He was right about George Bush. (Reply #100)

In the discussion thread: 'long-hidden footage of second shooter' to be aired prove Lee Harvey Oswald did NOT act alone [View all]

Response to wildbilln864 (Reply #99)

Sun Nov 24, 2013, 02:18 PM

zappaman (20,602 posts)

100. He was right about George Bush.

The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder is a 2008 book by former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi. It argues that George W. Bush took the United States into the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses and should be tried for murder for the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq. The book sold over 130,000 copies within its first three months of release.

I agree with him.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

120 replies	Author	Time	Post
'long-hidden footage of second shooter' to be aired prove Lee Harvey Oswald did NOT act alone [View all]	Chrom	Nov 2013	OP
yup	zappaman	Nov 2013	#1
lol nt	BootinUp	Nov 2013	#2
Bwahahaha!	Brickbat	Nov 2013	#6
lol	treestar	Nov 2013	#13
Exactly my thoughts too.	In_The_Wind	Nov 2013	#22
LOL	DanTex	Nov 2013	#37
So apt! lol.	NutmegYankee	Nov 2013	#51
And for your next magical trick?	hobbit709	Nov 2013	#3
sure will be glad when these Kennedy CT threads dry-up . . .	DrDan	Nov 2013	#4
I'll give this as much credence as I give the birthers,	Ranchemp.	Nov 2013	#5
Makes sense.	Nye Bevan	Nov 2013	#7
If you can't trust "a principal in small film production company" to have an undoctored video,	arcane1	Nov 2013	#8
And here he is!	randome	Nov 2013	#9
(Yawn!)	DinahMoeHum	Nov 2013	#10
This should be good.	The Midway Rebel	Nov 2013	#11
Hoax	treestar	Nov 2013	#12
Not a hoax....	whistler162	Nov 2013	#34
If true, it might convince a few skeptics.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#14
I was praying for something like this last night, something to finally expose the undeniable truth	Chrom	Nov 2013	#15
It's a hoax,	Ranchemp.	Nov 2013	#16
Octafish hangs his hat on literally anything	BootinUp	Nov 2013	#17
!!!!!!	zappaman	Nov 2013	#19
So the new smear is I'm in it for the money?	Octafish	Nov 2013	#25
How is that a smear, when the guy himself says he wants to sell it to the highest bidder?	arcane1	Nov 2013	#30
This is just standard operating procedure.	zappaman	Nov 2013	#46
that will totally happen	arely staircase	Nov 2013	#76
Oh forgot to say	zappaman	Nov 2013	#78
You do realize the CIA can't conduct domestic investigations, yes?	Major Nikon	Nov 2013	#50
Don't worry. The law never stopped CIA.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#56
So you wouldn't be satisfied unless the CIA broke the law?	Major Nikon	Nov 2013	#62
"You do realize the CIA can't conduct domestic investigations" And you are positive that they	rhett o rick	Nov 2013	#93
I'm positive the expectation of them doing so is more than a bit misguided	Major Nikon	Nov 2013	#96
I have no problem with anyone that thinks Oswald acted alone. My problem is with those that want	rhett o rick	Nov 2013	#103
There is mocking, nut calling, and bullying on all sides in a forum.	BootinUp	Nov 2013	#104
Oh please. That's a sad rationalization. I wont deny that it's not 100% to 0%, but it	rhett o rick	Nov 2013	#106
I'm somewhat agnostic about the whole thing	Major Nikon	Nov 2013	#105
I agree that there are a lots of folks that like to throw shit against the wall.	rhett o rick	Nov 2013	#107
Try 50,000. link	BootinUp	Nov 2013	#113
3(a): Dulles had been fired by JFK, yet became one of 7 members of the Warren Commission.	snot	Nov 2013	#82
Dulles on WC was the ultimate conflict-of-interest.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#84
That's why I include my sources in my posts.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#23
Name one (1) popular conspiracy theory	BootinUp	Nov 2013	#27
Here you go, courtesy of Conspiracy Debunker John McAdams' website:	Octafish	Nov 2013	#41
I'm so surprised. Not. lol.	BootinUp	Nov 2013	#47
So, rather than being surprised by a known disinformationist, why not show where I'm wrong?	Octafish	Nov 2013	#48
Just leave the post unedited so everyone else can be as not surprised	BootinUp	Nov 2013	#49
Where have I edited a post so people would get the wrong impression about you?	Octafish	Nov 2013	#57
Lol	zappaman	Nov 2013	#61
Data-dumps give the impression of authority and distract people from simple, relevant points	greyl	Nov 2013	#31
A better term for it is "Gish gallop."	Archae	Nov 2013	#35
Yep, that right there. nt	greyl	Nov 2013	#36
+100	zappaman	Nov 2013	#38
But the blue links are so pretty,	Ranchemp.	Nov 2013	#39
Had the same thought here!! nt	eqfan592	Nov 2013	#77
How IS the Amazing Randi, greyl?	Octafish	Nov 2013	#42
Did I mention distracting people?	greyl	Nov 2013	#120
