Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
so will the worshippers still be worshipping when the feds break down their doors at midnight? nt msongs Jul 2013 #1
Maybe their worship makes them immune cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #4
You will know them by their worship sign posted on the door. "No Ram-Me Likey!" Safetykitten Jul 2013 #5
If they can't break the passwords what good is the NSA? cthulu2016 Jul 2013 #2
Since many folks use the same password across systems (when they can) The Straight Story Jul 2013 #6
Anyone stupid enough to use the same password for two different purposes deserves to be hacked. FarCenter Jul 2013 #10
What kind of elitist crap is this? People who don't use unique passwords are Ed Suspicious Jul 2013 #12
Maybe people will read a strong statement and learn - better some are outraged than poor practices FarCenter Jul 2013 #15
Why are you talking like that's easy? caseymoz Jul 2013 #46
Security also requires buy in and engagement Paulie Jul 2013 #48
you mean like older folks who maybe aren't really good at using computers or have memory liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #14
Anyone who talks like this deserves it, actually. JackRiddler Jul 2013 #18
No, FarCenter, they do not. Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #26
Even if you have many unique passwords, only one or two is really needed Bradical79 Jul 2013 #45
No intelligence agency is nearly as omniscient as people seem to think they are. Posteritatis Jul 2013 #21
Uh, I wouldn't bank on that Aerows Jul 2013 #36
yep ConcernedCanuk Jul 2013 #52
There's nothing serious about that computing power alongside modern encryption. Posteritatis Jul 2013 #65
Both ends still need a key, JoeyT Jul 2013 #70
Funny rejoinder, but this is truly scary. It's all super secret. chimpymustgo Jul 2013 #68
Perhaps the warrants ( if there are actual warrants) dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #71
Nothing to see here. If you are not doing anything wrong, what's the problem. Besides 'our people' Purveyor Jul 2013 #3
Even Bush did not got this far. avaistheone1 Jul 2013 #7
"The sky is falling!" whatchamacallit Jul 2013 #8
........ ohheckyeah Jul 2013 #9
I have more security on my world of warcraft account than I have at any of my banking institutions, Ed Suspicious Jul 2013 #11
Let's see: 20 passwords * 200,000,000 people * changed every 30 days dickthegrouch Jul 2013 #13
Changed every thirty days? Fumesucker Jul 2013 #17
Yeah...LOL. bvar22 Jul 2013 #69
Is it fascism yet? GiaGiovanni Jul 2013 #16
Nope. Obamcism. bigwillq Jul 2013 #19
they can demand all they want but those companies have lawyers who know arely staircase Jul 2013 #20
Last I read warrants were coming 200 sheets/roll for two-ply, 48 rolls in the Family size. n/t jtuck004 Jul 2013 #25
well, maybe but apparantly that hasn't happened according to the OP nt arely staircase Jul 2013 #28
Given that the court that issues them is secret, and the entity they are served on is bound by that jtuck004 Jul 2013 #29
Warrants? - who needs warrants! ConcernedCanuk Jul 2013 #53
Yeah. About that... Pholus Jul 2013 #34
Yeah, just ask that guy from Qwest. Fuddnik Jul 2013 #44
Article doesn't really give a Date or that this is a New Sweeping Request, though. KoKo Jul 2013 #22
Some passwords/combinations used: kentauros Jul 2013 #23
+1. nt bemildred Jul 2013 #66
This is beyond infuriating if true. Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #24
I know right! Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #37
Yep ... a recipe for tyranny at that point. Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #38
Well it is meta data zeemike Jul 2013 #41
That was my thought. Jackpine Radical Jul 2013 #42
This is an interesting and fascinating artcile, well worth reading beyond the headline. arcane1 Jul 2013 #27
Why do you hate Obama? Iggo Jul 2013 #30
I don't trust CNET, as no major outlet has reported this Federosky Jul 2013 #31
If I were not to trust CNET, it would be because of a poor reputation. tuvor Jul 2013 #39
The author Declan McCullagh doesn't have a good reputation struggle4progress Jul 2013 #56
Thank you. n/t tuvor Jul 2013 #57
Can you elaborate? nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #58
He has a history of making stuff up. In mid-June, he misrepresented remarks of Congressman Nadler: struggle4progress Jul 2013 #60
Anything else? Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #61
He says he created the "Al Gore invented the internet" quote struggle4progress Jul 2013 #62
I know. nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #63
But isn't collection involving just METADATA??? Pholus Jul 2013 #32
All I can say is wow. With that they could lure whistle blowers to remote sites and kidnap them. pam4water Jul 2013 #33
It's the obstructionist congress zipplewrath Jul 2013 #35
Good for the firms that push back. geek tragedy Jul 2013 #40
Any real online company doesn't store passwords MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #43
More ginned up outrage. randome Jul 2013 #47
Perhaps you missed other parts in the article: The Straight Story Jul 2013 #50
Who in their right mind would say that abuse never occurs? randome Jul 2013 #67
I'm tired of this shit. I'm going to Ilsa Jul 2013 #49
Oh but wait~! U.S. Postal Service Logging All Mail for Law Enforcement Purveyor Jul 2013 #51
I remember that post. I have doubts about Ilsa Jul 2013 #54
Declan McCullagh? The libertarian liar? Really? struggle4progress Jul 2013 #55
It would be nice to know who sent the request. Incitatus Jul 2013 #59
Well the state of Oregon just made it illegal for businesses (OR universities)... cascadiance Jul 2013 #64
"If it's true that Al Gore created the Internet, then I created the 'Al Gore created the Internet' DevonRex Jul 2013 #72
The author is a global warming denier, libertarian economist, Carnegie Melon grad. DevonRex Jul 2013 #73
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Feds tell Web firms to tu...»Reply #10