General Discussion

zappaman

(20,606 posts)

100. He was right about George Bush.

Sun Nov 24, 2013, 02:18 PM

Nov 2013

The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder is a 2008 book by former prosecutor Vincent Bugliosi. It argues that George W. Bush took the United States into the invasion of Iraq under false pretenses and should be tried for murder for the deaths of American soldiers in Iraq. The book sold over 130,000 copies within its first three months of release.

I agree with him.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

120 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

'long-hidden footage of second shooter' to be aired prove Lee Harvey Oswald did NOT act alone [View all] Chrom Nov 2013 OP

yup zappaman Nov 2013 #1

lol nt BootinUp Nov 2013 #2

Bwahahaha! Brickbat Nov 2013 #6

lol treestar Nov 2013 #13

Exactly my thoughts too. In_The_Wind Nov 2013 #22

LOL DanTex Nov 2013 #37

So apt! lol. NutmegYankee Nov 2013 #51

And for your next magical trick? hobbit709 Nov 2013 #3

sure will be glad when these Kennedy CT threads dry-up . . . DrDan Nov 2013 #4

I'll give this as much credence as I give the birthers, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #5

Makes sense. Nye Bevan Nov 2013 #7

If you can't trust "a principal in small film production company" to have an undoctored video, arcane1 Nov 2013 #8

And here he is! randome Nov 2013 #9

(Yawn!) DinahMoeHum Nov 2013 #10

This should be good. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #11

Hoax treestar Nov 2013 #12

Not a hoax.... whistler162 Nov 2013 #34

If true, it might convince a few skeptics. Octafish Nov 2013 #14

I was praying for something like this last night, something to finally expose the undeniable truth Chrom Nov 2013 #15

It's a hoax, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #16

Octafish hangs his hat on literally anything BootinUp Nov 2013 #17

!!!!!! zappaman Nov 2013 #19

So the new smear is I'm in it for the money? Octafish Nov 2013 #25

How is that a smear, when the guy himself says he wants to sell it to the highest bidder? arcane1 Nov 2013 #30

This is just standard operating procedure. zappaman Nov 2013 #46

that will totally happen arely staircase Nov 2013 #76

Oh forgot to say zappaman Nov 2013 #78

You do realize the CIA can't conduct domestic investigations, yes? Major Nikon Nov 2013 #50

Don't worry. The law never stopped CIA. Octafish Nov 2013 #56

So you wouldn't be satisfied unless the CIA broke the law? Major Nikon Nov 2013 #62

"You do realize the CIA can't conduct domestic investigations" And you are positive that they rhett o rick Nov 2013 #93

I'm positive the expectation of them doing so is more than a bit misguided Major Nikon Nov 2013 #96

I have no problem with anyone that thinks Oswald acted alone. My problem is with those that want rhett o rick Nov 2013 #103

There is mocking, nut calling, and bullying on all sides in a forum. BootinUp Nov 2013 #104

Oh please. That's a sad rationalization. I wont deny that it's not 100% to 0%, but it rhett o rick Nov 2013 #106

I'm somewhat agnostic about the whole thing Major Nikon Nov 2013 #105

I agree that there are a lots of folks that like to throw shit against the wall. rhett o rick Nov 2013 #107

Try 50,000. link BootinUp Nov 2013 #113

3(a): Dulles had been fired by JFK, yet became one of 7 members of the Warren Commission. snot Nov 2013 #82

Dulles on WC was the ultimate conflict-of-interest. Octafish Nov 2013 #84

That's why I include my sources in my posts. Octafish Nov 2013 #23

Name one (1) popular conspiracy theory BootinUp Nov 2013 #27

Here you go, courtesy of Conspiracy Debunker John McAdams' website: Octafish Nov 2013 #41

I'm so surprised. Not. lol. BootinUp Nov 2013 #47

So, rather than being surprised by a known disinformationist, why not show where I'm wrong? Octafish Nov 2013 #48

Just leave the post unedited so everyone else can be as not surprised BootinUp Nov 2013 #49

Where have I edited a post so people would get the wrong impression about you? Octafish Nov 2013 #57

Lol zappaman Nov 2013 #61

Data-dumps give the impression of authority and distract people from simple, relevant points greyl Nov 2013 #31

A better term for it is "Gish gallop." Archae Nov 2013 #35

Yep, that right there. nt greyl Nov 2013 #36

+100 zappaman Nov 2013 #38

But the blue links are so pretty, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #39

Had the same thought here!! nt eqfan592 Nov 2013 #77

How IS the Amazing Randi, greyl? Octafish Nov 2013 #42

Did I mention distracting people? greyl Nov 2013 #120

Did you know that the word "gullible" is not in the dictionary? Seriously. Look it up. n-t Logical Nov 2013 #18

