Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Terminally ill “Simpsons” co-creator to leave entire fortune to charity [View all]DearHeart
(692 posts)15. So HORRIBLE that he is terminal! What an amazing & generous man! nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
108 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations

Terminally ill “Simpsons” co-creator to leave entire fortune to charity [View all]
octoberlib
Jul 2013
OP
he understands that money only matters if its used and using it for good makes him
roguevalley
Jul 2013
#37
Problem is, what we call "cancer" is actually hundreds of different diseases.
nomorenomore08
Jul 2013
#51
he's not giving away his entire fortune. he's setting up a rockefeller-affiliated foundation.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#19
NO. A foundation needs only give away 5% of its total assets every year. Meanwhile, it can
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#31
he is setting up foundations that do good work. True, there will be trustees, but so what?
KittyWampus
Jul 2013
#40
no, *your* post is sickening, & the continued fraud upon the general public by big capital is
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#41
The entire set of assumptions underlying your post are so counter-factual that it's not worth
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#50
If that was his motivation, why not just give it to his friends and skip the 5%?
joeglow3
Jul 2013
#66
which is why he didn't just 'give it to his friends'. avoiding taxes while retaining indirect
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#84
has to give 5%/year of the assets. but can also make 5% or more off the assets.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#100
he doesn't get to personally keep the money in any case, since he's dying. but foundations
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#102
that doesn't speak to the issue of retention of the principal. i said nothing about salaries for
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#104
1. the grammar is just an aside. 2. you weren't talking to 'someone else'. 3. 'tax evasion'
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#107
I who never agree with Kitty most certainly do, your post is disgusting and
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#61
Why is his post disgusting? The only ever time I contacted a charity for help...for my dog,
Safetykitten
Jul 2013
#71
i call foundations a fraud on the public, and every one of these PR releases about rich people
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#78
Really? That seems so weird to me. I would have thought after one's death they no longer
cui bono
Jul 2013
#95
Part of the reason he set up a foundation was so that the foundation could be 'heir' to those
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#105
Well in my case, I asked for help. I have never asked for help in anything ever from charity...
Safetykitten
Jul 2013
#43
They have a mobile free vet clinic in Los Angeles but the emphasis is on rescue
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#63
"The Simpsons" has been on the air since 1989. "Drew Carey" didn't premiere till '95.
nomorenomore08
Jul 2013
#52
Foundation capital is directed at particular charities that big capital uses to direct social
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#42
you don't think you can critique my post without putting your posting right on this site in
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#86
They rescue dogs to become assitant animals to Veterans and those with hearing
Bluenorthwest
Jul 2013
#64
So, because they did not give money to random person who sent them a letter they aren't charitable?
joeglow3
Jul 2013
#67
I know...it makes me sad when someone does good, but just not in the way other people would do it...
renate
Jul 2013
#53
Of course they do. If you don't believe in animal domestication, it makes sense
duffyduff
Jul 2013
#90