For helping people register to vote? nope (Reply #36)

In the discussion thread: How can ANY Democrat defend the detention of Greenwald's partner? [View all]

Response to Ken Burch (Reply #29)

Tue Aug 20, 2013, 09:34 PM

uponit7771 (50,010 posts)

36. For helping people register to vote? nope

You do understand where you question is going right?

tia

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

135 replies	Author	Time	Post
How can ANY Democrat defend the detention of Greenwald's partner? [View all]	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	OP
Good Question - Have Wondered The Same	cantbeserious	Aug 2013	#1
Democrats and Progressives are not the same thing necessarily	LearningCurve	Aug 2013	#2
True that.	HooptieWagon	Aug 2013	#6
Well said! n/t	RKP5637	Aug 2013	#28
Who exactly is willing to pay ordinary Democrats	creeksneakers2	Aug 2013	#75
Yes, the conservative Democrats were adamant supporters of slavery at one time,	Zorra	Aug 2013	#17
"Democrats". Not Democrats. n/t	backscatter712	Aug 2013	#3
What you said. nt	silvershadow	Aug 2013	#95
It's been kind of quiet on this board about Defending Miranda....	KoKo	Aug 2013	#4
Indeed, additional insight from Barry Eisler.	proverbialwisdom	Aug 2013	#86
How true the last line from your exerpt....	Little Star	Aug 2013	#125
Gonna Be A Quiet Thread... But We Are Here... With YOU... And David... And Glenn...	WillyT	Aug 2013	#5
....and all the others who have been shut up, shut down, Willy	grasswire	Aug 2013	#8
I Hear Ya... But As The Oldest, With Three Younger Sisters...	WillyT	Aug 2013	#11
love that as a quote..."doing the right thing	Swagman	Aug 2013	#72
Apparently pretty easily.	NuclearDem	Aug 2013	#7
I'm not defending it nor do I care	ChangeUp106	Aug 2013	#9
Sucks to see daily abuses of "those people" (edited to match edited)	Cerridwen	Aug 2013	#10
We did	burnodo	Aug 2013	#13
Perhaps you have ADHD?	WinkyDink	Aug 2013	#43
''Just make this NSA story STOP PLEASE!''	DeSwiss	Aug 2013	#101
When you help people who are breaking the law please expect to become a suspect and then	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#12
who broke a law?	burnodo	Aug 2013	#14
The person who admitted to hiring onto a company for the sole purpose of stealing from it and the	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#15
Was Snowden in London the other day?	burnodo	Aug 2013	#16
Nope, just the people aiding a law breaker.... further	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#19
and "they" were terrorists?	burnodo	Aug 2013	#21
Depends on what they were trying to do with the stolen gov info or what the person who stole them	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#22
so "their" status as possible terrorists depends on what the police find?	burnodo	Aug 2013	#24
Nope, on the word "possible" alone...see, you don't screw with the gov this way and there's no ...	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#25
so they should stop you and hold you in the airport for 9 hours	burnodo	Aug 2013	#32
If I stole gov info and could be possibly helping terrorist or who the go considers enemies then not	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#33
but you could be a possible terrorist	burnodo	Aug 2013	#39
Yes, steal gov info give to AQ and help them attack the US to bring down and admin	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#45
"bring down and(sic) admin"	burnodo	Aug 2013	#48
Legitimate link and quote to US citizens being "spied" on!? Videoing a person walking into a store	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#53
It's going to be pretty hard to believe that the NSA	R. Daneel Olivaw	Aug 2013	#74
You know perfectly well that Greenwald and Miranda aren't giving info to Al Qaida.	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#61
lol....had me, GG is an asshole...I've seen him proffer a position and if challenged even a little b	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#63
It doesn't matter what Greenwald is like as a person.	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#65
They probably are on a terrorist list	creeksneakers2	Aug 2013	#73
If Miranda was illegally carrying classified information, why wasn't he arrested?	burnodo	Aug 2013	#81
Because he just received data from Laura Poitras perhaps?	VanillaRhapsody	Aug 2013	#89
That wasn't what I was talking about	burnodo	Aug 2013	#90
because they found what they were looking for perhaps...	VanillaRhapsody	Aug 2013	#92
The information is encrypted	creeksneakers2	Aug 2013	#94
his other partner is an award-winning fillmmaker	noiretextatique	Aug 2013	#133
and who admitted to hiring onto a company for the sole purpose of stealing from it??	burnodo	Aug 2013	#20
Link inside	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#23
now you have heard of that, the link is provided to you below	Whisp	Aug 2013	#26
Well, good for him!	burnodo	Aug 2013	#30
lol! okay. Let's encourage more of that kind of theft.	Whisp	Aug 2013	#34
the Pauls	burnodo	Aug 2013	#40
no...no .. fuck the over racist bastard pauls, ....fuck em good too...	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#46
I think you might need some sleep	burnodo	Aug 2013	#49
When the Government does *wrong they should be exposed.	R. Daneel Olivaw	Aug 2013	#82
I applaud Snowden for exposing the Enemy Within and	Swagman	Aug 2013	#85
Link and quote ANY of the activities PROVEN to be illegal and I'm not talking about internal	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#35
"I'm not talking about internal audits that no one believes anyway"	burnodo	Aug 2013	#41
No, I admit I'd like the link and quote proof of law breaking I asked for	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#42
Your post showed that the audit was a joke	burnodo	Aug 2013	#51
