec 2013 #69
The HOFers exclude all men as feminists. Am I to dismiss this as bullshit? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #71
What is a HOFer? And what are you talking about? Matariki Dec 2013 #75
History of Feminism NoOneMan Dec 2013 #83
Thanks for the link Matariki Dec 2013 #90
No, I am not hostile to women NoOneMan Dec 2013 #93
I didn't say you were. I said that some of your posts come off that way. Matariki Dec 2013 #121
"then I extricate myself from the conversation" NoOneMan Dec 2013 #126
when most all of your posts have to include a diss against hof, even though you did not specifically seabeyond Dec 2013 #142
+1,000,000 I tried to read the last few days "feminist" post and have come to the conclusion Drew Richards Dec 2013 #226
if you will look at the very long discussion we had in the thread, you will see a lot of respect, seabeyond Dec 2013 #105
No, they don't. kcr Dec 2013 #204
Huh? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #438
I provided a link above.... NoOneMan Dec 2013 #444
Derp, just saw that. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #446
I'm not even sure how to measure footing in the fight towards equality... NoOneMan Dec 2013 #451
It's about privilege. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #454
The self-appointed leaders on DU are doing a bang-up job NoOneMan Dec 2013 #456
quit. just quit. this is your crap. this is a discussion board. no leaders. NONE. quit that seabeyond Dec 2013 #462
Jury results! sheshe2 Dec 2013 #482
i had that sent to me in pm. one person will not be alerting on my posts for a day..... seabeyond Dec 2013 #485
we value mens voice in hof. that was a challenging thread to have seabeyond Dec 2013 #458
It's true that there are many reasons to recommend a thread. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #487
Jury: Agreed that this is feminist-bashing. Having read several other posts by this person .. Coyotl Dec 2013 #95
Thnx. I qualified the statement. It was a hasty generalization. NoOneMan Dec 2013 #101
i do not believe we are nasty to people. i am sorry you feel that way and feel the need to seabeyond Dec 2013 #107
And there you go again! Coyotl Dec 2013 #323
Well, just so he knows - I'm a feminist, and so happy to be one! nt Sarah Ibarruri Dec 2013 #192
And some people have a bizarre concept of what feminists think. Coyotl Dec 2013 #98
Ya. True. I guess we could get a little clarity if we all strove towards civility and understanding NoOneMan Dec 2013 #104
The Tone Argument has nothing to do with "MRA types" redqueen Dec 2013 #116
Consider Occam's Razor. Maybe people think you are just being utterly rude and nasty NoOneMan Dec 2013 #119
I didn't make the term up. redqueen Dec 2013 #130
"that pretty much says all that needs to be said" NoOneMan Dec 2013 #138
I posted the Indian PSA, there was no insulting content. redqueen Dec 2013 #144
yes. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #147
a PSA made in india addressing what they feel is a very real issue is "insulting"? seabeyond Dec 2013 #164
Did I reference that thread anywhere? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #312
she was specific and you dismissed. when just putting soemthing up with nothing and being called as seabeyond Dec 2013 #330
"that you were in the middle of" NoOneMan Dec 2013 #332
whatever noneman. you are throwing out accusations and we are suppose to seabeyond Dec 2013 #337
I remember once upon a time when I Soundman Dec 2013 #551
+1000 n/t TroglodyteScholar Dec 2013 #371
O, Rly? opiate69 Dec 2013 #170
Thanks for the link! Squinch Dec 2013 #440
Damn...someone just drips hostility Katashi_itto Dec 2013 #20
Interesting NoOneMan Dec 2013 #25
Really? People are noting all the threads you don't rec? cui bono Dec 2013 #28
No, it's because you're too resenful to realize and accept that women's issues are HUMAN issues whathehell Dec 2013 #160
What does a vaginal knitting thread have to do with this? Sarah Ibarruri Dec 2013 #188
On DU, MRA is apparently defined as a man not agreeing with a certain group of women. RC Dec 2013 #45
MRA is short for what? Katashi_itto Dec 2013 #55
"MRA" means "men's rights activist." RC Dec 2013 #59
Thanks! Katashi_itto Dec 2013 #64
+1000 nt rrneck Dec 2013 #127
Human rights are what Feminism is all about. It does NOT exclude men! CTyankee Dec 2013 #151
We are on DU. RC Dec 2013 #157
I believe that Feminism is much more inclusive than that. CTyankee Dec 2013 #159
Actual Feminism, yes, DU's brand, by the select group of suspects here, not so much. RC Dec 2013 #168
why must you always insult us in every single one of your posts? seabeyond Dec 2013 #173
RC, referring to people as "suspects" is never a good idea if you wish to sell your idea. CTyankee Dec 2013 #177
Are you volunteering to be one of the usual suspects? RC Dec 2013 #222
this one, a PSA from india. that 130 recommended. and many voices. is your issue. not a handful. seabeyond Dec 2013 #232
Wait, you didn't see her as a suspect before, but now you are starting to see one? boston bean Dec 2013 #248
Way to twist things around there. RC Dec 2013 #259
Oh good to know. Are you being serious, you got a list? boston bean Dec 2013 #262
Yep and I have checked it several times and haven't had to up date for quite sometime. RC Dec 2013 #266
Who are you santa clause? LOL boston bean Dec 2013 #272
For some people, yes. RC Dec 2013 #297
Ya know what, RC? I'm done. I'm good. CTyankee Dec 2013 #308