Okay...you made me laugh 'til I had to go pee! DUzy!! nt msanthrope Nov 2013 #24

really? backwoodsbob Nov 2013 #54

I can't venture a guess as to its legitimacy until viewing it. Octafish Nov 2013 #58

wow backwoodsbob Nov 2013 #65

Yes, it does. It means to give an honest evaluation, one must first see the footage. Octafish Nov 2013 #66

we can all improve reading comprehension through practice backwoodsbob Nov 2013 #67

Yet you critique The Warren Commission Report and Bugliosi's book without reading them? zappaman Nov 2013 #74

No need to lie about me, zappaman. I read the Warren report. Octafish Nov 2013 #79

16, not counting the one you're afraid to read. zappaman Nov 2013 #80

Keep on lying. Octafish Nov 2013 #81

Uh huh... zappaman Nov 2013 #89

Maybe when I'm done reading more important books. Octafish Nov 2013 #94

Thank you! zappaman Nov 2013 #97

Are you afraid of being a quaint artifact of American history? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #91

How about the 2000 election? That wasn't a conspiracy, right? Octafish Nov 2013 #92

Now that the 5oth anniversary of the assassination has passed zappaman Nov 2013 #98

Wrong. Why spread what Allen Dulles wants you to say, zappaman? Octafish Nov 2013 #102

Bugliosi is such a joke! wildbilln864 Nov 2013 #99

He was right about George Bush. zappaman Nov 2013 #100

yes he was right! wildbilln864 Nov 2013 #101

That footage aired in February of 1992 pintobean Nov 2013 #20

Wow, that is funny! But some CTs here will use it as proof. n-t Logical Nov 2013 #26

Is this the level to which JFK conspiracies have deteriorated? Paladin Nov 2013 #21

"Bowen is hoping to sell the footage to the highest bidder" struggle4progress Nov 2013 #28

People sell legitimate historical artifacts for the best price all the time. avaistheone1 Nov 2013 #43

He says he footage was taken by a Houston news producer on November 22, 1963 arely staircase Nov 2013 #29

Picky picky picky. News footage can easily pile up on the editor's desk, and it can take a few days struggle4progress Nov 2013 #114

well yeah there is that nt arely staircase Nov 2013 #116

Fifty years, however, does seem an excessive backlog struggle4progress Nov 2013 #117

but like you said arely staircase Nov 2013 #119

On the day... bobclark86 Nov 2013 #118

Photo of the Grassy Knoll gunman! Archae Nov 2013 #32

This just in, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #33

LOL n/t lordsummerisle Nov 2013 #69

Area Man Can Remember Exactly Where He Was, What He Was Doing When He Assassinated John F. Kennedy duffyduff Nov 2013 #40

FFS Hosts, do your duty... SidDithers Nov 2013 #44

In the 70's Mort Saul showed a video Politicalboi Nov 2013 #45

i have a shrunken alien head that i'll let go for ten bucks...honest spanone Nov 2013 #52

Great Jeebus! JimboBillyBubbaBob Nov 2013 #53

If the forum hosts are going to leave this, I'd like to hear why. The SOP violation seems obvious stevenleser Nov 2013 #55

there seems to have been an editorial decision arely staircase Nov 2013 #59

Hosts generally ignore the "no conspiracy theories" part of the SOP... SidDithers Nov 2013 #108

"Bowen decided the 50th anniversary of JFK’s death was a good time to bring it to market" struggle4progress Nov 2013 #60

The National Enquirer might pay $100.... HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #63

It's Andy Kaufman wrestling a woman ! RagAss Nov 2013 #64

Let's talk again AFTER it's been shown JHB Nov 2013 #68

Could this be a still frame from the film ? RagAss Nov 2013 #70

Proof that the 1 bullet theory is valid as Barney was only allowed to have 1 bullet. Kaleva Nov 2013 #75

I'm already convinced just from the article. nyquil_man Nov 2013 #71

almost certain to be BS salo99 Nov 2013 #72

wecome to DU gopiscrap Nov 2013 #73

NO ONE here can know whether this footage is authentic or even helpful one way or the other, snot Nov 2013 #83

What took him so long? polichick Nov 2013 #85

That's what I thought Rosa Luxemburg Nov 2013 #87

Honestly, it might not be safe to come out now. polichick Nov 2013 #88

They had me at, "while no one has yet viewed the footage" cthulu2016 Nov 2013 #86

There's one born every minute. GoneOffShore Nov 2013 #90

'You can see a guy in the bushes with a gun,' the source told The Wrap. MADem Nov 2013 #95

I have footage of the birth of Christ Aerows Nov 2013 #109

I welcome anything that could possibly bring closure to the case. roamer65 Nov 2013 #110

Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #111

You never know...nope. Waiting to see the film. eom Purveyor Nov 2013 #112

Same here. I'll believe it when I see it. n/r RebelOne Nov 2013 #115