General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: PRESS RELEASE: Racketeering Romney Lawsuit Becomes Official November 6th [View all]polynomial
(750 posts)This is great, especially to be in the follow up tracking a law suit against a former presidential candidate. A different level than John Edwards being close to the top layer but that upper law area to the Hoi polloi to the riff raff citizen, or the ignorant like me is tabooed and mystified by the media, loaded with free speech money, always confuse by the famous phrase journalist use that begs the question. Or with that said is my favorite.
The game is played in what I call a pseudo social legal immunity far from being fair. The actions are like a Constitutional polo game, with sublime arrogance judges invoke legal ease to curtail rights or privileges. From my view this legal stuff is hard to get through because more than we know in the legal community it is the shuffle board of soft money that wrench the Constitution.
From my view, and I know nothing about legal mechanics however at this time in my life drawn to it. This Romney does appear to be a hardened flim flamer of the worst science called greed. Romney very obtuse in empathy for the average citizen yet knows the bell pull to free speech money the high rollers play shuffle board with.
What really jumped out at me
Whereas plaintiff alleges the parties named in this Complaint are culpable persons corrupting interstate commerce via patterns of racketeering.
That part of the community of legal people that knows enough to tap the system at a distance but get around the monopoly Go plate to collect a stay out of jail card. Free speech money really talks.
Another phrase jumps out to me:
Congress provided a solution whereby citizens can become Private Attorney Generals if such need should arise.
Certainly would like to know what congress made that ruling. This system and its corruption make me so angered that if I had the money my time would be spent in a perpetual legal chase. I might have that chance. I just signed a contract with a legal firm to file a whistle blower complaint to the government but do not have the money that might be needed.