One letter shy of "NRA." Talking Points, too! One acronym, many self-packaged slurs. Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #213
Anyone gonna answer this? grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #216
sure seabeyond Dec 2013 #243
Seems pretty obvious to me. nt redqueen Dec 2013 #13
Well, it isn't to me... sibelian Dec 2013 #23
No sh*t! etherealtruth Dec 2013 #172
+1 Hong Kong Cavalier Dec 2013 #253
"Runs the gamete?" Jackpine Radical Dec 2013 #3
Second that! grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #225
Hm. sibelian Dec 2013 #6
There is no MRA group here. polly7 Dec 2013 #11
Aren't women's rights a foundation of the Democratic Party? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #12
Agreed FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #15
They're not mutually exclusive. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #19
Exactly. cui bono Dec 2013 #22
How about 25% of men in prison are Raped FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #30
It's an issue. Feel free to go start a thread about it. n/t cui bono Dec 2013 #35
As I recall, sea and I were among the first to start calling out statements redqueen Dec 2013 #41
I certainly don't paint you as a disruptor FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #51
Here, this says most of what needs to be said on these issues much better than I could Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #50
I think the commonality of "False Acqusations" during Divorce Proceedings FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #57
What commonality of false allegations? Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #86
Wow. sibelian Dec 2013 #61
That is definitely an issue Matariki Dec 2013 #82
Male rape is a result of rape culture. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #96
Jesus fucking H Christ. sibelian Dec 2013 #108
Rape culture isn't just about women gollygee Dec 2013 #114
"Rape culture" seems to be about whatever anyone says its about. sibelian Dec 2013 #158
When did I say that? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #149
No, it fucking doesn't. sibelian Dec 2013 #174
Alright, I see what you mean. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #193
how about sexual brutality? Just a thought. It might get more play across the sexes and economic Drew Richards Dec 2013 #234
Sexual brutality is the act. Rape culture is the societal attitudes and practices Squinch Dec 2013 #452
I know what *I* call it. sibelian Dec 2013 #473
Ah, I get what you're saying. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #478
I stand humbled those two defining adjectives are the best way to describe it hands down. Drew Richards Dec 2013 #491
If it's deviating from the image of men kcr Dec 2013 #492
I think that Nuclear Dem was saying that rape is about rape, and no one should be raped. Squinch Dec 2013 #450
Not only that... DisgustedCynic Dec 2013 #542
women probably started the movement on this issue. i know on du, us feminists are the ones that seabeyond Dec 2013 #109
Well to be fair, polly7 Dec 2013 #113
you would be wrong. not from the start. though, many did come on board, in time. seabeyond Dec 2013 #115
Well I'm positive you didn't read every post then, because I saw and participated in, polly7 Dec 2013 #120
ya. pretty sure it was redq and i. a new concept that had to be accepted. seabeyond Dec 2013 #123
Na ...... it was a lot more people than you and redqueen way back then, right from the start. nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #124
I only said we were among the first. redqueen Dec 2013 #133
Agreed, this issue goes back to DU 1 and 2 maddezmom Dec 2013 #122
That's exactly how I remember it. nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #125
YES! The Feminist men in my family and my life know this and they love and respect the feminist CTyankee Dec 2013 #91
How are issues important to men, liberal issues of course, being excluded? cui bono Dec 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #247
I have been trashcanning them and Duck Dynasty threads. n/t PowerToThePeople Dec 2013 #14
"Fringe groups"? "Democrat"? Is this thread meant to divide and conquer? cui bono Dec 2013 #17
In terms of the average voter - How do you think that "Ranks" for a vote deciding issue FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #24
What does that have to do with what I posted? Whether or not something is a voting issue does not cui bono Dec 2013 #34
Should the world revolve around sexism and women's issues FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #37
Are DUers only able to discuss one issue at a time? cui bono Dec 2013 #38
People did ask LGBT and black posters that question, often, during the primaries. redqueen Dec 2013 #42
*sigh* It's a wonder anyone actually thinks DU is a liberal board. cui bono Dec 2013 #44
Its only "Human Nature" that 1 issue be more important to you FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #72
Again you post something that has nothing at all to do with what I said. cui bono Dec 2013 #180
You hit it on the head here. "fringe" my ass. bettyellen Dec 2013 #214
+100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 BainsBane Dec 2013 #165
Your subject line is screwing up the thread view pintobean Dec 2013 #171
The "right side" you say? Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #236
This message was self-deleted by its author tammywammy Dec 2013 #386
The problem is when violence is conflated with looking at a girl who is dressed to kill. grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #217
