Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

The Midway Rebel

(2,191 posts)

1. Kicking for the Sunday readers. nt

Reply to The Midway Rebel (Original post)

Sun Nov 24, 2013, 02:14 PM

Nov 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The JFK Assassination and American Conspiracy Culture by Jonathan Earle [View all] The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 OP

Kicking for the Sunday readers. nt The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #1

Here's the problem RobertEarl Nov 2013 #2

It's got nothing to do with trusting authority. DanTex Nov 2013 #3

Has everything to do with trust RobertEarl Nov 2013 #5

Let's see Bush lied, Reagan lied, and therefore our government lied re JFK. duffyduff Nov 2013 #6

What the Bushes or Reagan or Nixon said has nothing to do with JFK's assassination. DanTex Nov 2013 #8

Wow RobertEarl Nov 2013 #10

As usual, you ignore the part about the actual evidence. DanTex Nov 2013 #11

And your first sentence sums up yours. "Wow." The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #12

Question away. Who is stopping you? The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #4

What does "ecumenical" mean to you? RobertEarl Nov 2013 #7

This thread isn't really about me. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #9

Bush was also CIA head RobertEarl Nov 2013 #13

Has jack shit to do with the OP and proves nothing. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #14

Wow, that's fascinating! DanTex Nov 2013 #15

"Conspiracy culture"? IMO, that's a well-fitting shoe. WinkyDink Nov 2013 #16

Those are good examples of revealed conspiracies. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #17

Simply because there are those who refuse to accept strong circumstantial evidence does not WinkyDink Nov 2013 #18

Comparing JFK conspiracies to the Simpson murder is truly preposterous. DanTex Nov 2013 #19

Much easier to prove Oswald not alone than that he was KurtNYC Nov 2013 #20

... DanTex Nov 2013 #24

Thanks for a factual post. duffyduff Nov 2013 #26

Your post confirms many of the facts I cite KurtNYC Nov 2013 #28

Huh? What facts would those be? DanTex Nov 2013 #33

B.S. It's a fact he acted alone. duffyduff Nov 2013 #25

What ''conspiracy-relishing coverage of the 50th anniversary of the JFK assassination''? Octafish Nov 2013 #21

Yes, Dr. Earle is "coming from" the profession of history. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #22

No, he's ''coming from'' the profession of disinformationist. Octafish Nov 2013 #23

Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. DanTex Nov 2013 #27

Sigh. You keep repeating the same lies. Ichingcarpenter Nov 2013 #29

LOL. "your story is full of holes" DanTex Nov 2013 #30

So what? Oswald in Mexico City was no misidentification. Octafish Nov 2013 #32

That's all pure speculation. DanTex Nov 2013 #35

Thanks for knocking down this strawman... MinM Nov 2013 #34

Well, he's a tenured professor at a state university and teaches a course in conspiracy theory. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #37

The two biggest contribution to ongoing conspiracy theories is ... Vox Moi Nov 2013 #31

It is clear you did not read the thread. The Midway Rebel Nov 2013 #36