General Discussion

Liberal_Stalwart71

(20,450 posts)

1. Well, she was following the Defense attorney's orders not to use her common sense.

Reply to Duer 157099 (Original post)

Mon Jul 15, 2013, 11:52 PM

Jul 2013

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

63 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

More incredible things Juror B37 said on CNN!! [View all] Duer 157099 Jul 2013 OP

Well, she was following the Defense attorney's orders not to use her common sense. Liberal_Stalwart71 Jul 2013 #1

LOL so she follows THAT instruction?? Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #4

Doesn't sound like she has any common sense. stranger81 Jul 2013 #6

Common sense is for the elite, citified arugula eaters alcibiades_mystery Jul 2013 #12

It sounds like she probably read that on a website and wasn't paying attention in court Quixote1818 Jul 2013 #2

If that was the timing of the phone calls, why doesn't that make sense? dkf Jul 2013 #3

Completely self contradictory Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #7

I didn't follow the minute by minute... dkf Jul 2013 #23

It's not the timing of the phone calls. madaboutharry Jul 2013 #13

Yes, she IS wrong. But she used "that fact" to render a witness testimony as unreliable Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #15

There is contradictory evidence tht the jury must weigh: truedelphi Jul 2013 #19

Were those scenarios presented to the jury and by whom? dkf Jul 2013 #24

Down in reply/post number 25, there is the truedelphi Jul 2013 #31

I heard what she said. I don't know if she plotted this timeline herself or if it was presented. dkf Jul 2013 #32

The phone record logs were presented as evidence Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #33

The screams went on for 40+ seconds, so you need to subtract that out. dkf Jul 2013 #34

My understanding of what phone calls she was talking about Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #35

She said on Piers Morgan her phone had her cut off at 7:16 and they reported he died at 7:17. dkf Jul 2013 #41

A minute of screaming is a long time Politicalboi Jul 2013 #51

Hold on, are you saying you think this juror thought Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #55

First, the phone company guy made the point many times that phone call times are rounded UP Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #56

I don't know what her argument for not considering her own stated "fact" that truedelphi Jul 2013 #38

there was no such instruction in the jury instructions TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #46

You are right and thank you for the clarification. truedelphi Jul 2013 #49

She wasn't the foreman n/t Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #57

Because that is not the timing of the phone calls Quixote1818 Jul 2013 #20

If you back up the screams though, and all that she said happened, when does confrontation begin? dkf Jul 2013 #27

Tell me the precise time of the 911 scream call Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #60

Everyone noticed that the Prosecution did not develop a narrative of the case DURHAM D Jul 2013 #5

Speaking of leader, do we know who the forewoman was yet? stranger81 Jul 2013 #8

I think she said it wasn't her. NaturalHigh Jul 2013 #10

I cannot see whatever Ignore posted. If anyone else knows, still curious -- thx. [n/t] stranger81 Jul 2013 #14

Seems to defeat the purpose. n/t TroglodyteScholar Jul 2013 #21

I have been wondering that myself. DURHAM D Jul 2013 #17

That's what I was speculating. stranger81 Jul 2013 #26

.. Cha Jul 2013 #39

And the police testifying for the Defense? VanillaRhapsody Jul 2013 #29

yeah, that's a very weird thing, that the prosecution didn't do their own timeline. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #43

they did TorchTheWitch Jul 2013 #47

must have missed it then. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #48

There was never any doubt... NaturalHigh Jul 2013 #9

I disagree naaman fletcher Jul 2013 #63

Trayvon was a boy of color. johnnyrocket Jul 2013 #11

Several times in the interview madaboutharry Jul 2013 #16

Oh no! sounds like Cha Jul 2013 #40

sounds like she knows him personally. HiPointDem Jul 2013 #44

Are you sure? Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #59

She was doing exactly what the defense wanted, I expect RedCappedBandit Jul 2013 #18

Very very suspicious. That is NOT juror without preconceived notions of the case. johnnyrocket Jul 2013 #22

Here is what the Domestic Goddess herself, Roseanne, tweeted about the jury truedelphi Jul 2013 #30

CNN Anderson Cooper interviews Juror B-37 (Full, 36:49 minutes) below Tx4obama Jul 2013 #25

She had an entire NIGHT to ruminate on this. dkf Jul 2013 #28

Maybe so but I sure as hell wouldn't run onto national TV a couple days later Duer 157099 Jul 2013 #36

She was very confused about fitting Stand Your Ground law with Manslaughter law. JDPriestly Jul 2013 #50

I'm sleepy so I'll read your full comment tomorrow - but I wanted to say... Tx4obama Jul 2013 #52

I'd be interested in that. JDPriestly Jul 2013 #54

So, in spite of all the media speculation that the prosecution put on a bad case, stopbush Jul 2013 #37

Or bad instructions from the judge truebluegreen Jul 2013 #53

There's an old saying that applies to juries in the South - "They sure can pick em". Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #42

She was never going to vote guility BainsBane Jul 2013 #45

I agree. She had her mind made up the moment she stepped in the courtroom. Hong Kong Cavalier Jul 2013 #58

+1 Blue_Tires Jul 2013 #61

This woman is a complete moron. I wonder why they didn't just declare a mistrial. Initech Jul 2013 #62