Really? (Reply #2) - Democratic Underground

In the discussion thread: No Country Should be Allowed to Use Chemical Weapons Against Its Citizens [View all]

Response to AnotherMcIntosh (Original post)

Sat Aug 31, 2013, 12:52 PM

Mr_Teg (47 posts)

2. Really?

You would prefer to remove non-lethal options such as pepper spray or OC gas thus shortening the steps needed to go to lethal?

Taking those options out doesn't mean that force won't be used. It just means a different kind.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

14 replies	Author	Time	Post
No Country Should be Allowed to Use Chemical Weapons Against Its Citizens [View all]	AnotherMcIntosh	Aug 2013	OP
Except the U.S. because we're exceptional.	polichick	Aug 2013	#1
Really?	Mr_Teg	Aug 2013	#2
I suggest you go first for the implanted "non lethal" hostility control chip.	mick063	Aug 2013	#4
Or Deadly Guns	otohara	Aug 2013	#3
Cops have been "shooting each other"? (1) Important if true.	AnotherMcIntosh	Aug 2013	#9
No Problem	otohara	Aug 2013	#11
If those had been teabaggers we'd have laughed.	ileus	Aug 2013	#5
Nope	Harmony Blue	Aug 2013	#6
I wouldn't.	TheBlackAdder	Aug 2013	#8
Speak for yourself.	polichick	Aug 2013	#12
Also lethal injections...	dkf	Aug 2013	#7
The US, knowing asbestos and radiation were dangerous from the early days... allowed it.	TheBlackAdder	Aug 2013	#10
You Assume that the Government and the Media are telling you the Truth about Syria?	AZ Progressive	Aug 2013	#13
If you think that is my assumption, you have me confused with someone else.	AnotherMcIntosh	Aug 2013	#14

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.