Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
49. But Rex, remember when America used to be wrong about everything when Bush was
Thu Jul 4, 2013, 06:22 PM
Jul 2013

President? What happened, did we end all those nasty Bush policies?

But Catherina, America is never wrong about anything! Rex Jul 2013 #1
Lol. Nothing like smearing egg all over your face and pretendnig it's not egg Catherina Jul 2013 #5
Do you think this is why he was denied airspace? Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #51
But Rex, remember when America used to be wrong about everything when Bush was sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #49
bookmarking. I am silvershadow Jul 2013 #2
bookmark this too. There was no inspection. His refusal to budge on that is why he had to sit 13 hrs Catherina Jul 2013 #10
That may well be, but doesn't distract me at all from the fact that we apparently had a hand in it silvershadow Jul 2013 #13
Absolutely! Catherina Jul 2013 #20
I appreciate your attempts to keep us informed. truedelphi Jul 2013 #68
'I am not some sort of delinquent, whereby you can take control of the plane.' Octafish Jul 2013 #36
How did Austria verify passports without knowing how many people were on the plane? -- n/t mazzarro Jul 2013 #61
I hope the Spanish ambassador got the bum's rush mitchtv Jul 2013 #83
So am I! nt Mojorabbit Jul 2013 #54
gee. I'm shocked. cali Jul 2013 #3
Hi Cali! Catherina Jul 2013 #11
I'm gonna post this here: Hissyspit Jul 2013 #60
Oops! malaise Jul 2013 #4
So according to this article the call to Austria came after the jet had already landed. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #6
and " referred to a diplomatic note requesting Snowden's extradition." Catherina Jul 2013 #12
Thanks for posting /nt think Jul 2013 #7
Ineffectual comes to mind. GeorgeGist Jul 2013 #8
...another Prosense thread? Earth_First Jul 2013 #14
funny..nt xiamiam Jul 2013 #16
No, ProSense Jul 2013 #19
Is that a link I see? East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #23
It changes colors after you click on it. jazzimov Jul 2013 #44
Care to name something I've pulled out of my ass? East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #46
East Coast Pirate, Jr.? jberryhill Jul 2013 #59
Hey, if you can pretend to be a lawyer, I can pretend to be a pirate. East Coast Pirate Jul 2013 #63
Lol jberryhill Jul 2013 #81
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #89
This message was self-deleted by its author Puglover Jul 2013 #94
Yeah. Another rerun. nt Pholus Jul 2013 #103
Duzy!!!!!!!!!!!!! dixiegrrrrl Jul 2013 #41
It would have violated International Laws, Treaties, Immunities etc IF they had tried to get him sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #53
When did the Brits threaten to invade the Ecuadoran embassy? nt okaawhatever Jul 2013 #64
August 16, 2012 was when Forbes reported it Fumesucker Jul 2013 #82
Britain "rules the waves" or "waives the rules?" Eleanors38 Jul 2013 #101
After Julian Assange went there. Fortunately there were smarter people around who prevented that sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #84
I remember it, as do so many others, of course. It made them look like assholes. Judi Lynn Jul 2013 #85
Seems odd that Morales would have used his own jet. sibelian Jul 2013 #98
Thanks for the repost, Catherina. sibelian Jul 2013 #9
billions upon billions spent in spying and surveillance and their most wanted man makes them look xiamiam Jul 2013 #15
That struck me, to! Couldn't ascertain who got on a plane? Jesus. Eleanors38 Jul 2013 #102
knr Douglas Carpenter Jul 2013 #17
no. no, i've been assured this was the sponataneous decision of some EU agency.. frylock Jul 2013 #18
EU Agency in this case means American Embassy based in the EU I guess.... nt silvershadow Jul 2013 #21
According to a RW Austrian paper Recursion Jul 2013 #22
Any quotes from govt officials? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #28
That's my point. This is run by a RW Catholic daily and nowhere else Recursion Jul 2013 #69
The only reason to disregard it is if that paper has something to gain from falsification... sibelian Jul 2013 #100
Thank You For Sharing cantbeserious Jul 2013 #24
You're gonna need a better source or an additional source Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #25
I think what you are smelling comes from your many posts on the Morales issue... PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #29
See the article I posted at the link? Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #33