so the way she dresses has to do with how she is treated? seabeyond Dec 2013 #252
I think this "MRA" is largely a bogeyman. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #26
Me too NoOneMan Dec 2013 #31
The National Coalition for Men (ncfm.org) ranks #1,293,376 on Alexa. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #46
Bwaa-ha-ha!! Drag those troglodytes into the light of day! Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #260
Wait, what?? TroglodyteScholar Dec 2013 #380
I'm sorry, I meant Morlocks... Morlocks. That's it. Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #415
... TroglodyteScholar Dec 2013 #464
It's a growing movement, and they are dangerous. redqueen Dec 2013 #56
How are they dangerous? sibelian Dec 2013 #85
The articles at the links contain a lot of information about that. nt redqueen Dec 2013 #99
OMG! 232 viewers on Reddit! Man, er, staff, the barricades! Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #210
Read the articles. These men are changing laws. redqueen Dec 2013 #245
Half of those 200 some-odd are probably from here, looking for "material" to be outraged about. MADem Dec 2013 #377
Well said MADem maddezmom Dec 2013 #395
are we feminists allowed to address the man we should speak femininely and wear sundresses, seabeyond Dec 2013 #443
Sure you can maddezmom Dec 2013 #447
Between the first women's right's convention and women getting the vote, there Squinch Dec 2013 #459
Sure does, but I have seen the same battles on DU for about 10 years maddezmom Dec 2013 #463
I've been on DU since 2001 kcr Dec 2013 #477
Well am I a feminist and I agree maddezmom Dec 2013 #479
I'm sorry you were treated badly by another feminist kcr Dec 2013 #481
yes. i do believe that staying silent in sexism only allows it to grow. and yes, i will seabeyond Dec 2013 #460
Sorry sea but you have called women/fellow feminists because we haven't joined in certain threads maddezmom Dec 2013 #468
i am not gonna argue or try to defend such a general statement but i can absolutely agree with the seabeyond Dec 2013 #470
So following DU's Community Standards Waiting For Everyman Dec 2013 #461
wtf.... seabeyond Dec 2013 #465
Do you think that's what she was saying? kcr Dec 2013 #474
Having trouble following the subject? Waiting For Everyman Dec 2013 #494
I'm having no trouble at all. kcr Dec 2013 #500
So you think certain feminists are exempt from Community Standards? Waiting For Everyman Dec 2013 #506
I'm not following how thinking women should be able to wear what they want kcr Dec 2013 #508
Lol! Sure. Waiting For Everyman Dec 2013 #510
I guess the idea that women should be able to dress as they please kcr Dec 2013 #512
Why Waiting For Everyman Dec 2013 #519
See my edit. n/t kcr Dec 2013 #520
Did you read the articles I linked? This isn't about "bad behavior", but about changing laws. redqueen Dec 2013 #439
Until today, I didn't realize "MRA" was not a formal organization... Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #244
It is entirely a bogeyman lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #361
This message was self-deleted by its author redqueen Dec 2013 #375
I don't think it's a matter of divide and conquer. mokawanis Dec 2013 #32
I think there are a few trolls up in there, having a great time. MADem Dec 2013 #36
The poll doesn't match the question asked hootinholler Dec 2013 #40
'Gender issues' are counterproductive. Vox Moi Dec 2013 #49
Disagree on equal pay JustAnotherGen Dec 2013 #161
I ended up hiding those forums liberalmuse Dec 2013 #52
I did that yesterday. Front page looks much better once again! NoOneMan Dec 2013 #73
Are the threads on LGBT issues meant to divide and conquer? BainsBane Dec 2013 #54
I don't think the OP ever mentioned the word 'Trivial' Raine1967 Dec 2013 #134
The subtext is clear BainsBane Dec 2013 #153
I've noticed that ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #301
Did you see post #78? redqueen Dec 2013 #156
Yes, I did. and you bet there is room for interpretation. Raine1967 Dec 2013 #237
Did I SAY it was "all about women"? He's saying feminist topics should be banned from GD. redqueen Dec 2013 #250
he's also saying something else. Raine1967 Dec 2013 #261
On slow news days these threads are more common. Laelth Dec 2013 #63
I find it really unfortunate that any progressives think women's issues are 'fringe' Matariki Dec 2013 #65
Feels like a no win situation to me libodem Dec 2013 #66
Well said, libodem. polly7 Dec 2013 #79
And thus divisive libodem Dec 2013 #117
It's impossible to know who the trolls are and who the genuine posters are. liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #128
Yes libodem Dec 2013 #140
I don't really understand the agenda either of demonizing progressives polly7 Dec 2013 #137
wouldnt it be nice that ALL agree. unfortantely that has not been the case. we see it in abortion, seabeyond Dec 2013 #148
Very good points, polly7 libodem Dec 2013 #169
No, but I find I'm able to cover everything I enjoy posting about regarding injustices polly7 Dec 2013 #279
It's not my narrative either libodem. When you look around the globe at liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #118
Well said. rrneck Dec 2013 #139
If you disagree with some here you're just a pathetic "eager female cohort" to the men. tammywammy Dec 2013 #154
Dogs, pathetic creatures who live for the attention of men, MRA cheerleaders, polly7 Dec 2013 #162
Well, pat me on the head libodem Dec 2013 #166
