HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Question: How Many Books ... » Reply #31

Response to TreasonousBastard (Reply #20)

Mon Nov 11, 2013, 03:24 AM

31. Except the rifle was found to be quite accurate when test-fired.

This is yet another case of conspiracy authors just making things up.


Mr. EISENBERG. Our next witness will be Mr. Simmons.
Mr. EISENBERG. Can you give us your position, Mr. Simmons?
Mr. SIMMONS. I am the Chief of the Infantry Weapons Evaluation Branch of the Ballistics Research Laboratory of the Department of the Army.
Mr. EISENBERG. Mr. Simmons, did you conduct a test from a machine rest, a test of round-to- round dispersion of this weapon, or have such tests conducted?
Mr. SIMMONS. May I check the serial number?
Mr. EISENBERG. I should ask first if you are familiar with this weapon.
I have handed the witness Commission Exhibit 139.
Mr. SIMMONS. Yes. We fired this weapon from a machine rest for round-to-round dispersion. We fired exactly 20 rounds in this test, and the dispersion which we measured is of conventional magnitude, about the same that we get with our present military rifles, and the standard deviation of dispersion is .29 mil.

Mr. EISENBERG. That is a fraction of a degree?
Mr. SIMMONS. A mil is an angular measurement. There are 17.7 mils to a degree.
Mr. EISENBERG. Do I understand your testimony to be that this rifle is as accurate as the current American military rifles?
Mr. SIMMONS. Yes. As far as we can determine from bench-rest firing.
Mr. EISENBERG. Would you consider that to be a high degree of accuracy?
Mr. SIMMONS. Yes, the weapon is quite accurate. For most small arms, we discover that the round- to-round dispersion is of the order of three-tenths of a mil. We have run into some unusual ones, however, which give us higher values, but very few which give us smaller values, except in selected lots of ammunition.

Mr. McCLOY. You are talking about the present military rifle--will you designate it?
Mr. SIMMONS. The M-14.
Mr. McCLOY. Is it as accurate as the Springfield 1906 ammunition?
Mr. SIMMONS. I am not familiar with the difference between the M-14 in its accuracy and the 1906 Springfield. These are very similar in their dispersion.
Mr. McCLOY. At a hundred yards, what does that amount to? What is the dispersion?
Mr. SIMMONS. Well, at a hundred yards, one mil is 3.6 inches, and 0.3 of that is a little more than an inch.


Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 46 replies Author Time Post
WillyT Nov 2013 OP
RagAss Nov 2013 #1
libdem4life Nov 2013 #2
JimboBillyBubbaBob Nov 2013 #3
Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #4
stopbush Nov 2013 #9
sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #5
Fumesucker Nov 2013 #24
Logical Nov 2013 #6
PETRUS Nov 2013 #7
Archae Nov 2013 #8
meanit Nov 2013 #10
WillyT Nov 2013 #11
defacto7 Nov 2013 #12
WillyT Nov 2013 #13
defacto7 Nov 2013 #15
Blue_In_AK Nov 2013 #21
defacto7 Nov 2013 #30
Gravitycollapse Nov 2013 #36
exboyfil Nov 2013 #14
nyquil_man Nov 2013 #16
krawhitham Nov 2013 #17
MinM Nov 2013 #38
grasswire Nov 2013 #18
WillyT Nov 2013 #19
MinM Nov 2013 #44
MinM Nov 2013 #45
TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #20
WillyT Nov 2013 #23
LineLineReply Except the rifle was found to be quite accurate when test-fired.
Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #31
TreasonousBastard Nov 2013 #32
Spider Jerusalem Nov 2013 #34
Iggo Nov 2013 #22
WillyT Nov 2013 #25
Iggo Nov 2013 #26
Marrah_G Nov 2013 #27
Samantha Nov 2013 #28
gopiscrap Nov 2013 #29
ZombieHorde Nov 2013 #33
oswaldactedalone Nov 2013 #35
HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #37
Orrex Nov 2013 #39
MinM Nov 2013 #40
mulsh Nov 2013 #41
Coyotl Nov 2013 #42
rock Nov 2013 #43
ScreamingMeemie Nov 2013 #46
Please login to view edit histories.