Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malthaussen

(18,072 posts)
7. When I say Mr Ellsberg violated no trust of position...
Wed Aug 21, 2013, 03:36 PM
Aug 2013

... I mean that very specifically. Mr Ellsberg was not acting in any official capacity, or using information to which he had access as a result of a position then held. It's a nice point: he knew about the PP because of work he did previous to release, and he had an "in" at the RAND corporation (which, while not a public agency, was under contract to the government at the time. Still is, I think). As a comparison, if PFC Manning had waited until separation from military service to expose what he knew, I would not have a problem. Of course, arguably without such access he would have had nothing to expose.

As for the conditions of PFC Manning's pre-trial incarceration, I addressed that in a reply infra: I agree that it may be persuasively argued that his sentence be commuted to DD and time served. Lord knows, those conditions should serve adequately pour encourager les autres. I'm not completely satisfied on this point atm, but in any event 3-5 should include some portion of time served.

-- Mal

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why I think Bradley Manni...»Reply #7