It became clear a long time ago LadyHawkAZ Dec 2013 #514
Sadly I don't think there will ever be actual discussion on these topics on DU. n/t tammywammy Dec 2013 #516
Sadly, I suspect you're right n/t LadyHawkAZ Dec 2013 #517
My goodness. Thank you for your display of guts. Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #255
guts? she expressed her opinion. no one said a word. lol. it is as it should be. lmfao seabeyond Dec 2013 #258
Yes, but due to the tone of them, not the issues nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #68
I'm sorry, you're spouting MRA garbage. I know, cause I read it in the HOF. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #135
Since I studiously avoid both groups, nadinbrzezinski Dec 2013 #294
Consensus achieved. I say keep all feminism/MRA Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #70
AGREED - if they want a "Playground to sling mud in" FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #78
Every time you fix a private sandbox rrneck Dec 2013 #141
good it will keep them busy... Niceguy1 Dec 2013 #342
Sandbox! Sandbox! grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #289
Concur. (n/t) Shandris Dec 2013 #129
so, we exclude womens issues on a progressive board? that is odd. how about class issues?, racisim seabeyond Dec 2013 #150
It is exactly for this reason that I concur. Shandris Dec 2013 #175
this was the post you concured with. i do not know what i did wrong in interpretating you agreed seabeyond Dec 2013 #178
Perhaps you are thinking of 'board' in a different manner than I did... Shandris Dec 2013 #182
feminists actually think that feminist issue are issues about women. but, thank you. i may have seabeyond Dec 2013 #184
No problems, it's very easy for us to both get confused on a medium... Shandris Dec 2013 #190
conversation. i do love. really, lol. PSA from india. that would be a subject some may see seabeyond Dec 2013 #198
I would definitely not want to be the one who had to make the decision... Shandris Dec 2013 #219
lol... seabeyond Dec 2013 #249
No kidding. This is f***ing embarrassing LittleBlue Dec 2013 #132
Why? Why not allow feminism discussion in GD? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #197
No. It bothers me some use it to browbeat others over Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #220
back.... and ya. some of use see the harm in giving "a woman scorned" because we understand how seabeyond Dec 2013 #257
No one told you you couldn't speak out about it! polly7 Dec 2013 #268
I do protect your right to speak out as you've seen. Pretzel_Warrior Dec 2013 #339
You do have the right to speak out, Seabeyond... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #546
that would be a given seabeyond Dec 2013 #554
No, she was flagged because she was being alert stalked. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #283
That's not true Violet_Crumble Dec 2013 #333
People see the alerts. They don't have to know who alerts to know they're bs alerts. kcr Dec 2013 #527
I saw them and understand why each and every one was hidden.... Violet_Crumble Dec 2013 #529
I'm sorry, but I don't agree. kcr Dec 2013 #530
We'll have to agree to disagree... Violet_Crumble Dec 2013 #537
That might be part of it kcr Dec 2013 #539
Why not allow I/P or Gun Issues in GD? NoOneMan Dec 2013 #362
Good question.... Violet_Crumble Dec 2013 #531
Really Violet? Sincerely, you think feminist issues ought not be posted in GD? boston bean Dec 2013 #549
Sorry, I meant to add a clarfication to my post yesterday... Violet_Crumble Dec 2013 #596
They end up being divisive because DU is too big tent. kcr Dec 2013 #535
This is what I learned on DU NobodyHere Dec 2013 #77
I'll venture your still young FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #80
What? redqueen Dec 2013 #145
When is it OK to look at a sexy woman, and telegraph that you want her? grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #292
Staring is always rude. Whether at a woman, or anyone else. redqueen Dec 2013 #299
"hitting on people should be a rarity, that time when all the planets align." Seriously? grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #556
Seriously? Lovers already know each other, obviously, so that's completely unrelated to this issue. redqueen Dec 2013 #581
I guess it's OK if she's wearing a sundress but don't stare at any of those masculine women in suits PassingFair Dec 2013 #431
he also believes we should not creep shame. he had an op on the subject. seabeyond Dec 2013 #434
OMG I live in Hollywood, it happens everyday. I actually find it flattering. grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #557
ahhh, the shallowness of hollywood, lol. that just explains so much. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #560
Here's a good primer. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #457
Not bad, but I have asked some women what they were listening to on their mobile device and its led grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #561
What the hell did you THINK you'd learn? PassingFair Dec 2013 #374
you are doing it again. seabeyond Dec 2013 #381
Good in theory, but sometimes there is a loneliness that only love can fill. grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #565
Why so many posts complaining of the existence of this debate? treestar Dec 2013 #87
I don't see too much "Discussing" in those threads FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #92
That's the most revealing part of all this. redqueen Dec 2013 #112
