Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

calimary

(87,004 posts)
135. I like that term you used here, Hoyt. "Compensators."
Fri Nov 15, 2013, 04:46 PM
Nov 2013

Seems to me that it sums things up quite well for some of the people involved.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

nO. Scuba Nov 2013 #1
Still look like losers no matter what angle. MythosMaster Nov 2013 #2
Welcome to DU, MythosMaster! calimary Nov 2013 #131
Thank you! MythosMaster Nov 2013 #137
Wow abelenkpe Nov 2013 #3
yes, because FLAGS elehhhhna Nov 2013 #11
+1 n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #46
Seriously??? Daemonaquila Nov 2013 #109
no Skittles Nov 2013 #4
Lemme think about that... derby378 Nov 2013 #5
!!!! Brigid Nov 2013 #6
(uh, no, they don't wipe their butts....period.) lastlib Nov 2013 #117
Of course it does. The flag solves everything.... RagAss Nov 2013 #7
You can put caviar on top of a Shit Sandwich Berlum Nov 2013 #8
But they're all smiling now! That makes it better! KansDem Nov 2013 #9
Nope. Paladin Nov 2013 #10
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #12
Wow, jail for life for conducting a legal activity... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #13
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #15
America is most certainly not Japan... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Nov 2013 #61
Do you really live in fear of that? Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #76
So how long before they do this at Abortion Clinics....and if so do you approve of that too? VanillaRhapsody Nov 2013 #78
I think the worry is more about concern for others safety meanit Nov 2013 #80
There is a difference between concern... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #86
It's not just "Post Offices" anymore. meanit Nov 2013 #87
I do understand that emotionally... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #91
Comparing a swarm of bees to someone premeditatedly walking into meanit Nov 2013 #92
Emotionally perhaps... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #93
Something can be done about the nut with the arsenal. meanit Nov 2013 #94
If you actually "live in fear" of that... Lizzie Poppet Nov 2013 #88
hey, if they were African-Americans holding guns outside that restaurant napkinz Nov 2013 #17
That reminds me of something... Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #18
Right wing bigots like to post that photo for some reason. Hoyt Nov 2013 #36
I think Decaffeinated's full name is "Decaffeinated TEA" napkinz Nov 2013 #44
No joke. I think he stumbled upon the wrong Web site. Hoyt Nov 2013 #48
326 posts ... I doubt he/she will reach 350 napkinz Nov 2013 #49
Ta Dah! Decaffeinated Nov 2013 #115
LOL. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #119
circa 1965? Don't you have anything more recent? notadmblnd Nov 2013 #52
Yeah, that didn't work out well for the Black Panthers. SolutionisSolidarity Nov 2013 #69
and what happened to the Black Panthers? noiretextatique Nov 2013 #104
And it Worked Out Great for Fred Hampton, right? TheSarcastinator Nov 2013 #107
And St. Ronnie pissed himself getting the Mulford Act passed to specifically take away their Ikonoklast Nov 2013 #111
What if the lunch meeting was 4 Packers fans, and a boatload of armed Bears fans showed up outside riderinthestorm Nov 2013 #21
yep! napkinz Nov 2013 #23
nope, they are assholes from any angle. TeamPooka Nov 2013 #14
Even the photo I saw that was taken from the side MNBrewer Nov 2013 #16
It shows how dishonest pushing the other pic was. Skip Intro Nov 2013 #19
It was not dishonest kcr Nov 2013 #22
It was claimed they were waiting in ambush, threatening, Skip Intro Nov 2013 #28
They posed for a picture kcr Nov 2013 #29
Oh, well in that case Skip Intro Nov 2013 #33
Again, hardly. kcr Nov 2013 #42
Are you denying the photo is of a bunch of right wing gun humpers there to intimidat Mothers group? Hoyt Nov 2013 #47
Yes, the other photo was meant to convey a false reality. Skip Intro Nov 2013 #53
How was it a false reality? kcr Nov 2013 #55
Other pic conveyed pending ambush to many. Skip Intro Nov 2013 #62
Making a statement. That's a clear distinction only in your head kcr Nov 2013 #64
If they "posed for this picture"...outside an abortion clinic... VanillaRhapsody Nov 2013 #81
So they meet there often. Or did they arrive with their friggin compensators when they heard Hoyt Nov 2013 #58
I like that term you used here, Hoyt. "Compensators." calimary Nov 2013 #135
Looks like somebody got a gunz sadz over the other picture! Rex Nov 2013 #35
It's the only argument left the gun nut shitheads: waaah! the other picture was PROPAGANDA alcibiades_mystery Nov 2013 #82
There's a thread going on in DU's own gungeon just like that, believe it or not Electric Monk Nov 2013 #83
I don't read, think about, or otherwise engage gun nut shitheads alcibiades_mystery Nov 2013 #84
Good point. calimary Nov 2013 #134
You make a statement with words ... surrealAmerican Nov 2013 #24
It is called grasping at straws...pathetic attempt really. Rex Nov 2013 #39
Pray tell, exactly what "statement" were they there to make? Tommy_Carcetti Nov 2013 #79
