General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why the arguments of Obama's defenders leave many cold. [View all]Wait Wut
(8,492 posts)I was feeling pretty good about DU3, until this:
"They are morally bankrupt and contemptible regarding the direction of the country over the long term."
Guess what? I'm one of those defenders. How dare you judge me, others here and people I care for and love as morally bankrupt and contemptible? Why this piece of trash wasn't voted out is what leaves me cold. I'm shocked at some of the names I saw that actually recced this garbage. People I didn't always agree with, but respected, nonetheless.
You do realize it's possible to have criticisms of our President with out calling his supporters, which includes many of your FELLOW DUers, names. You could very well have made a good argument in the rest of your post, but those last two paragraphs negated any shred of respect I had for what you had to say.
Good luck. Trust me, that's not what I would like to say to you. I believe anyone that feels they can judge someone as morally bankrupt needs to clean off their mirror. It's obviously covered in filth. But, I guess since it's apparently okay with the jurors to call us morally bankrupt, etc., then it would be okay for me to call our Presiden't critics spoiled, petulant children. It would be okay, but I won't do it. There are still some of his critics that I do respect. So, while you may believe that I am contemptible, I'm also an adult.