Everyone has their own "very important" issues in the party. Tierra_y_Libertad Dec 2013 #88
No one knows how it started klook Dec 2013 #97
Yes, but it's not a distraction. nt rrneck Dec 2013 #102
Like this thread? retread Dec 2013 #103
exactly. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #111
Those threads divided and conquered DU for a few days before and during Christmas. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #110
feminist issues should be of interest to democrats A Little Weird Dec 2013 #131
This poll presumes that all we should be talking about here is the 2014 midterms. DanTex Dec 2013 #143
AND, gender issues are sure to be a VERY important part of the 2014 election Squinch Dec 2013 #467
I cannot imagine how to "divide and conquer" a website as fractured as DU Demeter Dec 2013 #146
This is just unfreakin believable. boston bean Dec 2013 #152
I haven't been around much... one_voice Dec 2013 #411
Because the Democratic Party should only consider issues of importance BainsBane Dec 2013 #155
See Gamete run ... GeorgeGist Dec 2013 #163
While I think they CAN be divisive ... 1StrongBlackMan Dec 2013 #176
This whole debate arises out of a mutual confusion Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #179
please point out where a single post from junior or otherwise feminist uses all men in anything. seabeyond Dec 2013 #181
The point of my post was not to find examles on DU Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #191
i am sorry. personal ownership is important to me. as is truth. the foundation of what i post. seabeyond Dec 2013 #202
It's not a personal ownership, seabeyond. Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #206
thank you. i can easily keep my eyes open to any feminist suggesting it is all men, at any time, seabeyond Dec 2013 #212
Thanks! That's it exactly, IMO. I think feminism without femininity breeds patriarchy, as it puts grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #223
Competition IS the terms of the masculine ethos Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #235
That's why radical feminists focus on patriarchy as the source. redqueen Dec 2013 #280
You don't see the reverse as true? Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #305
Biological determinism only goes so far, though. redqueen Dec 2013 #321
sorry but that is a generalization and a stereotype. liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #238
How does femininity relate to feminism? grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #240
Some women enjoy wearing business suits. There is nothing liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #256
Radical feminism seeks to end the ridiculous concept of "femininity". redqueen Dec 2013 #284
feminism without femininity? how a woman dresses? just eeew. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #254
But we're the problem on DU. kcr Dec 2013 #264
yup. and dare to say eeeew, to a man that demands women be his version of feminine to be heard. seabeyond Dec 2013 #265
But we just want to divide DU kcr Dec 2013 #282
they ignore them? nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #288
Or they actually agree with them kcr Dec 2013 #291
Who is 'them' polly7 Dec 2013 #293
Who is them? kcr Dec 2013 #296
Bullshit! polly7 Dec 2013 #300
I didn't say you did. kcr Dec 2013 #304
I didn't ask you what a humanist was, and obviously you don't have a clue. polly7 Dec 2013 #307
Pardon me. You asked me what was wrong with being a humanist. kcr Dec 2013 #311
As didn't anyone else here. I guess whatever point you were thinking you made was polly7 Dec 2013 #314
i am sorry. i get i have nothing to do with any of this. but i am sorry. seabeyond Dec 2013 #336
Really? polly7 Dec 2013 #340
Eh. It's the internet kcr Dec 2013 #347
Good. Glad to see you got out that mirror. nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #378
I know. It's only the feminists who get nasty. n/t kcr Dec 2013 #382
Aw. there's that old switcheroo again! polly7 Dec 2013 #388
Or you could claim someone's making things up kcr Dec 2013 #390
Well yeah, I did just claim it. Because it's true. Your posts are STILL here. nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #393
Or, maybe, when discussing things on DU kcr Dec 2013 #399
Jeebus, calm down. polly7 Dec 2013 #403
Jeebus, calm down.... seriously? you are suggesting kcr calm down as you have reamed her thru out seabeyond Dec 2013 #410
I've 'reamed her'!!! polly7 Dec 2013 #419
yes!!!!! seabeyond Dec 2013 #425
Proud of all that are you? polly7 Dec 2013 #426
I've 'reamed her'!!! yes!!!!! you really do not get it when i say i stop reading your posts seabeyond Dec 2013 #432
Oh I don't blame you - again! (and again and again) polly7 Dec 2013 #435
But you did the very same thing, in the very beginning. kcr Dec 2013 #413
I made nothing up. polly7 Dec 2013 #420
Okay, polly kcr Dec 2013 #427
You DID ascribe things to me I didn't say, ffs. polly7 Dec 2013 #429
Nope. kcr Dec 2013 #433
You said I asked you what a humanist was. polly7 Dec 2013 #436
Talk about muddying the waters kcr Dec 2013 #441
k. So stop the nasty crap towards me, if you're now admitting this. polly7 Dec 2013 #442
Well, I'm really sorry n/t kcr Dec 2013 #445
I don't know if you're sincere or not, but I'll gladly take that, and polly7 Dec 2013 #448
Yeah, kcr! You "accused her" of asking you a question! redqueen Dec 2013 #414
Read better. nt, polly7 Dec 2013 #422
true that. and you are probably right. seabeyond Dec 2013 #295