Were those poor motherfuckers shown from a poor angle? Awww, what a shame DisgustipatedinCA Nov 2013 #85
So nice to know you approve of Fox News. Daemonaquila Nov 2013 #110
Me despising inbred fuckfaces with guns has nothing to do with your Fox News fetish DisgustipatedinCA Nov 2013 #113
Yep. Stupid and cowardly is stupid and cowardly... 99Forever Nov 2013 #20
Gun nut shitheads acting like gun nut shitheads alcibiades_mystery Nov 2013 #25
They are still jerks. But how many people did they shoot? We know everyone with a gun shoots people The Straight Story Nov 2013 #26
still jerks but it Niceguy1 Nov 2013 #66
Fuck no!!! gopiscrap Nov 2013 #30
They look like ignorant, bigoted, gun humpers from that angle too. Hoyt Nov 2013 #31
They look like mentally unstable people imo. Rex Nov 2013 #32
Oh, and how do mentally unstable people look? Skip Intro Nov 2013 #34
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #37
I'm not the one having a Frist moment... Skip Intro Nov 2013 #50
DO you still love creekdog? Rex Nov 2013 #51
You know, some advocate for the mentally ill might alert Skip Intro Nov 2013 #67
Flag fixes everything. Bolo Boffin Nov 2013 #38
Yes, without a doubt. Glassunion Nov 2013 #40
If you put a murderer in front of an American flag, he/she will still be a murderer. Vashta Nerada Nov 2013 #41
looks like some serious paranoia....in both pictures. spanone Nov 2013 #43
K&R for pissing off all the RIGHT people! Rex Nov 2013 #45
Bu...but the mean ladies were in the restaurant talking mean about them, meanies!!!! ProudToBeBlueInRhody Nov 2013 #54
That they had to show up in larger numbers and with their guns proves beyond any doubt Rex Nov 2013 #57
Texas Statute rdharma Nov 2013 #56
Hell, even the Zimmerman jury could apply that straightforward language correctly. Hoyt Nov 2013 #59
+1 uponit7771 Nov 2013 #123
Did you notice that two of those "experts" would blow their comrades heads off bluestate10 Nov 2013 #60
Yes, in fact. I noticed it immediately. Chan790 Nov 2013 #75
I Hate Them otohara Nov 2013 #63
what? Whaddya think? CTyankee Nov 2013 #65
Cowards need vindicating? Lint Head Nov 2013 #68
It certainly does tell a different story than the first image. nt Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #70
Just Now on Chris Hayes otohara Nov 2013 #73
No. They still look like bullies. tenderfoot Nov 2013 #71
no arely staircase Nov 2013 #72
a picture of psychos with weaponry is not flattering regardless of how it is framed etherealtruth Nov 2013 #74
Psychos? Not likely. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #95
I think the reasons these folks went to that restaurant armed is enough to prove intimidation, and Hoyt Nov 2013 #96
Well Hoyt, Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #99
They did not investigate. A few of the psychos are probably related to the chief and his sister. Hoyt Nov 2013 #100
They did investigate and monitored the group Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #103
Tiari is a PR person, not an investigator or DA. Hoyt Nov 2013 #106
What would they need to investigate? oldhippie Nov 2013 #105
you are telling me that PD NOT acting or arresting is proof of legal activity? Sheepshank Nov 2013 #118
I'm not telling you anything, the Arlington Police are. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #120
they are telling me they are also admitted gun nut sympathizers at worst Sheepshank Nov 2013 #122
So if the guy wearing the ball hat on the right (kneeling) walked into the supermarket AlinPA Nov 2013 #102
Brandishing? etherealtruth Nov 2013 #108
Yes it's against the law... especially if shown in a way to alarm uponit7771 Nov 2013 #124
You'll have to take it up with the Arlington Police Dept. Ranchemp. Nov 2013 #125
I was expecting that they were actually holding brooms as part of some charitable litter clean up Tommy_Carcetti Nov 2013 #77
Yes and no. Lizzie Poppet Nov 2013 #89
No! nt arthritisR_US Nov 2013 #90
No, of course not. Fuck 'em. Aristus Nov 2013 #97
Nope! n/t zappaman Nov 2013 #98
I don't quite understand the question. Jenoch Nov 2013 #101
Yeah, it was mere coincidence that they had a photo shoot near that meeting. Gormy Cuss Nov 2013 #112
Who photoshopped out all the tea party flags and t-shirts? jmowreader Nov 2013 #114
NO Sheepshank Nov 2013 #116
that looks like a group of people who would crap their pants... LynneSin Nov 2013 #121
Yup. peace13 Nov 2013 #129
The other photo was a bit misleading LittleBlue Nov 2013 #126
Lots of kids died at Jonestown. peace13 Nov 2013 #132
If I were one of those moms inside, and I saw what was "making a statement" outside, calimary Nov 2013 #133
It seems pretty obvious to me LittleBlue Nov 2013 #136
I suppose it's in the eye of the beholder. calimary Nov 2013 #138
Juanita Jean thinks that this is the wee winkie group Gothmog Nov 2013 #127
That picture makes me physically ill. peace13 Nov 2013 #128
NO! Seriously? It just underscores the attempted intimidation tactic. calimary Nov 2013 #130
Context is everything but Packerowner740 Nov 2013 #139
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does This Photo Vindicate...»Reply #135