Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Hightower: The Trans-Pacific Partnership is not about free trade. It's a corporate coup d'etat [View all]LongTomH
(8,636 posts)76. You need to read Hightower's closing paragraphs:
There is also a broad, well-organized, knowledgeable, and politically experienced coalition of grassroots groups already at work to prevent this perversion of America's fundamental governing principles. Still, many pundits will tell us that it's impossible to stop them, because the public can't understand these complex deals.
Baloney. First, this one is not at all complex; it's a plain old power grab by the world's moneyed elites, and people today have no interest in giving more money and power to the world's 1-percenters. Second, populist forces now opposing TPP have won many of these brawls in the past, including:
Stopping Clinton's demand for fast track authority in 1998.
Sidetracking the Multilateral Agreement on Investment in 1998.
Derailing an expansion of the World Trade Organization in 1999 and again in 2010.
Defeating the Free Trade Area of the Americas (a 14-nation expansion of NAFTA) in 1999.
Halting such multi-nation trade deals as AFTA (Andean countries) and NAFTA-style deals with APEC (an earlier attempt at the TPP with 18 Pacific Rim Countries), SACU (Southern Africa), Malaysia, and Thailand.
Sidetracking the Multilateral Agreement on Investment in 1998.
Derailing an expansion of the World Trade Organization in 1999 and again in 2010.
Defeating the Free Trade Area of the Americas (a 14-nation expansion of NAFTA) in 1999.
Halting such multi-nation trade deals as AFTA (Andean countries) and NAFTA-style deals with APEC (an earlier attempt at the TPP with 18 Pacific Rim Countries), SACU (Southern Africa), Malaysia, and Thailand.
My message: We can do this. We The People can protect our democratic rights from this latest threat of corporate usurpation. The only way the Powers That Be can win is to keep the public in the dark about what TPP is. So now is the time for Lowdowners to sound the alarm, spread the news about the Trans-Pacific Partnership (start by sharing this article with your social networks!), and shine the light of day on their power play before it gets to Congress.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
99 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hightower: The Trans-Pacific Partnership is not about free trade. It's a corporate coup d'etat [View all]
cali
Aug 2013
OP
The Dems get elected the same way the Repugs do, with loads of cash from corporations.
Dustlawyer
Aug 2013
#12
I concur; the corporate-military have taken control, the will of the people no longer matters,. .
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#22
It's so frustrating b/c you cannot even get most of the members of DU to understand and
Dustlawyer
Aug 2013
#67
Yes there are way too many folks around who are mindless defenders on party lines,. sad.
Civilization2
Aug 2013
#74
Democrats vs. Republicans is a distraction. This is a corporate thing. Both parties
rhett o rick
Aug 2013
#43
The Dem party moved so far right that it's what republican was and both are corporate tools.
L0oniX
Aug 2013
#41
Just say "No" to Hillary Clinton in 2016. We cannot let her be our candidate.
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#81
While Spot-On, the mods will likely lock it because it is from Op-Ed News.
NorthCarolina
Aug 2013
#45
66 recs, and how large was the clique that decided the post was "off topic"?
JDPriestly
Aug 2013
#83
HONEST, SERIOUS QUESTION -- What are the President's stated motives for advancing the TPP?
Nuclear Unicorn
Aug 2013
#5
I believe he wants higher labor and environmental standards. If they are in the agreement,
pampango
Aug 2013
#85
All right, I'll concede that "Liberal" is probably an inaccurate term after I worked all night...
Volaris
Aug 2013
#39
I guess, but then they prove just how well the Corporate propoganda masters have done their work...
Volaris
Aug 2013
#60
Without TPA, this will indeed die. The House does not trust Obama and will deny him TPA.
pampango
Aug 2013
#98
Enacting this against the will of the American people amounts to an act of treason.
Enthusiast
Aug 2013
#24
Just tell them TPP will increase their taxes and make more government regulations.
AdHocSolver
Aug 2013
#93
US government making deals with corporations is never good for the little people.
L0oniX
Aug 2013
#44
It's weird how nobody ever defends this. I don't think it's very popular. nt
limpyhobbler
Aug 2013
#54
I would say a corporate coup d'etat is an accurate description of what TPP and other
liberal_at_heart
Aug 2013
#97