It's a shame the way you're treated on DU, Sea kcr Dec 2013 #298
Well I certainly know of no one else who's harvested delicate, personal information polly7 Dec 2013 #303
Well, I've never known anyone who broke into a safe, stole the hope diamond kcr Dec 2013 #306
Trivializing cruelty upon another woman. polly7 Dec 2013 #310
Well, I wouldn't trivialize grand theft, either kcr Dec 2013 #313
They weren't wild accusations. polly7 Dec 2013 #315
Well kcr Dec 2013 #317
No shit! polly7 Dec 2013 #320
Yes, basically that whole conversation of your twisting words and playing gotcha kcr Dec 2013 #322
LMAO!!!!! polly7 Dec 2013 #324
And the whole point of your posting revealed. n/t kcr Dec 2013 #326
Oh, hell no! polly7 Dec 2013 #329
You asked me what was wrong with being a humanist. kcr Dec 2013 #331
Wow. polly7 Dec 2013 #334
More twisting kcr Dec 2013 #343
It may come across that way to you. polly7 Dec 2013 #345
Well, why aren't you just 'you'? kcr Dec 2013 #351
First - WHERE did I call you ugly? Was that another of your 'mistakes'? polly7 Dec 2013 #354
Many denigrate half the population? Really? kcr Dec 2013 #357
So I didn't call you ugly? polly7 Dec 2013 #359
I guess we didn't read the same HOF then. kcr Dec 2013 #363
Or you conveniently miss all the nasty bullshit when it's directed towards those polly7 Dec 2013 #365
Otherwise known as confirmation bias. opiate69 Dec 2013 #367
Exactly. polly7 Dec 2013 #368
Amazing isn't it maddezmom Dec 2013 #379
It sure is, maddezmom. polly7 Dec 2013 #383
Wow kcr Dec 2013 #263
Holy shit! Here, grab a sundress and come with us! Retreat! PassingFair Dec 2013 #408
lol lol. and CALM down. someone is gonna have to define feminine for me though. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #412
OMG you were serious about the sundresses! PassingFair Dec 2013 #385
you did it a third time... lol. ah hahahah. got to this point i see. and the dots are connected. seabeyond Dec 2013 #394
I am in a state of bemused disbelief. Come on, girls, back to HOF!! PassingFair Dec 2013 #404
sheeeit, we have the sundresses on now, we will be safe. and... heard. hear me roar, lol. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #416
Oh, come on. You didn't just say that, did you? Squinch Dec 2013 #476
i am gigglin'. you are making me giggle. this thread was worth every womans shock seabeyond Dec 2013 #486
I could swear I read that, but maybe I'm just dreaming that I live in crazy town. Squinch Dec 2013 #534
Apparently, yes, lol! grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #568
You know that's really loony, right? Squinch Dec 2013 #573
Please tell me you were being sarcastic. nt stevenleser Dec 2013 #504
Not a chance, and, grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #569
So, women in business meetings should be wearing sundresses because then they'll get more dates? Squinch Dec 2013 #574
ROFL, at this point, why not! grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #577
Why not? Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #582
Wow. That's pretty ridiculous. Unless you're over 80. Which is what I am guessing. Squinch Dec 2013 #592
Because the goal of dating is quantity of dates, not quality? Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #585
Hmmmm. I just got the phone number of a charming waitress... grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #588
Cool story bro. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #589
From my experience, grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #590
Oh good so anything a woman does is a sign of her interest. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #591
Of course not, but if caresses grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #593
I think your attempt to diversify your opinion is amusing. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #594
No, I love my mineshaft! In my view, women feeling compelled to wear suits to a business meeting grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #597
It's important to take your argument within context. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #598
Not what I'm trying to express. grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #599
Because obviously it's normal and natural and "correct" for women to wear... sundresses? MadrasT Dec 2013 #544
Yes, ladies, it is completely normal and natural for women to wear sundresses:) grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #571
Come on, then--something for everyone. The fight isn't over until men feel free to MADem Dec 2013 #548
False equivalency. boston bean Dec 2013 #242
I may have intentionally Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #246
When Republicans were obstructing progress and hurting this country kcr Dec 2013 #373
yes kcr. this is how i see it. and this is what the suggestion reminded me of. we know, seabeyond Dec 2013 #397
It's exactly what it reminds me of. kcr Dec 2013 #406
Maybe the false equivalency Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #401
See my post 406 kcr Dec 2013 #407
not one feminist has accused any du man a rapist. and not one feminsit has claimed all du men seabeyond Dec 2013 #423
Again, I wasn't addressing Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #449
i type words. plain and simple. if somebody reads something into it, i will clarify. anyone can seabeyond Dec 2013 #469
There will be other threads Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #480
i know that is NOT what you were going for. why i pause.... and will pay attention later. seabeyond Dec 2013 #484
