General Discussion

unionworks

(3,574 posts)

19. BULLSHIT

Mon Mar 5, 2012, 06:46 PM

Mar 2012

The bill makes it a felony to assemble in an area under secret service protection. RAHM SAID HE WOULD PLACE JURISDICTION OF SECURITY FOR G8 UNDER SECRET SERVICE. ONCE DONE, ALL DEMONSTRATIONS ARE ILLEGAL. Spare us the blue dog bullshit.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

42 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

HB347 is a disturbing assault on the first amendment [View all] OKDem08 Mar 2012 OP

specifically aimed square unionworks Mar 2012 #1

+1 Le Taz Hot Mar 2012 #4

Funny it didn't come up when Occupy was having its rallies or any other rallies onenote Mar 2012 #8

you are certainly living up to your handle. ~nt 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #16

well, if there weren't so many folks on DU intent on perpetuating false facts about this bill, onenote Mar 2012 #18

see reply 19 n/t unionworks Mar 2012 #20

There's always the Internet Lawlbringer Mar 2012 #2

Ah ProSense Mar 2012 #3

see reply 19 n/t unionworks Mar 2012 #21

Fearmongering? Perhaps, but why this bill? Why now? Scuba Mar 2012 #5

It was proposed a year ago. Its not a major bill or a high priority. onenote Mar 2012 #7

Thank you. Scuba Mar 2012 #12

Classic line of bs: "Oh, it's just housekeeping. Not to worry. Nothing to see here." ~nt 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #35

Debunked a bunch of times already onenote Mar 2012 #6

Threads like this make the case for the return of unrec....nt SidDithers Mar 2012 #9

Exactly. There are also 3 variations of this post on DU at the moment. FSogol Mar 2012 #17

see reply 19 n/t unionworks Mar 2012 #22

3? More like 8 or 9. randome Mar 2012 #39

Yup, "Outrages" attempting to split the left just keep going, and going, and going.... FSogol Mar 2012 #42

I note that the article at the link does not discuss MineralMan Mar 2012 #10

see reply 19 n/t unionworks Mar 2012 #24

Only a few Republicans opposed it -- no Democrats. Courtesy Flush Mar 2012 #11

Why wouldn't Obama sign it? Does he hate the Vice President? onenote Mar 2012 #13

The Bill is already law 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #15

Oh come on ... you are just being hysterical and paranoid 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #14

never get a blueddog unionworks Mar 2012 #23

Suspiciously timed? onenote Mar 2012 #27

Thanks for the information. This is helpful to know. 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #29

For the 99th time: the only intent of this bill is to extend existing law to the WH and VP residence onenote Mar 2012 #31

The fact that we were already screwed 10 times over, before this bill added even more repressive 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #33

so you are opposed to making it unlawful to enter the WH and VP's residence without authorization onenote Mar 2012 #34

Ring!! Ring!!! This pretty much sums up my concerns. 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #36

FAIL onenote Mar 2012 #37

Your utter lack of concern about HR 347 is duly noted 99th_Monkey Mar 2012 #38

And your lack of interest in the facts and fact-based arguments is also duly noted onenote Mar 2012 #40

BULLSHIT unionworks Mar 2012 #19

This bill restates existing law in that regard. onenote Mar 2012 #26

gonna break my plastic scooper unionworks Mar 2012 #28

So you have no response to the fact that this is what the law has been for years onenote Mar 2012 #30

you sure got that right unionworks Mar 2012 #32

K&R Sounds like those in congress are passing unconstitutional bills? midnight Mar 2012 #25

There's a new assault on us every day. nt woo me with science Mar 2012 #41