Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

BrentWil

(2,384 posts)
Wed Feb 22, 2012, 10:07 PM Feb 2012

GOP Debate: Ahmadinejad=no power,Supreme Leader=power.Why the FUCK doesn't someone call them on it? [View all]

Newt called Ahmadinejad a dictator. Both Rick and Mitt agreed. Why the FUCK want anyone say, "Gentlemen, you mentioned Ahmadinejad as a dictator. The Iranian constitution and, from all appearances, the Iranian state grants most power to the Supreme Leader and unelected bodies of clergy. What power do you think Ahmadinejad has in the country of Iran?"


I am not anti-war. What I am is anti-idoits deciding. These guys are talking about the possibility of launching a war that could have very wide consequences for the US, the Middle East, and the World. With that, they don't seem to understand some fucking basic facts about how the country runs. Jesus Christ, it is embarrassing. Hell, Ahmadinejad got slapped by the head of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard about a year ago and went hiding and basically refused to come out. That doesn't sound like someone that is making important decisions for the country of Iran.

War doesn't piss me off. The talk of war without some basic understanding of what the fuck you are talking about does.

Done with my rant.

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»GOP Debate: Ahmadinejad=n...