Well no, there were a couple of threads... (TRIGGER WARNING) redqueen Dec 2013 #453
yes. seabeyond Dec 2013 #475
Oh, my Goddess libodem Dec 2013 #302
If it's any consolation Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #309
Yes libodem Dec 2013 #352
Sorry you had to encounter people like that Shankapotomus Dec 2013 #366
I'll get over it libodem Dec 2013 #372
Feminism has it's own section in topics. Shouldn't all posts be in the Feminism sarcasmo Dec 2013 #183
no discussion of womens issues in GD? AA and lbgt has its own forum. no race or gay issues seabeyond Dec 2013 #186
Let it get over run by one topic then the section becomes dominated by one topic. sarcasmo Dec 2013 #187
Why is that a bad thing? NuclearDem Dec 2013 #208
I'm not saying don't discuss them FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #196
i cannot really address that as i have started no OPs in GD. nt seabeyond Dec 2013 #203
And I'm not pointing fingers at anyone or any 1 group FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #209
i can hear you on that. what i cannot see though, a PSA that is valued, appreciated by many, seeing seabeyond Dec 2013 #215
You lost me there - What PSA ? FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #428
this is what started the last round. seabeyond Dec 2013 #437
Don't know what to think of arguing about that FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #472
Where's the option for "It's what passes for a hobby, for a group of people who dearly miss META" Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #194
I think the people who endlessly argue back and forth and back and forth might want liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #200
Intellectual Masturbation FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #211
"I still jerk off manually" Warren DeMontague Dec 2013 #221
OTHER - Where's the entertain and LMFAO button, HAHA! grahamhgreen Dec 2013 #199
Is there something going on? Agschmid Dec 2013 #207
Feminists got uppity again, is the short of it. nt boston bean Dec 2013 #228
What get me kcr Dec 2013 #218
Personally I like to concentrate my efforts on working with men and women liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #224
Nothing wrong with that. kcr Dec 2013 #231
I don't think any DUer is above being told they are being obnoxious stevenleser Dec 2013 #241
Of course not. But I don't think that's what's happening. kcr Dec 2013 #251
You're kidding, right? Did you see the links I gave you? Anti-semitism is a huge issue here. stevenleser Dec 2013 #267
Where did I say it wasn't? kcr Dec 2013 #270
Now we are getting somewhere. stevenleser Dec 2013 #275
No kcr Dec 2013 #276
it was not strawman steven, it was experience. i am well aware of your argument. i know what you seabeyond Dec 2013 #287
It's a total strawman. I said one thing, you changed it to mean something else. stevenleser Dec 2013 #495
your whole post is about feminists shutting up about porn. YOU do not get to tell us feminists what seabeyond Dec 2013 #501
No, it's not. That is your strawman. You dont get to tell me what my words are after twisting them. stevenleser Dec 2013 #502
bullshit. you and i both know the difference you refer about the two waves. your fuckin porn. seabeyond Dec 2013 #507
Two of your favorite underhanded tactics in one subject line. Strawman and accusation of "my porn" stevenleser Dec 2013 #511
it is a hoot and so are you. seabeyond Dec 2013 #518
excuse me - Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2013 #521
For the record, I was not the alerter. nt stevenleser Dec 2013 #522
I didn't think you were, stevenleser. I have my suspicions as to whom it is and, it is not you. n/t Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2013 #523
Didn't mean to imply you were accusing me, just wanted that out there. nt stevenleser Dec 2013 #525
Although I have to say I agree with the alert, even if I didn't push the button myself. stevenleser Dec 2013 #526
I think she meant it as the general you not, the personal you. That is how I took it. Tuesday Afternoon Dec 2013 #528
Yep, she did as you note. She and several other folks routinely accuse people of that who stevenleser Dec 2013 #532
steven.... we have had conversation about this for a very long time. no, it is not the seabeyond Dec 2013 #538
but, you argue porn is fine and has value. so it is not an insult to you. there is nothing wrong seabeyond Dec 2013 #536
No, that is not what I argue. Are we going to set a strawman record for you in this thread? stevenleser Dec 2013 #540
omg. i brought levity to the thread with my cartoon. thanks tuesday. seabeyond Dec 2013 #524
so you, will define what we are allowed to discuss? nah. doesnt work that way steven. seabeyond Dec 2013 #271
Thank you for giving a perfect example of what I am talking about. nt stevenleser Dec 2013 #273
we already went thru the attempted purge of some feminist discussion. it failed. seabeyond Dec 2013 #277
What attempted purge of feminist discussion? nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #286
Yeah, I can't wait to see the answer to that one, since only the admins would be able to do such a stevenleser Dec 2013 #496
There won't be an answer. polly7 Dec 2013 #497
If I recall, you wanted HoF shut down. boston bean Dec 2013 #553
Glass houses give an illusion of spaciousness. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #558
I'm not the one denying it ever happened. boston bean Dec 2013 #559