And you made your OP after the French Foreign Minister had already made the PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #35
And yet the French still say their airspace was never denied. Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #37
No, they don't. Again, the French Foreign minister apologized.. PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #39
It's like watching Lamb Chop & Friends singing The Song That Doesn't End. idwiyo Jul 2013 #48
It's the leading newspaper in Austria. Judi Lynn Jul 2013 #32
Not a US corporate source. I'm just looking for additional sources and quotes from govt officials Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #34
What you are attacked for is quoting anonymous sources you seem to agree with PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #38
Philippe Lalliot, spokesman for the French foreign ministry, Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #40
Actually, no that's not what he said... PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #42
Timing WovenGems Jul 2013 #96
Exactly. n/t PoliticAverse Jul 2013 #97
Oh ya. Don't want to jump to conclusions. Hissyspit Jul 2013 #65
Actually many sources reported French denial Cali_Democrat Jul 2013 #66
It's a RW paper owned by the Catholic church (nt) Recursion Jul 2013 #79
Bullshit here, bullshit there. Democracyinkind Jul 2013 #52
This message was self-deleted by its author Recursion Jul 2013 #55
This message was self-deleted by its author Democracyinkind Jul 2013 #56
If you are watching the Corporate media, you won't see it there. sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #86
Yes, just like certain images of "flight paths" we could discuss. nt Pholus Jul 2013 #104
no surprise Chaco Dundee Jul 2013 #26
Yes. There's no mystery as to who ordered this. n/t DirkGently Jul 2013 #27
Good catch, again, Catherina. Thank you for this. n/t Judi Lynn Jul 2013 #30
Now there's an ambassador who deserves to be recalled magellan Jul 2013 #31
He didn't do this on his own. Even if he could have, or did, what explains the other countries? n/t Catherina Jul 2013 #43
I don't believe he did it on his own magellan Jul 2013 #47
Exactly! What a mess n/t Catherina Jul 2013 #50
Don't these types of communiques JimDandy Jul 2013 #70
I would imagine so. State oversees our diplomats. magellan Jul 2013 #71
Indeed. Perhaps a fall on his sword JimDandy Jul 2013 #73
Tragically, I don't think they give a damn anymore magellan Jul 2013 #74
Ummmm the ambassador was told to make that phone call Marrah_G Jul 2013 #92
I acknowledge that below. n/t magellan Jul 2013 #110
Boom goes the dynamite... truebluegreen Jul 2013 #45
Thank you for posting, Catherina...indeed. +1 eom Purveyor Jul 2013 #57
One wonders why we aren't hearing a blow by blow in the American press. dkf Jul 2013 #58
This message was self-deleted by its author Catherina Jul 2013 #62
So the world's worst rouge demands everyone else follow laws..... DeSwiss Jul 2013 #67
We knew this would be the case MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #72
I was surprised that US State Department didn't come right out and Explain This KoKo Jul 2013 #75
This is printed in a RW Catholic-church-owned daily and nobody else is running with it Recursion Jul 2013 #78
That explains it, they have no credibility flamingdem Jul 2013 #87
I have already posted confirmation independent of Die Presse that a call took place. Democracyinkind Jul 2013 #88
Well, isn't that special?! nt City Lights Jul 2013 #76
I thought it was all grandstanding Savannahmann Jul 2013 #77
What I wouldn't give for a little idea.... sgtbenobo Jul 2013 #80
Kicked and Recommended! Enthusiast Jul 2013 #90
I guess the NSA got their lines crossed! WinkyDink Jul 2013 #91
Thanks for the thread! byeya Jul 2013 #93
It still doesn't explain two things davidpdx Jul 2013 #95
From the CIA probably or could have been the State Department. Cleita Jul 2013 #99
Did his name HAVE to be "Echo"? Spitfire of ATJ Jul 2013 #105
Yes, I see the hand of Divine Providence in this carolinayellowdog Jul 2013 #107
If there were any doubt caseymoz Jul 2013 #106
Former chief of Austrian security agency Polli claims: it was the Russians temmer Jul 2013 #108
Thanks Catherina LiberalLovinLug Jul 2013 #109
This is getting to be such a disaster Doctor_J Jul 2013 #111
K & R !!! WillyT Jul 2013 #112
K&R. (nt) Kurovski Jul 2013 #113
Hey DU, we did good! A few discreet tweets here and there & RT_Spanish has picked this up Catherina Jul 2013 #114
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»It was the US AMBASSADOR ...»Reply #49