Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So what is your red line? If Iran used a nuke and killed 1 million of it's own people [View all]MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)34. You're evading the question yourself
Why should anyone take the time to answer your question when you won't even answer it?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
156 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So what is your red line? If Iran used a nuke and killed 1 million of it's own people [View all]
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
OP
since you want to be so gung ho maybe you should quit fighting pretzels and sign up for real war.
hobbit709
Aug 2013
#1
But you failed to answer that posters very good quesitions. No genuine thanks to you for evasive
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#59
It's a good question. If you are willing to promote killing are your willing
Luminous Animal
Sep 2013
#124
So you are saying an isolated nuclear event in one city would wipe out the whole country?
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#8
I remember when Hillary said that if Iran nuked another country we'd obliterate them
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#61
Do you need the address to a local Military/Industrial complex citizen intake/freedom center?
Safetykitten
Aug 2013
#6
Regardless of blame, what action should be taken if a country were to nuke it's own citizens?
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#15
Go to war with a visibly insane regime that has nuclear weapons, apparently.
dairydog91
Aug 2013
#20
One would think that rational people would be less eager to go to war with a country that has nukes.
JVS
Aug 2013
#102
The question was directed at you. Thanks for evading it with a question
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#21
Ok Einstein. Because I 've already gone on record about my belief re: Syria and chem weapons
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#42
I think the U.S. And allies should use significant conventional force to take out the Iranian leader
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#54
I think the US should work with the UN Security Council to determine what should be done
MNBrewer
Aug 2013
#60
I might sound a bit like a fringe Democrat for saying this but I don't blame President Clinton for
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2013
#26
The bipartisan 9/11 Commission directed some of the blame Clinton's way and obviously
Pretzel_Warrior
Aug 2013
#30
I supported President Clinton for taking action in Bosnia and Herzegovina conflict and in Kosovo
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2013
#49
And what would YOU do if Barack Obama married Bashar Assad? ANSWER THE QUESTION!
dairydog91
Aug 2013
#53
What if my cat crapped anti-matter and caused Wyoming to sink into a blackhole?
NuclearDem
Aug 2013
#108
In a case like that the entire world would be stunned and in agreement on what to do.
DCBob
Aug 2013
#37
Should a debate on red lines be hidden under the spector of speculative mushroom clouds?
HereSince1628
Aug 2013
#44
bwahahah. the emptiest, most ridiculous, manipulative, lame speculation on DU EVER.
cali
Aug 2013
#50
My red line is when there is a groundswell of international consensus
Waiting For Everyman
Aug 2013
#51
About a million were killed during the Chinese Cultural Revolution and we did nothing.
FarCenter
Aug 2013
#63
This thread prompted me to look at the threads from when Hillary said we'd obliterate Iran if
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#64
Perhaps if an intelligent plan was put forth, our opposition might change.
Savannahmann
Aug 2013
#73
blaming President Clinton's "weakness" for 9/11 is pretty far out to find on a Democratic forum
Douglas Carpenter
Aug 2013
#82
The Cole was attacked when Clinton had less than 3 months left in office....
Bluenorthwest
Aug 2013
#78
Here is an excerpt from an interview with President Obama that references that question
oberliner
Sep 2013
#132
Central Africa's still "shielded" by the Mogadishu Line the P5 drew in the 90s, unfortunately. (nt)
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#148
Rather than killing them, how about imprisoning them? Would that call for a military response?
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#103
It's become entirely clear from NK and Pakistan that we won't bother nuke-capable nations. /nt
dorkulon
Aug 2013
#110
Fuckin' obvious: You NUKE 'em. They've already shown a willingness to nuke their OWN country.
cherokeeprogressive
Aug 2013
#112
It's the military industrial complex. THEY. DO. NOT. GIVE. A. FUCK. ABOUT. THE. PEOPLE.
Initech
Aug 2013
#115
As others have pointed out, we wouldn't give a shit about civilian casualties...
Humanist_Activist
Sep 2013
#120
Actually, my red line is when disingenuous chumps use emotional blackmail to advance their agenda
Alamuti Lotus
Sep 2013
#125
You just repeated the RW lines I heard in real time against Clinton
senseandsensibility
Sep 2013
#128
So what makes that different than the innocent bystanders who are now dead in Syria?
CakeGrrl
Sep 2013
#136
How many people are you willing to kill to prove that killing people is wrong?
alphafemale
Sep 2013
#138
Where is yours? The real one, not the one that seems like an easy "we can do it"
TheKentuckian
Sep 2013
#141
How 'bout if a country invaded Iraq on the pretext of WMD, and knowingly lied about it?
grahamhgreen
Sep 2013
#142
PS - this is similar to "don't let the smoking gun be a mushroom cloud" argument.
grahamhgreen
Sep 2013
#143
The idiotic responses to this OP aside, thinking about where the red line is is a Good Thing
Posteritatis
Sep 2013
#147