General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: No charges ever pressed: Assange marks three years of UK detention [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)against Assange, because the Swedish Prosecutor has refused to conduct the required interview with him before she can file charges, as required by Swedish law.
She refused, while he remained in Sweden in order to try to get an interview with.
She refused when he made himself available to her in London.
She has been offered the opportunity to take advantage, as a member of the EU, to interview him anytime she wants to.
And yes, Sweden and other EU member states have taken advantage of this privilege to interview suspects in ANY EU country.
But for some reason this Prosecutor is and has avoided conducting that interview for going on four years now.
Seems to me that at the very least, she isn't too concerned about getting 'justice' for those women she claims are victims.
And at worst, which is now the general consensus she knows she has no case and doesn't want to have to present her 'evidence' because from the small peek we have had of that evidence, it wouldn't hold up in a kindergarten class.
Finally, a majority of intelligent people around the globe, know exactly what this is all about and the longer the Swedish Prosecutor refuses to file charges, the more obvious it becomes that she never had a case and the first Prosecutor was correct when she dismissed it.