Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BumRushDaShow

(128,859 posts)
59. Here is the Libertarian credos, front and center
Sat Aug 17, 2013, 09:04 AM
Aug 2013
The Virtue of Selfishness

Throughout history, man has been offered the following alternative: be “moral” through a life of sacrifice to others—or be “selfish” through a life of sacrificing others to oneself. In The Virtue of Selfishness, Ayn Rand blasts this as a false alternative, holding that a selfish, non-sacrificial way of life is both possible and necessary for man.

The Virtue of Selfishness is a collection of essays presenting Ayn Rand’s radical moral code of rational selfishness and its opposition to the prevailing morality of altruism—i.e., to the duty to sacrifice for the sake of others
.

In “The Objectivist Ethics,” Rand gives an outline of her code of rational selfishness, and of her argument establishing it as the only objective, fact-based moral code in human history. In the course of the essay, she raises and answers a fundamental and fascinating question: Why does one even need a morality?

In essays including “The Ethics of Emergencies,” “The ‘Conflicts’ of Men’s Interests,” and “Doesn’t Life Require Compromise?” she raises common ethical questions, shows how altruism has crippled people’s ability to approach them rationally, and explains how her moral code provides a solution to them. In “Man’s Rights” and “The Nature of Government” she applies her ethics to formulate the basic principles of her political philosophy, while rejecting the altruistic doctrines of “rights” to health care, employment, etc.


http://www.aynrand.org/site/PageServer?pagename=objectivism_nonfiction_the_virtue_of_selfishness


Sound familiar? The railing against "altruism" is certainly NOT "liberal" or "progressive". In fact it is the antithesis of those concepts. To even embrace being "selfish" without accepting that their brand of it DOES harm others, is what they miss.

And being "opportunistic" is certainly right up there as a prime example of this philosophy of "rational selfishness". Their argument being - "See??!1!11!! I exposed the EVIL Nazi fascist Obama!!111!!1! Now I EARNED my cookie!!!1!11! Meanwhile those who they "use" to get to their goal, are summarily discarded and ultimately "sacrificed" for the $$$. They see this as a "win-win".
Are you in favor of the NSA spying on everyone? Or are you a Ron Paul worshipper? MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #1
Do you agree w/Greenwald that defeating Democrats & helping Republicans is a good strategy? KittyWampus Aug 2013 #45
If that's what he says, then of course I don't agree. nt MannyGoldstein Aug 2013 #46
Fuck Ron Paul. I sure wish Rachel would interview Glenn Greenwald. Autumn Aug 2013 #2
!! BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #4
Well thank goodness LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #3
Sorry but your "A" + "B" does not equal "C". nt BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #5
LMAO LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #10
LMAO at your rolling on the floor BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #15
OK, Greenwald, the Pauls, and Snowden are all horrible, horrible people LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #17
Fuck Ron Paul BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #19
Oooooooooook LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #20
So how's your bubble world got you feeling? BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #22
If you think it was bad to do it historically, why do you seem to think it is OK now? LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #25
Why do leftists think that anyone is "okay" with it? BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #27
I don't understand LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #28
You ignored my solution BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #29
Obama clearly does NOT welcome discussion on this topic LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #31
You dont seem to welcome discussion of Greenwalds Libertarianism. Does that mean you did something stevenleser Aug 2013 #34
You can discuss your dislike of Greenwald as much as you like LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #36
You're inability to address my question tells me all I need to know. nt stevenleser Aug 2013 #38
So you think that the President is micro-managing? BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #35
Micro-managing? No LondonReign2 Aug 2013 #37
How many things have we started to see changed BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #39
And Bob Woodward was DNI... ljm2002 Aug 2013 #47
Mark Felt remained anonymous BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #50
exactly. That logic is silly. Warren DeMontague Aug 2013 #66
It's another questionmark in terms of Greenwald's credibility. Libertarians agenda is to hurt Obama stevenleser Aug 2013 #32
Go figure Bobbie Jo Aug 2013 #6
libertarian douchebags unite!11111! dionysus Aug 2013 #8
With their own channel, even. Bobbie Jo Aug 2013 #14
Looks like they already did. DevonRex Aug 2013 #16
Thread Winner! Cha Aug 2013 #49
So...any thoughts on what Greenwald said on the interview? David Krout Aug 2013 #7
Yeah Bobbie Jo Aug 2013 #9
Seconded: Fuck Ron Paul. n/t Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #13
OMG! *cleans computer monitor* Thanks. freshwest Aug 2013 #40
. ProSense Aug 2013 #41
Of course I listened to it BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #12
ha! I thought so too. Paul looked snoozie and uninterested... Whisp Aug 2013 #64
I suppose this makes Snowden a liar now, or something, right? n/t Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #11
He was already a liar. ucrdem Aug 2013 #26
It just makes me doubt greenwalds judgement Blue_Tires Aug 2013 #33
like you didnt doubt his judgment before the interview nt David Krout Aug 2013 #51
I don't care for this as well; it's just important that people remember the message is pure fact. n/ Fire Walk With Me Aug 2013 #62
anyone who would go on ron paul`s channel has zero creditability madrchsod Aug 2013 #18
And what's worse BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #21
Funny story: ProSense Aug 2013 #42
The Holy Trinity of Greenwald, Snowden and Assange are all Paul loving tools who geek tragedy Aug 2013 #23
Kochs, Pauls, and Greenwald ucrdem Aug 2013 #24
Interesting and good interview, hadn't seen it quinnox Aug 2013 #30
Sorry, I ain't watching those douchebags. Obama said directly that he wanted Congress to REVOKE freshwest Aug 2013 #43
OMG I finally figured out what "GAS" was BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #44
Best to learn it in a sanitarium like this, more hygienic, ya know. freshwest Aug 2013 #48
Amazing hypocrisy and hyperbole on the part of interviewer and interviewee. MADem Aug 2013 #52
Here is the Libertarian credos, front and center BumRushDaShow Aug 2013 #59
It's terribly perverse, isn't it? And not terribly subtle, either! nt MADem Aug 2013 #60
How can a Democratic president be okay with the NSA spying? darkangel218 Aug 2013 #53
Um, the NSA's job is to spy. geek tragedy Aug 2013 #54
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Aug 2013 #55
There is no evidence of such a program aside from Internet hyperbole. nt geek tragedy Aug 2013 #57
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Aug 2013 #58
Is the NSA vacuuming up my personal information and scrutinizing it? geek tragedy Aug 2013 #61
This message was self-deleted by its author darkangel218 Aug 2013 #63
Refresh my memory please. darkangel218 Aug 2013 #56
Two Pees in a Pod. n/t Whisp Aug 2013 #65
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ron Paul Channel's very f...»Reply #59