False, and still no link and quote. My post said no one would believe them as they haven't	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#54
They haven't done ANY oversight	burnodo	Aug 2013	#84
Really?	one_voice	Aug 2013	#57
OK, but you're trying to tell me what Snowden did was a crime	burnodo	Aug 2013	#88
No, you don't get to compare...	one_voice	Aug 2013	#96
so your definition of crimes is all that matters	burnodo	Aug 2013	#97
Stop twisting shit...	one_voice	Aug 2013	#103
Stealing what?	burnodo	Aug 2013	#105
Does it matter?...	one_voice	Aug 2013	#106
Oh? What am I?	burnodo	Aug 2013	#108
AMEN!!!	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#130
yes I congratulate him as well. And I believe he has been extraordinarily brave	Swagman	Aug 2013	#80
did you break the law ?	Swagman	Aug 2013	#78
So you'd have said the Freedom Riders and those who helped them had it coming?	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#29
For helping people register to vote? nope	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#36
My point is that you cannot cite "the law" when the law is unjust.	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#38
Then you change the law from inside not break it needlessly and the argument of	uponit7771	Aug 2013	#44
I agree that people of color have it worse under our legal system...and you already knew I did.	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#59
"Needlessly?" Seems the stimulus it provides is needed.	Wilms	Aug 2013	#68
OK, but document classification is not "unjust"	Recursion	Aug 2013	#102
A suspected terrorist?	morningfog	Aug 2013	#67
So the NYT and Washington Post reporters and editors who aided and abetted	Warren Stupidity	Aug 2013	#83
so all laws should be obeyed even when those laws violate basic civil liberties??????	bowens43	Aug 2013	#126
People are calling him a mule and a trafficker. They are infantilizing him	Luminous Animal	Aug 2013	#18
If he went on a mission to transport laptops, ets for GG then he is classified as a mule.	Thinkingabout	Aug 2013	#27
Using the term "mule" in this context implies that there is no moral difference	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#69
We don't know if the information deserves to be	creeksneakers2	Aug 2013	#93
GG has been publishing information, maybe Miranda should punish GG for setting him up.	Thinkingabout	Aug 2013	#111
Mule, the device of transportation, Miranda was a mule for GG, GG did not want to transport	Thinkingabout	Aug 2013	#110
because they care more about Obama's reputation than the direction America is headed	Skittles	Aug 2013	#31
Precisely - IMHO - Dedicated Obama Supporters Are Having Difficulty Supporting A Bush Era Program	cantbeserious	Aug 2013	#47
Sadly, it seems cognitive dissonance is at play with some people here.	ohnoyoudidnt	Aug 2013	#50
they'd be reacting differently if it was a Dem other than Obama, too	Skittles	Aug 2013	#64
And the Tiger-Beat adoration	Summer Hathaway	Aug 2013	#116
More likely they are knowingly facilitating the direction America is headed. nt	NorthCarolina	Aug 2013	#52
BINGO	cherokeeprogressive	Aug 2013	#62
Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding Ding	R. Daneel Olivaw	Aug 2013	#87
This! Exactly this!	RetroLounge	Aug 2013	#107
K&R	forestpath	Aug 2013	#37
Because the term "Democrat" has been coopted	quakerboy	Aug 2013	#55
How can any sentient being defend this?	mia	Aug 2013	#56
You ARE aware that Greenwald's partner was caught with stolen classified info, right?	ConservativeDemocrat	Aug 2013	#70
So what if the information was "classified"? our national security state is so out of control	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#76
I-binned :-\| n/t	DeSwiss	Aug 2013	#99
...	RetroLounge	Aug 2013	#109
"reality-based commnunity"	Skittles	Aug 2013	#117
Huh?	Caretha	Aug 2013	#129
Here's your link	ConservativeDemocrat	Aug 2013	#135
Because they are raging hypocrites who will defend anything a govt. agency that answers to Obama	MotherPetrie	Aug 2013	#58
It's not democrat issue	liberal N proud	Aug 2013	#60
How could any Democrat put his partner	jazzimov	Aug 2013	#66
You can't put this on Greenwald.	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#79
Travelling through the UK is 'in harm's way'?	muriel_volestrangler	Aug 2013	#122
there is a struggle between those of us who believe in the liberal and democratic society and those	Douglas Carpenter	Aug 2013	#71
Thank you for stating it so well.	mia	Aug 2013	#77
hear, hear.	Little Star	Aug 2013	#127
I agree	gopiscrap	Aug 2013	#91
Oh that question's easy to answer -- they can't.	DeSwiss	Aug 2013	#98
I couldn't have said it better myself.	backscatter712	Aug 2013	#121
I don't know any Democrats who ever supported these Bush policies and I don't any	sabrina 1	Aug 2013	#100
Good point Sabrina	Caretha	Aug 2013	#131
I don't decide everything by whose side	creeksneakers2	Aug 2013	#104
My friend, these folks see the exact same world a TeaPubliKlan does	TheKentuckian	Aug 2013	#112
Over the years that I've been reading DU	Summer Hathaway	Aug 2013	#113
Thank you for your post, Summer.. a voice	Cha	Aug 2013	#115
Thank you Summer.	sheshe2	Aug 2013	#120
Opinion of a lawyer who piloted the 2000 Act through the Lords: Miranda should not have been detaine	muriel_volestrangler	Aug 2013	#124
Good heavens	frazzled	Aug 2013	#114
"libertarian melodrama" sums it up nicely.	great white snark	Aug 2013	#119
It only stopped at 9 hours because, if they'd kept the guy any longer,	Ken Burch	Aug 2013	#134
How can any American oppose it?	Little Milly	Aug 2013	#118
enjoy your probably brief stay.....	bowens43	Aug 2013	#128
Memo to self: Must join group hysteria or stay will be brief.	Little Milly	Aug 2013	#132
Because there is a group here on DU who are true Authoritarian Fascists	1awake	Aug 2013	#123

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.