You started it. No you did... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #562
Yeah, but I'm not entirely sure how that fits here. boston bean Dec 2013 #563
LOL...okay. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #570
Sorry... it sounded as if you were criticizing someone for trying to shut down your group. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #566
To me it sounded exactly as what I wrote. boston bean Dec 2013 #567
Do yourself a favor, LJ... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #572
The wars would NOT be "never ending", because the posters would be banned immediately. PassingFair Dec 2013 #418
If you actually clicked on the links, you would see that is not true. stevenleser Dec 2013 #493
I think these are legitimate issues. I stay away from most the threads though Number23 Dec 2013 #227
I am not afraid I'm going to get raped every time I leave the house like women liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #230
Thank you for so exquisitely making my point Number23 Dec 2013 #233
thank you for only taking a part of what I said and disregarding the rest. liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #239
There was no argument. Your intentions may be good but that comment was exactly why Number23 Dec 2013 #269
You know nothing about me, but go on believing that you can judge the entirety of who I am based liberal_at_heart Dec 2013 #278
If you'd rather put me on ignore than check your own cultural biases, that's on you Number23 Dec 2013 #281
+1, a little self reflection goes a mile. boston bean Dec 2013 #344
I wouldn't have minded actually having a conversation about it, to be honest Number23 Dec 2013 #488
You really truly did prove the point, in this case. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #409
. Squinch Dec 2013 #483
It's sad that it has come to this. stevenleser Dec 2013 #229
That makes a lot of sense libodem Dec 2013 #338
Yep, Look at my #267 and the response in #271 stevenleser Dec 2013 #498
. libodem Dec 2013 #505
Yes, and for the first time in almost 10 years... Hosnon Dec 2013 #274
There is a certain group of people... one_voice Dec 2013 #319
and there is this... CTyankee Dec 2013 #327
A means by whom to divide and conquer? Iggo Dec 2013 #346
This thread shows that DU is at least finally admitting that there are MRA posters here. Squinch Dec 2013 #348
Who? polly7 Dec 2013 #353
People who do these things: NoOneMan Dec 2013 #384
Wow, that's quite the thread. nt polly7 Dec 2013 #398
Yep, a long thread about trying to characterize DUers as MRAs. stevenleser Dec 2013 #503
I'm starting to see it as similar to how Bush needed to invent terra in Iraq ... polly7 Dec 2013 #509
That is an interesting observation. It certainly is a lot of time and effort invested stevenleser Dec 2013 #513
Exactly, steven. nt polly7 Dec 2013 #515
That is not an MRA. Not even close. 10 seconds on an actual MRA website will show you that. stevenleser Dec 2013 #499
Careful, remember the threat of libel lawsuits, and PPR campaigns. redqueen Dec 2013 #387
Considering some of the sites you've linked to and the ugly crap you've introduced here polly7 Dec 2013 #391
Your posts contain so much projection, it's not even funny. nt redqueen Dec 2013 #402
No, they don't. polly7 Dec 2013 #405
Eek! Squinch Dec 2013 #392
Name one, then we'll ask him if you're right. n/t lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #471
You can see the divide and conquer right in this very thread. Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #396
+1 Marr Dec 2013 #455
I find it interesting that a thread on one of these subjects was posted a couple hours after this: Vashta Nerada Dec 2013 #489
Try explaining the idiocy of idiots to the idiots themselves. Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #400
+1000 TheBlackAdder Dec 2013 #533
over 400 replies and over 5000 views..... madrchsod Dec 2013 #421
It's not only intended to disrupt, it's inherently and entirely a strawman. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #490
There is not one person on DU who self-identifies as a Republican troll. Is that evidence there are seaglass Dec 2013 #545
One can go to other websites... lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #555
This message was self-deleted by its author davidn3600 Dec 2013 #541
Other...since I don't think disagreeing with the HOF crowd... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #543
I think both groups take their issues seriously - TBF Dec 2013 #547
Good post trumad Dec 2013 #550
No, I don't think there's any conspiracy. Crunchy Frog Dec 2013 #552
If one is truly a supporter of equality, evaluate each argument against the equal rights amendment. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #564
How did you get it in your head that a single law... Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #580
The authors of the ERA did it perfectly. lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #583
Ah but does the law mention the difference between sex and gender? Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #584
Give me an example of a sexually discriminatory law that would pass ERA muster. n/t lumberjack_jeff Dec 2013 #586
My point this whole time has been that making the ERA... Gravitycollapse Dec 2013 #587
SIMPLE... This recent madness needs to be discussed in one or more of the gender forums. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #595
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are the Feminist / MRA Ar...»Reply #174