Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: More incredible things Juror B37 said on CNN!! [View all]Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)56. First, the phone company guy made the point many times that phone call times are rounded UP
to the next minute. So, there could be your 40 seconds of screaming.
Yes? No? Or am I not understanding your point?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
63 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Well, she was following the Defense attorney's orders not to use her common sense.
Liberal_Stalwart71
Jul 2013
#1
It sounds like she probably read that on a website and wasn't paying attention in court
Quixote1818
Jul 2013
#2
Yes, she IS wrong. But she used "that fact" to render a witness testimony as unreliable
Duer 157099
Jul 2013
#15
I heard what she said. I don't know if she plotted this timeline herself or if it was presented.
dkf
Jul 2013
#32
She said on Piers Morgan her phone had her cut off at 7:16 and they reported he died at 7:17.
dkf
Jul 2013
#41
First, the phone company guy made the point many times that phone call times are rounded UP
Duer 157099
Jul 2013
#56
I don't know what her argument for not considering her own stated "fact" that
truedelphi
Jul 2013
#38
If you back up the screams though, and all that she said happened, when does confrontation begin?
dkf
Jul 2013
#27
I cannot see whatever Ignore posted. If anyone else knows, still curious -- thx. [n/t]
stranger81
Jul 2013
#14
yeah, that's a very weird thing, that the prosecution didn't do their own timeline.
HiPointDem
Jul 2013
#43
Very very suspicious. That is NOT juror without preconceived notions of the case.
johnnyrocket
Jul 2013
#22
Maybe so but I sure as hell wouldn't run onto national TV a couple days later
Duer 157099
Jul 2013
#36
She was very confused about fitting Stand Your Ground law with Manslaughter law.
JDPriestly
Jul 2013
#50
So, in spite of all the media speculation that the prosecution put on a bad case,
stopbush
Jul 2013
#37
There's an old saying that applies to juries in the South - "They sure can pick em".
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2013
#42
I agree. She had her mind made up the moment she stepped in the courtroom.
Hong Kong Cavalier
Jul 2013
#58
This woman is a complete moron. I wonder why they didn't just declare a mistrial.
Initech
Jul 2013
#62