Did you know that the word "gullible" is not in the dictionary? Seriously. Look it up. n-t	Logical	Nov 2013	#18
Okay...you made me laugh 'til I had to go pee! DUzy!! nt	msanthrope	Nov 2013	#24
really?	backwoodsbob	Nov 2013	#54
I can't venture a guess as to its legitimacy until viewing it.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#58
wow	backwoodsbob	Nov 2013	#65
Yes, it does. It means to give an honest evaluation, one must first see the footage.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#66
we can all improve reading comprehension through practice	backwoodsbob	Nov 2013	#67
Yet you critique The Warren Commission Report and Bugliosi's book without reading them?	zappaman	Nov 2013	#74
No need to lie about me, zappaman. I read the Warren report.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#79
16, not counting the one you're afraid to read.	zappaman	Nov 2013	#80
Keep on lying.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#81
Uh huh...	zappaman	Nov 2013	#89
Maybe when I'm done reading more important books.	Octafish	Nov 2013	#94
Thank you!	zappaman	Nov 2013	#97
Are you afraid of being a quaint artifact of American history?	The Midway Rebel	Nov 2013	#91
How about the 2000 election? That wasn't a conspiracy, right?	Octafish	Nov 2013	#92
Now that the 5oth anniversary of the assassination has passed	zappaman	Nov 2013	#98
Wrong. Why spread what Allen Dulles wants you to say, zappaman?	Octafish	Nov 2013	#102
Bugliosi is such a joke!	wildbilln864	Nov 2013	#99
He was right about George Bush.	zappaman	Nov 2013	#100
yes he was right!	wildbilln864	Nov 2013	#101
That footage aired in February of 1992	pintobean	Nov 2013	#20
Wow, that is funny! But some CTs here will use it as proof. n-t	Logical	Nov 2013	#26
Is this the level to which JFK conspiracies have deteriorated?	Paladin	Nov 2013	#21
"Bowen is hoping to sell the footage to the highest bidder"	struggle4progress	Nov 2013	#28
People sell legitimate historical artifacts for the best price all the time.	avaistheone1	Nov 2013	#43
He says he footage was taken by a Houston news producer on November 22, 1963	arely staircase	Nov 2013	#29
Picky picky picky. News footage can easily pile up on the editor's desk, and it can take a few days	struggle4progress	Nov 2013	#114
well yeah there is that nt	arely staircase	Nov 2013	#116
Fifty years, however, does seem an excessive backlog	struggle4progress	Nov 2013	#117
but like you said	arely staircase	Nov 2013	#119
On the day...	bobclark86	Nov 2013	#118
Photo of the Grassy Knoll gunman!	Archae	Nov 2013	#32
This just in,	Ranchemp.	Nov 2013	#33
LOL n/t	lordsummerisle	Nov 2013	#69
Area Man Can Remember Exactly Where He Was, What He Was Doing When He Assassinated John F. Kennedy	duffyduff	Nov 2013	#40
FFS Hosts, do your duty...	SidDithers	Nov 2013	#44
In the 70's Mort Saul showed a video	Politicalboi	Nov 2013	#45
i have a shrunken alien head that i'll let go for ten bucks...honest	spanone	Nov 2013	#52
Great Jeebus!	JimboBillyBubbaBob	Nov 2013	#53
If the forum hosts are going to leave this, I'd like to hear why. The SOP violation seems obvious	stevenleser	Nov 2013	#55
there seems to have been an editorial decision	arely staircase	Nov 2013	#59
Hosts generally ignore the "no conspiracy theories" part of the SOP...	SidDithers	Nov 2013	#108
"Bowen decided the 50th anniversary of JFK’s death was a good time to bring it to market"	struggle4progress	Nov 2013	#60
The National Enquirer might pay $100....	HooptieWagon	Nov 2013	#63
It's Andy Kaufman wrestling a woman !	RagAss	Nov 2013	#64
Let's talk again AFTER it's been shown	JHB	Nov 2013	#68
Could this be a still frame from the film ?	RagAss	Nov 2013	#70
Proof that the 1 bullet theory is valid as Barney was only allowed to have 1 bullet.	Kaleva	Nov 2013	#75
I'm already convinced just from the article.	nyquil_man	Nov 2013	#71
almost certain to be BS	salo99	Nov 2013	#72
wecome to DU	gopiscrap	Nov 2013	#73
NO ONE here can know whether this footage is authentic or even helpful one way or the other,	snot	Nov 2013	#83
What took him so long?	polichick	Nov 2013	#85
That's what I thought	Rosa Luxemburg	Nov 2013	#87
Honestly, it might not be safe to come out now.	polichick	Nov 2013	#88
They had me at, "while no one has yet viewed the footage"	cthulu2016	Nov 2013	#86
There's one born every minute.	GoneOffShore	Nov 2013	#90
'You can see a guy in the bushes with a gun,' the source told The Wrap.	MADem	Nov 2013	#95
I have footage of the birth of Christ	Aerows	Nov 2013	#109
I welcome anything that could possibly bring closure to the case.	roamer65	Nov 2013	#110
Message auto-removed	Name removed	Nov 2013	#111
You never know...nope. Waiting to see the film. eom	Purveyor	Nov 2013	#112
Same here. I'll believe it when I see it. n/r	RebelOne	Nov 2013	#115

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.